• @Rapidcreek
      link
      -93 months ago

      I would think she knows him a lot better than a guy on Lemmy, Agreed?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        They didn’t say they knew him better than Pelosi. Merely that Pelosi is a beacon of honesty.

        Isn’t she the most successful investor of all time, like more successful that people who do it for a career.

        • @Rapidcreek
          link
          -33 months ago

          You have a problem with Pelosi? The man has helped a lot of com0anies in the silicone valley. I find it amazing that you have a problem with the most successful speaker…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            I do have a problem with Pelosi and her insider trading, yes. I think we should hold our representatives to a higher standard, even if they’re on our side.

            • @Rapidcreek
              link
              -33 months ago

              Her husband makes millions by investing venture capital. She really doesn’t need Insider trading. But, spread the nonsense, I really don’t care.

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                English
                13 months ago

                You realize that his win/loss record is better than Buffet’s right? He only makes millions because of the hit tips and insider trading coming from her role in congress.

                • @Rapidcreek
                  link
                  03 months ago

                  Hell you say. The first trillion dollar business.will emerge from silicon Valley within the next few years. There are a lot of people there that take higher risk to get higher reward than Buffet.

                  • FuglyDuck
                    link
                    English
                    13 months ago

                    That’s not what I said.

                    I said that his win/loss ratio was higher. Given the nature of the investments pelosi makes, you’d expect there to be one moonshot that pays for all the other losing investments and maybe a few more that were weakly profitable.

                    His win/loss ratio outperforms Buffet, which suggests he has inside information that’s better than Buffets. (Or did you think buffet was some kind of genius? Neither are. They just have better information than the average investor.)