• @Deckweiss
    link
    3
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    No, because they are above the average video games market share.

    But you can’t argue that Linux gamers are a significant market share, just because the number in front of the % is the same lol.

    There are millions of video games, which all have below 1% market share. Compared to the average game, a single percent is huge.

    But there are no millions of operating systems with below 1% market share. Compared to the most popular OS, which has above 80% market share, 1 or 2 percent is insignificant.

    • @rockSlayer
      link
      015 hours ago

      Ok so if you agree that their playerbase of millions marks a successful game, then why do you consider the possibility of millions of players insignificant?

      • @Deckweiss
        link
        4
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        It’s not absolute but relative.

        Because for each individual game dev, linux gamers account for on average 2% of their sales, which is insignificant.

        Linux gamers are spread across all of the games and game devs.

        • @rockSlayer
          link
          015 hours ago

          Every person excluded from a purchase is money lost in the eyes of corporations. It’s why boycotts work when they’re properly organized. It’s why microtransactions are usually less than $5. I’ve been in corporate meetings for game companies before, I was recently illegally fired. The addition of Linux support is coming, but the big corporations need motivation to do it quickly.

          • @Deckweiss
            link
            1
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            You have to compare income from sales to development and ongoing maintenance cost of supporting a whole other platform. Not all engines can easily build for Linux. And the ones that can, are sometimes hindered by windows only libraries, which may significantly speed up development or quality of the game.

            Boycots work when the market share of boycotters is significant.

            • @rockSlayer
              link
              014 hours ago

              I am, remember? I just told you that I was (is, will continue to be) a game developer. I’ve already considered cost of development.

              • @Deckweiss
                link
                2
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                As with your arguments where you mixed relative and absolute numbers - you can not apply the learnings of one subset of game devs (yourself & the companies where you worked at) to all of them, as they operate in vastly different circumstances.

                For example, here is a different opinion from a game dev: https://x.com/bgolus/status/1080213166116597760

                • @rockSlayer
                  link
                  014 hours ago

                  I was illegally fired for organizing unions. The labor activist world is tiny. I’m able to make these statements with the confidence that I do, because I’ve talked to hundreds of people in several game companies.