• @Ibaudia
    link
    English
    62 hours ago

    Getting mad sure, but it is definitely a dumb creative decision to have characters be random races that don’t make sense in the historical context and it’s fine to criticize it. If it’s a purely fictional world with no basis in reality then no one should care.

    • androogee (they/she)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      No. Fuckin stop it. Its unbearably stupid.

      Historical fiction has existed for a long time.

      Y’all ain’t out here throwing a pouty parade when someone adds technology or magic or monsters into historical fiction.

      But black people? Existing? If that’s where you draw the line, it’s really clear why. Make all the excuses you want.

      • @Ibaudia
        link
        English
        52 hours ago

        Historical or alternate history fiction falls under pure fiction imo. That’s fine as long as it makes sense. If it’s meant to be some super grounded realistic historical slice-of-life then it would just make me think “when are they going to bring up the fact that there’s X type of person walking around here” for the whole story.

        Not exclusive to black people. If there were a story that took place in 12th century Mongolia and there was some Nordic guy walking around I would be like “huh, what’s his story” and then be confused when it was never mentioned. That’s how I feel about a lot of these creative choices.

        • androogee (they/she)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          45 minutes ago

          That’s literally just a longer way of saying that it’s okay if it’s magic but it’s not okay if it’s black people.

          & yeah, I’ll hold my breath for people getting equally upset about white people in fiction. Any day now. I’m sure.

          I can’t disapprove a hypothetical, I guess, but a hypothetical isn’t proof of anything either.