• @Buffalox
    link
    English
    34
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I thought 74 Lashes were clearly lethal?

    AFAIK there is nothing humane about such a sentence, on the contrary, it can mean slow and painful death.

    I just tried to find this out, in most muslim countries, the too many lashes are spread out over several times, to avoid death. A limit is for example 50 lashes per time in Saudi Arabia.

      • @Buffalox
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Absolutely, although I don’t think barbarians were quite that bad.

        • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          Wasn’t barbarian just Roman slang for non Romans?

          • @Buffalox
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            Yes, but more specifically the non romans from the north.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I think Barbarian comes from much later when the Barbary Pirates were kidnapping people and razing villages and towns to the ground and forcing people into slavery. I think “Goths” and “Vandals” would be more appropriate, but I could be wildly mistaken

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Obligatory I don’t agree with the mess going on in Iran.

      With that out of the way, there’s a decent amount of restrictions on the lashing process to make the sentence painful but not lethal or permanently disabling. Lashing someone with all your strength and ripping the flesh off their back pre-Civil War America style isn’t a thing., because ripping the flesh off people’s backs tends to kill them.