It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Absolutely the correct stance, nothing dirty about it. At this point, for better and for worse, the Internet is a basic necessity. Imagine having your water turned off because you threw water balloons at your neighbour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      453 months ago

      Not water baloons, but some companies will cut off your water if you’re sharing it with a neighbor. (especially if that neighbor had their water cut off for not paying a bill)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        783 months ago

        Which is absolutely ridiculous since you are paying for the water that you are sharing.

        • the post of tom joad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          30
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I know you know this but it bears saying explicitly: it’s because pretty much all laws are out there to enforce property first. Humanity is secondary. We all know implicitly that it’s not illegal to share your water because it’s unethical. It is illegal because making it illegal protects the water company’s profits, humanity be damned.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            133 months ago

            We all know implicitly that it’s not illegal to share your water because it’s unethical. It is illegal because making it illegal protects the water company’s profits, humanity be damned.

            it’s perfectly ethical, unless i’m stealing the water, they’re using the same water i’m using and that means i’m paying for it. It’s literally not a problem.

            It might cut flat charges but, get fucked.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              173 months ago

              I think you misinterpreted, because you two are saying the same thing. It is ethical to share. Therefore, it has not been made illegal for being unethical (because it is ethical), it has been made illegal to protect profits.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            43 months ago

            For sure. Even when it isn’t a law the same outcome happens when corporations get the police to enforce their policies.

          • @Lost_My_Mind
            link
            English
            33 months ago

            How though? If you’re using extra water to share with your neighbor, and YOU still pay your water bill, they still get extra money for extra usage, right? It just comes from your wallet rather than your neighbors.

            • the post of tom joad
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Because your sharing your water with them disincentivizes their paying their bill.

              Extrapolating on this, if you could legally share your water with the neighborhood couldn’t an enterprising person with a zeriscaped yard sell their water to a thirsty lawned neighbor? That’s money the water company considers theirs

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        253 months ago

        Garbage collection services dislike when people throw their garbage in neighbor’s cans even when the neighbor is paying for the larger can (e.g. the disposal volume being used). This has led to some garbage distribution piracy alongside recycling collection crews.

        In case you wanted some cyberpunk dystopia in your cyberpunk dystopia.

          • Jessica
            link
            fedilink
            English
            153 months ago

            Neon lights and vaporwave when you open the lid. It’s the bees knees.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            53 months ago

            Two ways.

            The outer layer is the ad-hoc (often underground or criminal) system that serves to rectify a problem caused by the unjust rules of the legitimate system, in this case, refuse pirates who match overflow to underused capacity.

            The inner layer comes from service to the community becoming punk when the mainstream becomes destructive. When recycling bandits start redistributing garbage they go from being commensal with their neighborhood (causing some noise pollution and some additional mess) to mutualist (providing a service to the neighborhood they scavenge).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              I appreciate the explanation, but I don’t think I follow what that has to do with cyberpunk.

              Wikipedia describes cyberpunk as “futuristic technological and scientific achievements, such as artificial intelligence and cyberware, juxtaposed with societal collapse, dystopia or decay”.

              I understand the relation to dystopia, and even your comparison to the punk movement, but I don’t get the cyberpunk comparison, lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          Wow, that’s really odd. My garbage company doesn’t care what I do with my or anyone else’s can. I can even set mine on my side of the street, and as soon as it empties, refill it and move it across the street (there’s like a 15 min gap between them), and they literally don’t care. I also overfill it fairly often, and again, they don’t care. As long as the truck can pick it up and dump it, they’re happy.

    • @psycho_driver
      link
      English
      363 months ago

      Or Nestle asked your water utility to disconnect your service because you’re drinking free water instead of purchasing theirs. Not a direct correlation but closer.

        • @ripcord
          link
          English
          53 months ago

          I mean, municipal water most places isn’t free, but for drinking water it’s effectively free.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            I’ve had those things before. But there is maintenance and power to factor in; so not entirely free.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              Power yea maintenance not really been running the same pump for my house for almost 2 decades now

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            I was just being sarcastic. I am WELL aware that wells exist. Also my city water isn’t really all that expensive. Certainly much cheaper than buying bottled water on the daily.

    • @Modern_medicine_isnt
      link
      English
      153 months ago

      I was thinking, imagine the media companies demand the power company turn off your power because you downloaded a pirated movie. Or gas stations stop selling gas to you because you speed.

    • @Lost_My_Mind
      link
      English
      73 months ago

      Imagine having your water turned off because you threw water balloons at your neighbour.

      gasp!

      I do that ALL THE TIME!!!