I’m mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.
If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men’s butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed…
The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.
A ‘constraint’ is very loosely in set theory / math terms … basically a way of saying… these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we ‘constrain’ some of the factors.
So I am ‘constraining’ the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.
Unironically, that doesn’t involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.
EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.
How many guys does it take? Some group must have attempted this at a fur con room party or something. 2 - 4 would be too few, 5 might be where it starts to be possible but very uncomfortable. I think about the 8 - 10 person range would be the sweet spot. We need our top switch scientists researching this at once!
Gay sex is limitless compared to straight sex because they don’t stack infinitely.
Unless the gals wear strap-ons and the guys are into pegging.
You can have an infinite series of straight, stacked fuckers, you just have to constrain ‘straight’ by the condition ‘sufficiently kinky’.
OwO to the first paragraph. Can someone explain the second?
I’m mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.
If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men’s butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed…
The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.
A ‘constraint’ is very loosely in set theory / math terms … basically a way of saying… these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we ‘constrain’ some of the factors.
So I am ‘constraining’ the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.
Unironically, that doesn’t involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.
EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperiodic_tiling
Why, yes, I am both autistic and have a dirty mind, how could you tell?
I’m giving you Lemmy gold
Beans please.
We do beans around here, apparently, rofl.
i knew it, i felt it, sp3ctr4l is a reference to Spectral Theorem. Every real, symmetric matrix is diagonalizable.
I think I misunderstood the original comment. I retract my previous statement.
Picturing the resonance of the human sexipede is funny to me.
The human sexipede
I wonder what would happen if they made a loop.
Would they be stuck like that?
A risk I’m willing to take
Ah the mythical Ouroboros of Pegging.
Now this is science I can get behind! Let’s get someone behind me!
for science!
How many guys does it take? Some group must have attempted this at a fur con room party or something. 2 - 4 would be too few, 5 might be where it starts to be possible but very uncomfortable. I think about the 8 - 10 person range would be the sweet spot. We need our
topswitch scientists researching this at once!Maybe we haven’t heard of successful attempts because it’s like when ants get stuck in a loop.