F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

For those not fluent in Republican crazy-speak, Kelly’s meltdown was triggered by Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris the night before, barely one hour after Trump all but face-planted on the debate stage. Kelly was especially triggered by Swift highlighting her appreciation for vice presidential nominee Tim Walz’s support of LGBTQ+ rights.

Other right-wing commentators, like Ben Shapiro, took another approach: making fun of Swifties. “Note: if you vote for a particular candidate because your favorite singer is doing so, please don’t vote. You are too stupid to vote,” wrote Shapiro on X. Meanwhile, Elon Musk, the richest man on the planet, threatened to impregnate her.

  • kamenLady.
    link
    2993 months ago

    “F you, Taylor Swift!” shouted Megyn Kelly, “and f all of the people who want to see these children have body parts chopped off.”

    Weird

    • @DrCake
      link
      1483 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
        link
        873 months ago

        And the reason more than one woman has needed a hysterectomy after being denied a medically necessary abortion.

            • @Passerby6497
              link
              English
              53 months ago

              Yeah they traditionally just get the truthiness level by looking it up in their gut. standing up and pulling it out of their butt

                • @Fedizen
                  link
                  23 months ago

                  he’s just saying the quiet part out loud (your gut includes your colon)

      • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
        link
        English
        163 months ago

        In the U.S. it’s not necessarily a christian thing. But the ven diagram of people who circumcise their children in the U.S. and chrstians is very close to a circle.

        • @Boddhisatva
          link
          243 months ago

          But the ven diagram of people who circumcise their children in the U.S. and chrstians is very close to a circle.

          Sorry, but that’s not even close. Male circumcision is very commonly practiced among the Jewish and Islamic faiths as well as American Christians, who I guess just can’t resist a fad.

          According to current estimations, approximately 30% of all males across the world— representing a total of approximately 670 million men — are circumcised. Of this number, about 68% are of Islamic faith, less than 1% of Jewish faith, and 13% are non-Muslim, non-Jewish Americans.

          • @angrystego
            link
            113 months ago

            You’re giving the world numbers. Olgratin was talking about the US. I don’t know the US numbers but they could very well be quite different.

          • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
            link
            English
            93 months ago

            Which is why I said it was very close, not “a damn near circle” like people normally say with that phrase.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -43 months ago

        God can we please leave this weird obsession with circumcision on reddit? You’re not wrong, it’s just such a weird thing to focus on all the goddamn time.

        • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
          link
          English
          93 months ago

          It’s a bodily autonomy issue that has justifiably left a lot of men feeling powerless and angry. People are gonna talk about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -53 months ago

            It’s a dick topic of extremely minimal consequence in the grand scheme that just makes spaces like this looks like a bunch of dick-obsessed weirdos complaining because their dicks are too small.

            Like I said, you’re not wrong on the topic, it’s just being so focused on the topic in the first place is fucking weird.

            • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
              link
              English
              143 months ago

              It’s a dick topic of extremely minimal consequence in the grand scheme

              I disagree. I think this country has a problem with respecting bodily autonomy, and a large part of that is men trying to legislate women’s bodies. Showing these men that they have a horse in the bodily autonomy race so to speak is a good thing. Maybe it’s only a minimal effect, but it’s a potential pathway out of harmful beliefs.

              this looks like a bunch of dick-obsessed weirdos complaining because their dicks are too small.

              it’s just being so focused on the topic in the first place is fucking weird.

              I’ve been on lemmy for about a year now. And this one off handed thread is the only place I’ve seen this topic discussed, in the entirety of this last year. I think you are vastly overstating the frequency to which this is discussed.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -33 months ago

                To the first point, I’d argue that men centering themselves in the discussion which largely centers around attempts to remove bodily autonomy from women only hurts, not helps the cause.

                To the second point, it has come up a few times, but yes, the reason I said “leave this on reddit” was preemptive, before the problem migrates here from reddit where the topic is rampant is insanely zealous most often.

                • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
                  link
                  English
                  33 months ago

                  I’d argue that men centering themselves in the discussion which largely centers around attempts to remove bodily autonomy from women only hurts, not helps the cause.

                  I think we’d have to take a poll from the general population and compare it with a poll from an anti-circumcision group and compare it to be sure.

                  Regardless, I said it was a pathway, not a guarantee.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -3
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    I think we’d have to take a poll from the general population and compare it with a poll from an anti-circumcision group and compare it to be sure.

                    My guy, please be for fucking real right now. There is a difference between an unfounded claim and an outlandish one. If I said “all of the smartest people on earth believe Poland borders Peru,” we wouldn’t need a study or poll to confirm I was full of shit, we could just reasonably deduce it. Likewise we don’t need a survey to tell us that any man who genuinely tried to bring up circumcision as tantamount in the abortion conversation would be rightly laughed out of serious consideration.

                    Again, I acknowledge you aren’t wrong and I will acknowledge both abortion and circumcision exist under the same very broad umbrella of bodily autonomy, but frankly the scale and scope of the two are so wildly and enormously different as to instantly render any attempts at comparison moot.

                    And honestly, I really think that you know this too. I truly believe that if you can divorce yourself from your personal investment in this topic, you will also see what an absurd comparison that is.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Not in the slightest. I’ll happily talk dicks with you all day; I’m extremely sexually liberal.

                But talking about dicks isn’t the same as listening to a bunch of chud weirdos whining and crying about the world’s least consequential issue that’s they’re only mad about because deep down they ignorantly think their tiny dicks would be bigger if they hadn’t had their foreskins stolen.

                Again, it’s just a weird fucking thing to focus on. Bring it up when the topic comes up, of course, but to fucking insert it in conversations as if it’s relevant, as was done in this post, will always be weird.

                But hey, if you wanna talk about dicks for fun, I’m game. Mine curves slightly to the left, how about you?

      • @Clent
        link
        363 months ago

        Hatred is stupidity. Always has been.

        • @Landless2029
          link
          183 months ago

          Hatred is also taught.

          Its sad that kids are in MAGA as well due to this.

        • @frunch
          link
          43 months ago

          This is why evil rarely succeeds in the long-term: when you have that many self-absorbed fucks attempt to work together, it rarely yields anything useful.

          • @Omgpwnies
            link
            English
            23 months ago

            yeah, but it takes a fraction of the time to destroy than to build. They don’t need long-term, they can wreak havoc in one term

            • @frunch
              link
              13 months ago

              Good point 🍻

      • @dejected_warp_core
        link
        223 months ago

        The current Republican platform is largely based on stupid easily disproven lies.

        It’s worth mentioning that this strategy is straight out of the trolling playbook. The overall idea is to get everyone to waste their time arguing nonsense, making it impossible to discuss anything of merit. While the following article applies to internet forums, it’s not hard to see how any social media, TV, or radio, can spill over into our day-to-day discourse and have the same effect: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7573649/

        In this case, the topic at hand meets multiple criteria for deliberate trolling. IMO, there’s little room for doubt that we’re being led by the nose and baited to waste valuable pre-election time:

        • Digression - Luring others into off-topic discussions by spamming, partaking in cascades or introducing tangential topics (e.g., as in [16]).
        • (Hypo)criticism - Excessive criticism of others, e.g. on their punctuation while possibly committing the same errors oneself.
        • Antipathy - Creation of a sensitive or antagonistic context through purposeful provocation, in order to manipulate others to produce emotional responses.
        • Endangering - Giving out poor advice under an innocent guise, and others are compelled to respond in order to protect others.
        • Shocking - Posting about taboos or sensitive subjects, such as religion, death or human rights.
        • Aggression - Deliberate and open aggressing of others into retaliating (e.g., by name-calling or foul language).
        • @Donjuanme
          link
          53 months ago

          I would love to see more of the Democrats platform displayed, argued, justified and rationalized, but there’s literally no reason to talk about any of that when the other side has less discussion than a headless chicken.

          I hope the right can someday see how bad they are for policy in general.

      • @micka190
        link
        93 months ago

        The litter box thing annoys me so much. Like, do you have any idea how quickly that shit would fucking go viral if it were true? Like, every damn kid would post about it online. It’s so fucking stupid!

        • Fiona
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          do you have any idea how quickly that shit would fucking go viral if it were true

          But it was true! Just not in the way that was claimed: They had these litterboxes in case they had to barricade in the classroom for extended periods of time due to a school-shooter that the police didn’t bother to stop quickly…

          So yes, it really is a fucked up story, just in a very different way from what republicans claimed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Nonense! There’s a third kind who is both stupid and evil. They may even be the majority.

    • Peetabix
      link
      English
      103 months ago

      Megyn? How is that supposed to be pronounced?

      • @TriPolarBearz
        link
        133 months ago

        Actually, this name traces all the way back to the first cavewoman gynecologist. At the time, they named themselves based on their professions. Megyn is short for “me gynecologist”.

      • Leraje
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Weirdo Republican Talking Head No. 3464592

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Remember when NBC hired Kelly in 2017, she gave Putin a platform to spread his propaganda, she got demoted, and then eventually fired for racism? Who could have guessed that she was just another maga conspiracy nut?

      • @irreticent
        link
        13 months ago

        Wow, I didn’t know Megyn Kelly was such a staunch circumcision opponent

        Mud flaps down to her knees.