• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7311 days ago

    While the company stops short of directly saying as much, it sure feels like the preposterously long ads we’re seeing here are an example of one tool in Google’s arsenal for effectively disabling YouTube playback for violators of the site’s ToS.

    I don’t get it. When my adblocker works, I don’t get to see this shit. Only if it fails I’llbe confronted with hour-long ads, so the incentive to find a better blocker is even higher?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2211 days ago

      They are trying hard to block all known adblockers. And if they ever do, this will become a serious problem.

        • @Valmond
          link
          English
          811 days ago

          So they effectively blocked the video then?

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        1711 days ago

        Arms races are rarely won by anyone.

        • @AeonFelis
          link
          English
          2211 days ago

          They are won by arms dealers.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            711 days ago

            In this case though the arms dealers make the arms for free so I’m kind of okay with it

            • @A_Random_Idiot
              link
              English
              1111 days ago

              And all of it could have been avoided if google just audited/policed the ads it served. No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform.

              But rather than spend money expanding their ad department to audit and police the adds, they are spending gobs and gobs of money trying to force people to see view virus-delivering ads, racist ads, blatant misinformation, etc.

              No one wants to be forced to spend 30 minutes watching a pragerU video on how the black man should be grateful for slavery and all the “good” its brought him

              But that seems to be the world that google wants.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                611 days ago

                Remember when Google aquired YouTube and stated they didn’t intend to change anything? Remember when the only ads were those little banners you had to close? We’ve come such a long ways from where we started and what is considered “sane” these days would have been an affront back then. Google truly did slow boil the frog.

              • @Klear
                link
                English
                311 days ago

                No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform.

                Fuck that. Ads are cancer. Willing consuming cancer is insanity.

              • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
                link
                English
                110 days ago

                If they limited the ad time in videos, ad time would be worth more.

            • @AeonFelis
              link
              English
              211 days ago

              There are arms dealers on both sides. Anti-adblockers also require development, and I doubt anyone does that for free.

        • @buddascrayon
          link
          English
          511 days ago

          This is a war that was fought by broadcast TV and the makers of videotapes, DVDs, and blu-rays. In every case the Corpos failed. So no, this arms race is and will be won by the ad blockers.