• @General_Effort
    link
    English
    93 hours ago

    That’s not correct. The FT has not explained this clearly.

    If an online platform has more than 45 million monthly users (~10% of EU population) then it is classified as a Very Large Online Platform. In that case, the Commission can directly make rules for it.

    If it has fewer users, then it is still regulated by the Digital Services Act (DSA). The DSA claims jurisdiction over all platforms that have users in the EU. Among other things, they need to have a representative in the EU (IIUC). FWIW I’m pretty sure that lemmy is not compliant either.

    DSA: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2065&qid=1732567528372

    • Pennomi
      link
      English
      52 hours ago

      Lemmy also doesn’t have a single owner. It would be crazy hard to comply if each instance had to have their own representative in the EU.

      Or maybe since most Lemmy instances aren’t corporations it doesn’t matter? I bet only a lawyer could say for sure.

      • @General_Effort
        link
        English
        31 hour ago

        Instances that are established in the EU don’t need a representative. Instances outside the EU don’t really need to care. What’s the EU going to do about it? (I am not fully certain if they are in scope, unless they particularly target people in the EU.)

        I doubt the average lawyer would be able to say much. The DSA is not something 99.9% of them will ever encounter. Anyway, it does not matter if the service is run by a corporation or an individual.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 hour ago

        I’m pretty sure that lemmy is not compliant either.

        That statement proves either how little General_Effort is able to comprehend, or how bad they are at communicating. Either way, nobody should just take their word for anything.