• madthumbs
    link
    English
    132 months ago

    Kinda silly when ‘dwarf planet’ has planet still in the name.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      If you want to include all the dwarf planets then we’ve got more than 9. Pluto was only the latest object to be called a planet and reclassified. No one complains about the others.

      • @I_Has_A_Hat
        link
        12 months ago

        I really don’t get why that would be a problem. Personally, I would be delighted if we had more than 9 planets. “Oh no! We can’t have Pluto be a planet cuz then we’d have 5-10 more bodies that we’d have to call a planet too!” So what? Give me 15 planets; hell give me 50, that sounds so much cooler than reducing the number of bodies in the solar system people care about by 1.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Just because you only care about them because they’re not called planets doesn’t mean nobody else does. You are allowed to enjoy anything you want. Go learn about all the dwarf planets, asteroids, comets, and everything else!

          Planet is a useful term to describe a particular thing. We could keep adding more things to the list, but then it becomes less useful. We have multiple words for different things for a reason. A fruit isn’t a vegetable just because they both grow on plants, for example.

    • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      You’re right. We should call them planitos (or planitas if the dwarf planet is female)

    • Flying SquidOPM
      link
      22 months ago

      Even sillier to get pissed on behalf of a giant space rock that doesn’t care what you call it.