• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    For its part, Boeing representatives announced they are “reviewing the report, which appears to be based on an inapt comparison of the prices paid for parts that meet aircraft and contract specifications and designs versus basic commercial items that would not be qualified or approved for use on the C-17,” the company said in a statement.

    looks dubiously at dispenser

    In what way is the right-hand soap dispenser not adequately qualified?

    EDIT: It looks like the C-17 can fly pressurized, so I don’t think that it can be undergoing pressure changes, which is the one thing that I could think of.

    • @Pyotr
      link
      English
      306 hours ago

      The COTS unit shown there is not tested and certified to the contract requirements Boeing was working to. Simple as. If the price ridiculous? Absolutely yes. But you cannot go to a home hardware store and slap one in a plane.

      • @SpaceNoodle
        link
        English
        126 hours ago

        If I can slap it in a collapsible sub, I can slap it in an airplane!

        Besides, it’s not like it’s supposed to be what’s holding the door plug on.

        • Pistcow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          247 minutes ago

          Everyone single part on a plane has to be certified and from a certified supplier that goes through a stupid process to be certified.

          • @SpaceNoodle
            link
            English
            341 minutes ago

            Well, some of it ain’t stupid.

            Imagine the shortcuts Boeing would take if they were beholden to no certifications at all.

      • @Hawke
        link
        English
        46 hours ago

        Well ya can but you’re taking some risks if you do. Your soap dispenser might not work worth a shit if you haven’t tested it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      216 hours ago

      I’m 90% sure these deals are a way to funnel money into defense contractors without having a suspicious paper trail.

      Overcharge a bit here and there, and by sheer volume you get a nice shadow budget to build and operate things that aren’t even supposed to exist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 hours ago

      The cabin is usually pressurized to the equivalent of 8000 ft asl. So the dispenser does have to deal with pressure changes. A simple vent hole aught to take care of that though.

      • @mkwt
        link
        English
        15
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Also, as the safety briefing says, “we do not anticipate a change in cabin pressure,” but if a rapid decompression should occur, there was probably some provision made so that the soap dispenser doesn’t just shatter or explode or something.