• @taiyang
    link
    533 months ago

    I loved this guy since the juxtaposition photos between him and the child labor folks. I wonder if Harris campaign is getting to make decisions because this whole situation blindsided DNC officials/strategists who have historically made stupid calls. They haven’t had 4 years to overthink a campaign.

    As cynical as I am, I think laughing Harris just felt a good feeling about smiling Walz that she just didn’t get from Shapiro, and no strategist hack was able to convince them otherwise.

    • @GaMEChld
      link
      263 months ago

      DNC sucks at strategy. I think making quick decisive moves, especially with the public’s diminished attention span is proving very effective. Campaigns should probably focus on being like 3 months before the elections in this era.

      • @Scallionsandeggs
        link
        25
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Should Harris win (and especially if she wins big), I could see it changing the nature of campaigning here. Three months goes against all the conventional wisdom.

        The media won’t be happy about it, but it’s past time we bring the press back to public service and away from profiteering anyway.

      • @SeriousMite
        link
        73 months ago

        I think conventional wisdom on political strategy is long overdue for an update.

    • @fluxion
      link
      English
      153 months ago

      I suppose this is a good time for me to send that nice donation I’ve been putting off and hope it helps to let the DNC see what happens when they don’t disenfranchise progressives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 months ago

      Harris’s primary campaign seemed to be defined by Harris herself taking progressive-ish positions and then later walking them back after someone in her orbit convinced her she had to be more status quo. Maybe that campaign flaming out has taught her to stop listening to those people.

    • qevlarr
      link
      73 months ago

      New York Times called it a “vibes pick”. Sounds about right

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        A campaign stands or falls based on vibes.

        Don’t get me wrong. This guy seems like a solid choice based on his record, too, but you really can’t overstate how important vibes are.

        • qevlarr
          link
          13 months ago

          Absolutely, I’m in favor, don’t get me wrong