• @chemical_cutthroat
    link
    -2318 days ago

    They ran out of priceless art, I guess. Too bad, I was hoping they’d ruin something else for generations to come. Maybe next time they can knee-cap Hank Green. That’ll really show those nasty capitalists.

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      2918 days ago

      Yeah, those priceless pieces of glass in front of the art won’t be available for generations to come. Now people will have to look at the pieces of art behind those priceless pieces of glass. Those bastards!

        • JaggedRobotPubes
          link
          English
          418 days ago

          Ayyyy gimme dem tweezers and let’s make this happen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        You see your honour, he was wearning a bulletproof vest, so me shooting him totally wasn’t attempted murder, he was save all along!

        • @FooBarrington
          link
          8
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          More like “you see your honor, he was behind a 10-foot-thick wall of lead, so me shooting him totally wasn’t attempted murder, he was safe all along!”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -9
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            “The painting itself was unharmed, but the 17th-century frame sustained some damage after the soup acted as paint stripper on the delicate surface.”

            So climate activists’ official position is to target the frames of these paintings, as they see them as important enough to piss people off but not important enough to preserve?

            Time to lock originals away from the public forever.

            • @mmcintyre
              link
              418 days ago

              Way to solve one of the most pressing issues of our day. Just great work, man. The planet really isn’t that important when compared to some 17th century art. That’s where we really need to focus our preservation and conservation efforts!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                018 days ago

                That’s where we’re going to focus the problem solving, when that’s how you choose to stir shit up. We’re going to focus on preventing climate activists from destroying shit, and we’re going to talk about how to punish them.

            • @FooBarrington
              link
              1318 days ago

              Oh well, we all know that honourable judges always make morally good decisions, don’t we?

              • TheTechnician27
                link
                English
                818 days ago

                Yes exactly! The judiciary is infallible and so that’s exactly why the SCOTUS is the least fallible institution there is.