I’m pretty sure it’s AI generated; which is really weird because I’m pretty sure there are plenty of 50’s era images featuring a smiling woman in the kitchen.
Yeah, I was going to say. Even without the usual tells I just could feel that it seemed AI. It’s that glossiness I think; even with a filter over top of it it looks off.
For me it’s the waist. It’s really thin, which would be ok for a 60’s illustration but the contour of her dress doesn’t match before and after the forearm.
0 reverse image search results. the fucked up shadows and broken waist/skirt are what confirm it as AI for me—not even the most lazy human artist who can render this well would draw those so poorly.
I’m pretty sure it’s AI generated; which is really weird because I’m pretty sure there are plenty of 50’s era images featuring a smiling woman in the kitchen.
Yeah, I was going to say. Even without the usual tells I just could feel that it seemed AI. It’s that glossiness I think; even with a filter over top of it it looks off.
It has plenty of the usual tells. Just look at the stovetop. Look at the casserols and details on the wall
For me it’s the waist. It’s really thin, which would be ok for a 60’s illustration but the contour of her dress doesn’t match before and after the forearm.
The shadow for the cupboard door knob above the text is a tell, as is the stove top and each knob on the range being different.
It’s 100% ai generated
Not 100%. The text is legible.
Sure, the text might be added on top by someone
Yeah, but you’d have to search for those, and who has time for that in 2024?
To be fair, making if physically cursed instead of only conceptually is an improvement.
This looks like bad human art not bad AI art, but I may be wrong
0 reverse image search results. the fucked up shadows and broken waist/skirt are what confirm it as AI for me—not even the most lazy human artist who can render this well would draw those so poorly.
And this image is just a clever rehash of those 🤷