Jack Sweeney, who gained notoriety for his @ElonJet account on X and maintained many of the suspended accounts, said on Threads that the development is “reminiscent of all my accounts getting suspended on Twitter.” The shuttered accounts, which used publicly available data to show the flight paths of private jets, initially displayed a message on Monday that read, “The link you followed may be broken, or the page may have been removed.”

Meta provided no direct warning or explanation for the suspensions, according to Sweeney, who says the accounts appear “blacked out with no options to interact or receive information.” In a statement to TechCrunch, however, an unnamed Meta spokesperson said “Given the risk of physical harm to individuals, and in keeping with the independent Oversight Board’s recommendation, we’ve disabled these accounts for violating our privacy policy.”

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    3935 months ago

    The irony of Meta/Facebook - infamous for tracking people online - being upset about jet tracking.

    • @WhatAmLemmy
      link
      English
      1525 months ago

      Rules and laws are only for the peasantry. Your level of freedom is proportional to your wealth, so Meta has a whole lotta Freedom™️

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      655 months ago

      It’s not even tracking… Tracking is what the FAA does, and makes publicly available. These accounts are just publishing the already-public information.

      Fuck every one of these shitty billionaires. Fly commercial if you don’t want to be tracked publicly.

      • unalivejoy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Obviously the way around this is to make an account that responds to any message containing a plane ID, and another that retweets it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1375 months ago

      Tracking those jets isn’t the issue. It’s sharing that information publicly. Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others, and if you think they do, then you don’t understand how targeted ads work.

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        1285 months ago

        That information is already public, how do you think he gets it?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -90
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          My name, address and phone number are public too but if you were to share it on social media you’d be breaking the law.

          • TimeSquirrel
            link
            fedilink
            745 months ago

            https://flightradar24.com

            All I need is your flight number. You don’t know how any of this works, do you?

            You don’t even need the Internet, just search up ADS-B receivers on Amazon. The plane and the ATC system itself is tattling on you every second, blasting your position out over the air.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -435 months ago

                  Do you think there shouldn’t be any laws prohibiting the sharing of people’s personal information like that?

                  • Nougat
                    link
                    fedilink
                    345 months ago

                    No, I don’t think phone books should be illegal.

                  • @BassTurd
                    link
                    English
                    325 months ago

                    Not when it comes to air traffic.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    275 months ago

                    The websites track the planes not the individuals.

                    The planes might be flying empty. It has nothing to do with GDPR.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    125 months ago

                    Is that question really “in good-faith” to “that law doesn’t apply in my country”?

              • Yeather
                link
                fedilink
                English
                75 months ago

                Finnish law doesn’t apply if you aren’t in Finland.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            155 months ago

            If you put your name, address and phone number on a public forum and someone shares that do you think that’s breaking the law? Doxxing generally applies to making personal identifiable information public without that persons consent. Those celebrities are making their own data public, or rather their private jets are because they’re required to publicly broadcast their location in real time.

            If those accounts are collecting public information they’re not doing anything illegal. Otherwise we might as well call libraries illegal because they contain a registry of every book author whose book is in the library.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 months ago

            If they are public, no it is not illegal. If they are not public, but I have them because I provide a service to you, then yes it is illegal (most likely). In this case it is public information, and not even personal information. It is a plane identifier and that plane’s location. The only reason that tells you anything about it’s passenger is because said passenger is rich and entitled enough to own their own plane and use it for themself. It’s like buying the Empire State Building to live there by yourself and then complaining about someone tweeting out your address.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        775 months ago

        Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others

        Huh? How do you think ad targeting works?

        • @ReginaPhalange
          link
          English
          -105 months ago

          “Show my ad to hornly lonely 13 y/o that suffer from Tourette”
          vs
          “Here is a list of 13 y/o that suffer from Tourette”

          One of these options is less profitable for an ad network in the long run.

          • @vxx
            link
            English
            425 months ago

            Did you all forget about Cambridge Analytica?

            • @ChickenLadyLovesLife
              link
              English
              65 months ago

              It’s funny how people who get their news exclusively from their Facebook feeds have never heard of Cambridge Analytica. I can’t imagine how that could happen.

              • @vxx
                link
                English
                15 months ago

                It has been over 6 years. I guess a lot of users has been too young to care.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -27
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          An advertiser contacts Facebook and says, ‘We’d like to advertise this product to a specific group of people,’ and Facebook says, ‘Sure, hand us your money and the ad you’d like us to display,’ and then targets that ad to the desired audience. At no point does Facebook hand over user data to the advertiser.

          For example, if I want to advertise my home renovation services to all the elderly home owners in my city, then what use would it be for me if they just handed me a list of those people? None. They’re the advertising platform. It’s them who targets those ads.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            395 months ago

            Except you can add a tracking pixel to the destination website after people click through on the ad, which correlates to people’s individual profile. To say that isn’t “handing out personal information to others” is sophistry of the highest order.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -335 months ago

              They’re not handing out personal information. If you hide stuff like that in your ad links then you’re the malicious actor, not facebook.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                You may want to familiarize yourself with how their tracking pixel works. In brief, you add a line of code (provided by Facebook) to any given website and on page load that code displays a 1x1px transparent image from Facebook’s servers that allows them to establish a correlation between the loading of that website and the identity of the person logged in to Facebook on that browser. it isn’t “hiding” anything or circumventing Facebook in any way. It’s a core part of their advertising offerings. https://www.facebook.com/business/goals/retargeting

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        545 months ago

        Facebook doesn’t hand out your personal information to others, and if you think they do, then you don’t understand how targeted ads work.

        It is explicitly stated in the TOS that Meta does indeed hand out your personal information to others.

        If you think they don’t, read the TOS.

      • @Lennny
        link
        English
        18
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Meta absolutely sells your data. Check out Meta Pixel. A suite you can ad to your website to send and receive said data. Also EU fined them 1.2B for selling data of EU citizens.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        -115 months ago

        You are right the stupid peasants just too stupid to understand big brain things like privacy 🤡