• @CharlesDarwin
      link
      English
      125 days ago

      Years ago, there was a big write-up (cannot find it any more) on the idea of Northern Liberty vs. Southern Liberty, and it was totally spot-on.

      Every American should read it because it really laid out the difference between the way cons with the Southern mindset spoke about “liberty” - in their use of this, liberty meant the right to RULE OVER OTHERS. Which is completely at odds with the normal/Northern interpretation.

      When I used to link to this article and mention it on various forums, including DP’s I’d get butthurt cons saying how unfair that characterization is/was. LOL.

      • @blazeknave
        link
        14 days ago

        Can’t find anything but a neighborhood in Philly

        • @bestagon
          link
          65 days ago

          We can’t acknowledge the whole country was racist in in the 1800s? the country kept black people as slaves. All kinds of industry in the north benefited from the materials produced by slavery even though they didn’t personally own the slaves

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            45 days ago

            Lincoln himself said if allowing slavery would preserve the union, he would do it.

      • @alekwithak
        link
        185 days ago

        How is that a spoiler? It was over 150 years ago.

        Also I’m not sure what you think people are supposed to take from that.

      • @ChonkyOwlbear
        link
        45 days ago

        The thing about the north that I’ve learned that surprised me is how many abolitionists held that belief because they didn’t want black and white people living together. They wanted an ethnostate.