• Grimy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    Harris would have prevented Trump if she actually ran a campaign in line with her voters values.

    I choose to blame the ones that are actually in charge of the party. Blaming nameless voters is scapegoating. The party needs to change, we need to demand it instead of giving them an easy excuse.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It was literally Hitler or not Hitler. That should’ve been the only campaign they needed to run. We all saw what happened during his first term and we all knew what he was planning for his second.

      That should’ve been all the information needed and anyone who ignored that information is directly to blame for all of this.

      • Grimy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yup, and they literally still fucked it up lol

      • chaogomu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        It should have been that, but Harris was campaigning heavily to the center and the center leaning right.

        Fuck, they basically muzzled Tim Walz during the campaign. Did you notice how he was no longer allowed to call MAGA weird? I sure did.

        Then there was the fact that Harris had to run on Biden’s full platform. I know that she personally disagreed with parts, the unpopular parts. She was never really allowed to say it during the campaign.

        But really, I mostly blame that little shit Crooks, you either get it right, or you don’t do it at all. Trump used that survival to galvanize his base, and that’s what an election needs to be in this divided world. Don’t worry about the other side. We live in different realities and, they don’t often intersect. You have to focus completely on your own base as much as possible. They’re the one who will actually vote, if you can get them to care enough to do so.

        Harris didn’t do that. And that’s why she lost.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          She lost because not enough people voted for her. How people interpreted her vibe or whatever is secondary.

          • chaogomu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Not enough people voted for her, because of how people interpreted her vibe. That’s the point. You campaign to your base, or not at all.

            Never try to reach across the aisle, it doesn’t work and drives away the base.

            Look at the progressive candidates that have recently won by landslides. They campaigned to the base.

            • Optional
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              4 days ago

              You mean the mayors of solid-blue large cities?

              Yeah that was exciting but that’s not going to sell in Boise.

              • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Progressives are consistently more popular in red states than centrist Democrats. I’m living in a deep red state in a rural area and have all my life. I talk to mouth-foaming reactionaries on a regular basis. The difference in our conversations about people like Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Kamala Harris versus people like Bernie Sanders, Zohran Mamdani, and AOC is extremely stark. They never have anything good to say about the former, but always preface their disapproval of the latter with “I agree with some of the stuff they say about [insert progressive policy proposal here], but I don’t think it’s realistic / I don’t agree on their ‘woke’ stuff.”

                The centrist strategy of abandoning one’s own values to reach across the aisle to them comes across to conservatives as dishonest and shady (and they’re not wrong). They begrudgingly respect the progressive left for being uncompromising in their worldview, even if they disagree with it, and once you have someone’s respect they are more likely to meaningfully engage with your arguments. That’s how you change minds, and I’ve watched it happen on multiple occasions.

          • WoodScientist
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            “She lost because she lost.” Why do you think this is helpful in any way?

    • TrickDacy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not scapegoating to state the simple fact that when people make a choice, they are responsible for it. Like the millions who voted for Trump, Stein, or stayed the fuck home. You can blame shitty campaigns too but I’m sick and tired of hearing how the voters are fucking blameless. Fuck that. Trump wouldn’t have ever even been on the ballot if our populace wasn’t dumber than a fucking brick. I am going to blame these dipshits and evil fucks for their actions and I absolutely should blame them.

      • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s not scapegoating to state the simple fact that when people make a choice, they are responsible for it.

        Like letting off your war criminals and putting them on pedestals? Seems like an snowball effect to allow your presidents to do anything they please?

        Seems like you’re more responsible than you think for the state of things.

        Try to make your presidents liable for their actions next time so you don’t have to whine about it on the internet when you don’t get your way?

        We’re sick and tired of it too.

        • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sorry your are tired of It. Your help would be most appreciated. As the saying goes, lead, follow, or get out of the way.

          • Postimo@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s not whataboutism to detail the list of failures from democrats that built the current situation we are in. They are weak party that offers little and provides less, and they fail to win much of anything because of it.

            • TrickDacy
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              It is always whataboutism to try to shift the conversation to something you think you can argue for more easily.

              • Postimo@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Definitionally, talking about two causally linked things is not whataboutism. You could argue it’s shifting blame, and I would still disagree, but at least it would be coherent.

                • TrickDacy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Oh well, since I have something to prove to you and the thread doesn’t speak for itself I will now spend 30 minutes arguing with you about it. Oh wait it’s not 2019 anymore.

                  • Postimo@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    It is a bit academic at this point. I just hoped that liberals contend with the reality that you have to align with your voters, rather than always trying to set blame on the millions that stay politically disaffected.

        • TrickDacy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You are clueless. And you literally commented about 20 times after this so far. Latest of which is you lying your ass off and pretending Harris would be doing basically the same shit as trump with ice. Laughably false. Go away.

      • Soupbreaker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I feel like people blaming Harris, and those blaming the voters are talking past each other, and it isn’t at all productive. Just like China and the USA can both be bad, it isn’t an either/or situation.

        I understand the frustration from both sides, and I’m also angry at all the dipshits who advocated for non-voting or voting third party in the face of obvious fascism, but I’m sick of seeing this same damn slap fight in every post. We should be focusing on the future, not bickering about the past. If we’re going to build a coalition to defeat fascism—which is desperately needed—we can’t spend our energy relitigating electoral failures, and castigating the disaffected.

        Yes, Harris was a flawed candidate, running a misguided campaign. Yes, the people who didn’t vote for her are responsible for our current situation. We have to move on to what we’re going to do now.

        • TrickDacy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yep which is why we need to stop hearing about Harris.

          • Soupbreaker
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I agree, and my comment probably ought to have been directed at OP. I just see you around a lot, and while I obviously empathize with your frustration, I think this line of argument is counterproductive.

            • TrickDacy
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I mean it probably is, and I probably could at least approach it more like you if I’m going to engage.

    • TheFonz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The flame of democracy requires vigilance. Based on comments like yours I know democracy was a doomed failed experiment. We really deserve what’s coming to us

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      it was rigged against her, the voter machines have been found to have been manipulated through starlink, plus many red states stopped counting the moment they were in the lead. the DNC wernt willing to fight fraud at all, it makes them spinelesa nd complicit.

    • unfreeradical@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Your attitude is exactly the one that has brought us to the rise of Mein Orangutan, of demanding no more than whatever seems slightly more favorable than the worst case possible.

      Advancing conditions for the base of the population would depend on much more than simply voting in national elections for the Democratic Party. In fact, it requires looking beyond the two-party machine, by organizing local campaigns, worker unions, and direct action.

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, let’s blame lack of advertisement. World would be so much better if everyone advertised better.

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      4 days ago

      if she actually ran a campaign in line with her voters values.

      Yes. She was impure. Therefore we had to cast her out.

      • Grimy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        I won’t pat someone on the back who willingly covered themselves in filth and drove everyone away.

        How hard is it to just tell Israel to fuck off. They couldn’t even pretend for a few months. Not to mention everything else (billionaires, healthcare, etc). Their whole campaign was basically a shrug with a trite “well what else are you going to do, we are all you have suckers”.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sorry they didn’t tune the entirety of their election platform to your personal view of the world.

          Anyway, you got what you wanted, why are you still bitching over a year later?

          • Grimy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I wanted anyone but Trump, that’s why I still voted for Harris. I didn’t get what I wanted because supporting genocide and the 1% was more important to her and her party then what I wanted.

            It’s also telling the language you use. Being against genocide is just a personal view that can be ignored? I guess with you being pro-Israel, the entire election was a win-win situation for you.

            • Optional
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              4 days ago

              Sure comrade, I’m all for genocide. Your dumbass mod is spot on.

              FFS.

              • Grimy
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                You are the one rabidly defending a few who pushed it knowing it was deeply unpopular, even while knowing Trump was to be the consequence.

                They fucked you too you know, they fucked all of us for a foreign genocidal state. Although I’m not sure if it’s all that foreign to you.

                • Optional
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I’m rabidly defending the unconscionably simple point that the country of the United States would be in a 1000% better position if the fuckwit MAGAts and the holier-than-thou left could have shut their whine holes for six weeks and made the ultimate sacrifice to vote for Harris.

                  You “claim” you did, yet here you are continuing to shit on her campaign a year later for what can only be described as rabidly pro-trump reasons. You stand against “they” who “never condemned but actively encouraged” genocide (a provenly blatant lie) so much so that you lent all your public effort to the candidate guaranteed to pour huge amounts of gasoline on the fire.

                  Congratulations, your genocide is worse now than ever before and the end that is in sight - is the end of Gaza. Well done, you and the Wankshevics of Local 419 have done The Cause proud by narrowly focusing on the wrong thing so intently. So much so that you’re still out here now barking about it. Brilliant.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is some serious fuck the /s commentary. Anyone who can see the sarcasm dripping from this comment needs to do some serious self reflection.

      • WoodScientist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Eh, you’re obviously not capable of nuance. Just do yourself a favor and tell yourself Kamala lost due to racism or sexism. That way at least you won’t hurt your head thinking too hard.

        • Jack@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I mean, he is honest…

          He posted with a Bible, so that is rule 1 completed.

          He doesn’t make idols, he is one and is made in the image of god, so good enough. (Rule 2)

          I don’t think he can remember the name of the lord so that is rule 3.

          Rule 4 is every day for him I think.

          Rule 5: how better to honor a POS father than being a bigger POS?

          Rule 6: He hasn’t killed anybody. (Personally)

          Rule 7 is a tough one

          Rule 8: Technically he is not stealing. If you make the rules you can just say you didn’t break them.

          Rule 9: The white house is fairly sparse on neighbors so I will give this one a pass.

          Rule 10: This is also a tough one, but I will go with that his brain is so mushy at that point that it is impossible for him to covet something.

          /s of course for whoever needs it.