• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      725 months ago

      Kids make maps. Stuff in the maps is sold for Roblox bucks. Roblox bucks cost money to buy. The kid who makes the map gets the Roblox bucks, and can sell them. The problem is you only get 30% back when you sell a Roblox buck.

      So kids spend time making big maps and servers, buying ads, getting shoutouts on YouTube/whatever, and Roblox takes a 70% cut from all of it

        • The Quuuuuill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          745 months ago

          Its exploiting child labor and the impulsive brain chemistry of adolescence.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -265 months ago

            Fair enough, but couldn’t the same be said about YouTube? They also take the biggest cut of the ad money for creators.

            • The Quuuuuill
              link
              fedilink
              English
              605 months ago

              Yes. Using kids to drive engagement on YouTube is exploitative. Parents who do that are exploiting their children

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  Why did anyone read my comment as an excuse? I was pointing two fingers instead of one on Roblox.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    155 months ago

                    Probably the “but”. I agree that both are exploitive and they should all be called out on it.

            • The Quuuuuill
              link
              fedilink
              English
              385 months ago

              What would you call it when a child does work that you profit from?

            • @TrickDacy
              link
              English
              75 months ago

              Doesn’t matter what you call it. It’s profitable and you know that’s what’s meant.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              Is labor. There is a whole market of Roblox related things, there are job sites, freelance sites that employ kids to work on design/programming/marketing of these game modes. To pay them the game currency that maybe later can be traded for real money.

              Is not just kids tinkering with the game.

        • @mashbooq
          link
          English
          18
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          A normal business, yes. Normal businesses are highly and cruelly exploitative, which is why we decided 80 years ago (in the US) that children, at the very least, should be protected from them.

      • Reddit is better.
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -725 months ago

        I said explain. It’s this old school thing we used to do where we JUST TELL A PERSON SOMETHING

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          365 months ago

          I get what you are saying, and actually agree with out. But you don’t have to be an asshole about it. No one has the obligation to attend your tantrums.

          Children make games on Roblox (real games, the thing people do working in the industry), Roblox makes money off those games and pays close to nothing to the children. Therefore, exploits children.

        • @blackbelt352
          link
          English
          305 months ago

          The video is an explanation, none of us want to regurgitate multiple 30-45 minute videos that already explain exactly what your asking.

        • @mke
          link
          English
          19
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Sometimes, there are already resources explaining more clearly and thoroughly than we could. And although I’m unsure if this case qualifies, there are definitely topics that can’t be reduced to a few sentences. Thus, a reputable link is often worth more to both sides: it saves the explainer time and effort while informing the target far better.

          If you don’t want to engage with the content, I believe there are better ways to go about it than being rude to people who were likely trying to help.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          English
          55 months ago

          Obvious bad faith argument

        • Badabinski
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          This comment is such a beautifully concise argument for the existence of block buttons. Toodles~

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          No we didn’t. Telling people something was invented in 2016 by russian bots in Kamchatka on Twitter.

          Watch the video or feed it into ChatGPT for a summary or Google a pre-existing summary.

    • @eskimofry
      link
      English
      165 months ago

      You must not be just a troll… but a mountain troll