• @Zombiepirate
    link
    English
    642 months ago

    “Female” is fine to use as an adjective.

    It’s also fine to use as a noun when describing livestock, which is why it’s a red flag to describe women that way.

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What is a good word to use for people who are female of any age including young children that are not old enough to be called women in addition to women?

      ‘Women and girls’ is pretty clunky when talking about something that is gender specific, but applies to all ages.

      • Justin
        link
        fedilink
        162 months ago

        boys and men / girls and women sounds right to me

        • snooggums
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          ‘Gendered violence against teenage women and girls’ is really clunky. Especially if it needs repeating across paragraphs.

          If there isn’t something, that’s fine.

          • SavvyWolf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            152 months ago

            “Gendered violence against females” on the other hand sounds a bit too clinical though… Like you’re removing their personhood

            • snooggums
              link
              English
              52 months ago

              If ‘females’ wasn’t used by online sexists to treat women as objects would it sound that way?

              • SavvyWolf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                62 months ago

                Maybe! I don’t know if “gendered violence against men” also has the same connotations.

                Maybe this is indeed is a case of those people poisoning the term.

                • snooggums
                  link
                  English
                  32 months ago

                  “Don’t forget about gendered violence against boys!” would be a likely response to a statement about men.

                  It is absolutely a case of a term being poisoned, which does mean it needs to be treated more carefully but sucks when there isn’t an alternative.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        122 months ago

        Women is probably fine to use when the ages can be gleaned from context. You can also make the noun non gendered and use female as a adjective like “female students” or “female patients”

        • snooggums
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          I’m mainly asking when ages span from birth to old age and the goup would basically be “female persons” or “male persons” which is clunky.

          Sometimes it can be rephrased, but it often requires multiple words to mean the same thing. Plus “women of all ages” will be read as not including children.

          I’m mostly pissed that sexists ruined the only single word term we have for half of the population.

          • @HonoraryMancunian
            link
            English
            22 months ago

            Honestly I don’t think ‘women and girls’ feels clunky, but that’s just me

            • snooggums
              link
              English
              02 months ago

              It is important that when we are addressing issues of sexism, that we try to make sure that the ideas are easily understood by women, men, girls, and boys so that everyone understands how to support equality. If we only focus our effort on men and boys, without recognizing the influence also has on women and girls, then it will not be as successful. For example, the social expectations of women and girls to dress in certain ways is commonly enforced by men, women, girls, and boys even if the influence is only targeted at women and girls. Not to mention the toxic masculinity that is applied to men and boys by men, women, boys, and girls that are commonly reinforced by telling men and boys to ‘man up’ in stressful situations.

              You are right, that is smooth as butter.

      • @Klear
        link
        English
        112 months ago

        Just ask yourself if you’d use “males” in that context.

        • snooggums
          link
          English
          92 months ago

          I absolutely would use males in that context. “Toxic masculinity has a detrimental affect on males of all ages” sounds perfectly fine to me because I don’t know of a different label for the group and males doesn’t have the same dehumanizing usage as females.

          • @NiHaDuncan
            link
            22 months ago

            Male is literally the same kind of word just for the opposite sex/gender; the term specifically points out the ability to produce sperm (in many dimorphic species) for the purposes of reproducing with the opposite sex. It’s literally just saying “your distinguishing characteristic is your ability to inseminate another of your species” and is just as dehumanizing.

            The reason you would use it in that context is because it’s “[gender specific noun] of all ages.” Where if you were to say “boys of all ages” or “men of all ages” it would imply either all ages under 18 or all ages at or over 18.

            This is the same context in which you would use female as a noun, as girl/woman implies a restricted age range, just as boy/man, when you specifically don’t want one.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              02 months ago

              Doesn’t “men and boys” have exactly the same meaning though?

              I don’t feel deshumanized for being called a male.

              Disclaimer: I don’t use the noun “female” because I know some find it offensive.