• @ZILtoid1991
    link
    324 hours ago

    That’s really rude! What if I’m having sex with a trans woman? That doesn’t make her “the other guy”, not even if she penetrates me with her gigantic girl cock that dwarfs mine.

    • sp3ctr4l
      link
      fedilink
      English
      424 days ago

      Unless the gals wear strap-ons and the guys are into pegging.

      You can have an infinite series of straight, stacked fuckers, you just have to constrain ‘straight’ by the condition ‘sufficiently kinky’.

      • @daggermoon
        link
        104 days ago

        OwO to the first paragraph. Can someone explain the second?

        • sp3ctr4l
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’m mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.

          If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men’s butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed…

          The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.

          A ‘constraint’ is very loosely in set theory / math terms … basically a way of saying… these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we ‘constrain’ some of the factors.

          So I am ‘constraining’ the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.

          Unironically, that doesn’t involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.

          EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperiodic_tiling

          Why, yes, I am both autistic and have a dirty mind, how could you tell?

            • sp3ctr4l
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44 days ago

              Beans please.

              We do beans around here, apparently, rofl.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 days ago

            i knew it, i felt it, sp3ctr4l is a reference to Spectral Theorem. Every real, symmetric matrix is diagonalizable.

          • @daggermoon
            link
            23 days ago

            I think I misunderstood the original comment. I retract my previous statement.

        • @Shou
          link
          13 days ago

          The human sexipede

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        How many guys does it take? Some group must have attempted this at a fur con room party or something. 2 - 4 would be too few, 5 might be where it starts to be possible but very uncomfortable. I think about the 8 - 10 person range would be the sweet spot. We need our top switch scientists researching this at once!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 days ago

          Maybe we haven’t heard of successful attempts because it’s like when ants get stuck in a loop.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    194 days ago

    It’s 2025 and there are still way too many people who utterly refuse to understand that heterosexuality is a choice. Just kidding.

  • Lad
    link
    fedilink
    174 days ago

    I’m the guy and the other guy is the guy whose wife we are DPing

    • @TexasDrunk
      link
      254 days ago

      You keep saying that but I told you I don’t have a wife. It’s just me and you, buddy.

  • no banana
    link
    104 days ago

    Good question! I guess I’m the other guy. No way I would be the main character!