• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4331 month ago

    He has the right to be judged by a jury of his peers, and it appears as if his peers agree with his actions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2571 month ago

      “As this man’s peers, you must be the judge of his actions.”

      “Ok”

      “Wait, not like that”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        621 month ago

        Yup. The article mentions that the prosecutors have a problem, but the U.S. people certainly don’t.

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      711 month ago

      “Friedman Agnifilo would ask potential jurors where they reside in Manhattan and where they get their news sources from to determine their political leanings,” Kerwick said.

      I mean, he is from a wealthy family, but there’s still not going to be many working class people in Manhattan.

      I think people are expecting too much from the jury.

      It’s going to be a bunch of insanely wealthy people who will 100% want to remind everyone the rich are untouchable

          • @P1k1e
            link
            961 month ago

            Dear God man, get ANY other job

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              30
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I’ve had multiple injuries at work (and a few from sports) so am unable to do my former labor-type jobs. I’m also over 65 so retraining is out of the question.

              Worked minimum wage positions most of my life so have no savings and currently live in a rooming house.

              There’s lots of us out here scraping the bottom of the barrel just to survive.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                301 month ago

                That really sucks, and I’m genuinely sorry you’ve had to deal with all that. $100K USD can be eaten up very quickly depending on your city’s cost of living though. I’d imagine someone making $100k USD in Manhattan would be barely scraping by as well

                • @kaitco
                  link
                  251 month ago

                  100K in Manhattan is nothing. My father was a principal earning $150K and still could barely get by in the city.

                  When apartments run total 40K annually, 100K is just a step above poverty wages.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  As stated in the comment you responded to I am no longer working because of injuries and age.

          • Drusas
            link
            fedilink
            451 month ago

            You have it backwards. 100k in Manhattan is not wealthy, let alone insanely wealthy. 11k is insanely impoverished, even if you live in the middle of nowhere.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I was living with about 10k CAD/y for a few years when I was single and I was mostly fine.

              Granted, this was in the 2010s. And of course I wasn’t in Manhattan, as you can guess by the currency.

              Now, I’m making about 70k CAD with a family (sole provider) and I’m just staying afloat.

            • @TheTetrapod
              link
              21 month ago

              Not if you don’t/can’t work full time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            Not in NYC, that leaves you with hundreds of dollars a month after rent if you’re lucky.

            I made 70-90k in Boston and had nothing left for savings if I dared to eat out once a week.

      • @ikidd
        link
        English
        31 month ago

        Except both sides have the same number of rejections they can apply.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      agree with

      I’d accept ‘excuse’ his actions. I’m firmly of the belief that pain caused the shooter to lose grip of the “hey don’t kill people” to where “yeah maybe just this scumbag” seemed okay. And while we wanna kill evil people, vigilante justice is less about them and more about us. And I don’t like that us that is willing to kill people outside of the Justice system we built and maintain.

      I’m okay with supporting Luigi (if it was him ;-) ) get through this break with reality that was engineered by shitbag HMOs, accepting that a person died (terrible as he was, still a person who could have been rehabilitated), accepting that it was an insanity of a kind, and getting Luigi any help he needs, medical or mental, to get back up to a productive and fulfilling life.

      As in, let’s not ruin Luigi completely, as already one fixable human is dead so lets not kill another.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        461 month ago

        And I don’t like that us that is willing to kill people outside of the Justice system we built and maintain.

        I think this is the disconnect. I don’t believe I have any (even 1/330 million) input into what the justice system is. When the Supreme Court is being openly bribed and stacked through legislative malfeasance, and as a result are taking away rights that a majority of the country supports, and yet nothing happens in response, it’s not our system. The very fact that there was a massive manhunt for this particular killer while others get ignored and he now has a federal murder charge because he was on a cell phone or planned it in another state or some bullshit is demonstration that this isn’t a system built to pursue justice equally. Neither the justice system nor the health system that provoked this reaction is based on codifying the broad cultural consent about “how things should work”.

      • sepi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Maybe he’s guilty of manslaughter in my book. Murder? I don’t see it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Manslaughter is when you didn’t mean to kill the person. You might be thinking of justifiable homicide?

          • sepi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            He didn’t mean to kill him, he just wanted to put a few rounds in the guy