• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Hooray, a Persian Gulf country sentenced someone to a punishment other than death for a harmless crime!

    • @Buffalox
      link
      English
      34
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I thought 74 Lashes were clearly lethal?

      AFAIK there is nothing humane about such a sentence, on the contrary, it can mean slow and painful death.

      I just tried to find this out, in most muslim countries, the too many lashes are spread out over several times, to avoid death. A limit is for example 50 lashes per time in Saudi Arabia.

        • @Buffalox
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Absolutely, although I don’t think barbarians were quite that bad.

          • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
            link
            English
            81 year ago

            Wasn’t barbarian just Roman slang for non Romans?

            • @Buffalox
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              Yes, but more specifically the non romans from the north.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              I think Barbarian comes from much later when the Barbary Pirates were kidnapping people and razing villages and towns to the ground and forcing people into slavery. I think “Goths” and “Vandals” would be more appropriate, but I could be wildly mistaken

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Obligatory I don’t agree with the mess going on in Iran.

        With that out of the way, there’s a decent amount of restrictions on the lashing process to make the sentence painful but not lethal or permanently disabling. Lashing someone with all your strength and ripping the flesh off their back pre-Civil War America style isn’t a thing., because ripping the flesh off people’s backs tends to kill them.