• @MrJameGumbOP
    link
    311 year ago

    you guys build your wood houses

    What do you normally build houses with?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      511 year ago

      Here in Europe, we use mostly cinder blocks or bricks. I guess wood is more common in Northern Europe and Switzerland

      • @proudblond
        link
        421 year ago

        In California we use wood because it flexes during earthquakes. There may be damage during a big one but at least the house is less likely to collapse on you.

        • @MrsDoyle
          link
          241 year ago

          In earthquakes in NZ the wooden houses flex for sure. What kills you is the brick chimney falling through the roof.

          • @jcit878
            link
            51 year ago

            isnt brick an excellent insulator?

                • @RubberElectrons
                  link
                  31 year ago

                  Pretty neat, I’ve never seen masonry like this before.

                  I’ll point out that the webbing is likely strong, but considering the lack of ductility, this seems likely to fail during an earthquake. What’re these called, I’d like to look into them more.

              • @jcit878
                link
                21 year ago

                i was so sure it was, i looked it up after seeing your comment and… you are right. even double brick which ive always been told was great, apparently isnt all that good. TIL

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          In Europe we use reinforced concrete for the same purpose. Don’t know if it works but it’s the way it’s done.

        • @lunarul
          link
          -91 year ago

          And also because there’s no snow or serious rain. Took me years to get used to the flimsy houses here, they wouldn’t last a year back in my country.

          • @SuperIce
            link
            English
            161 year ago

            I don’t know about that. I’ve lived in a typical “flimsy” American wooden house in an area that had a lot of crazy weather with extreme winds and even a couple of tropical storms. That house had absolutely no issue with those. These houses are a lot stronger than they look. They flex but don’t break.

            • Captain Aggravated
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              My house is 80 years old, I’ve personally seen 3 feet of snow on its roof, it weathered hurricane Fran with no damage, hurricane Matthew caused a leak around the chimney that stained my living room ceiling a little.

              I’m ready to take anything this area is willing to throw at me except tornadoes. A direct strike by tornado will pull it down.

          • @Stoney_Logica1
            link
            14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I live in the Pacific Northwest where it rains quite a bit. Wood houses are fine in the rain as long as the moisture barrier and roof have been installed correctly.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 year ago

            Canada also builds houses out of wood. There’s pretty serious snow here and the houses work great.

            I also live in one of the the windiest cities in Canada . The asphalt shingles have blown off houses frequently, but the houses themselves are solid.

            • @lunarul
              link
              -3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m pretty sure those wooden houses in Canada are built differently from wooden houses in California. The ones I’ve seen are thin wooden struts covered with some drywall.

              Edit: and just saying “flimsy” by comparison to the usual reinforced concrete structures back home. I now own a home in California and it’s definitely solid.

              • @schmidtster
                link
                71 year ago

                So funnily enough, 2x4 exterior walls meet code for 3 stories, but where I am, it doesn’t meet the insulation requirements of minimum r-20, so it’s normally built with 2x6.

            • @lunarul
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I know it is possible to build solid houses out of wood. The ones I’m talking about would 100% not withstand blizzards or tornadoes.

              Like most in my native country, I grew up in a building made entirely of solid reinforced concrete slabs, including most interior walls. I could not hear my upstairs or downstairs neighbors and when I saw people punching holes in the walls in American movies I thought it’s just an exaggeration, not something that can actually happen. Wooden houses were culturally associated with poor rural people who couldn’t afford living in a nice solid apartment. That culture persists today, and even in isolated villages new homes are built with concrete structures and brick walls.

              When I bought a piece of land and was looking at options for new houses, I found a company making very solid wooden homes (still a lot more solid than the average Bay Area home) for reasonable prices and both my and my wife’s families were outraged at the idea of building a house out of wood.

              Just some random background to why I’d use the word “flimsy” for wooden struts sandwiched between drywall sheets.

      • Dandroid
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        If we did that in the US west coast, they would crack and fall apart from tectonic plate shift. You need to build things to be flexible for earthquakes and general shift.

        • @I_Fart_Glitter
          link
          111 year ago

          I live in a 100 year old farm house in California and every spring and fall we have to move the strike plate (thing the door latch nubbin goes into) on the front door up or down about 3/4 inch due to seasonal house shifting. The door stops closing and we know it’s spring time!

          • @schmidtster
            link
            101 year ago

            The structure would still be damaged, although it may be “standing”.

            It doesn’t work, it’s been tested plenty by people far smarter than either of us.

          • Dandroid
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            It would stick crack and crumble around the steel. It wouldn’t work here, which is why it against building codes here.

        • qyron
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          That’s a really poor argument to pass down to people.

          Solutions exist to make buildings earthquake resilient and the USA created a good part of it.

          Vibration dampeners, structure stress relievers, special mortars and concretes, specific structural geometry, etc.

          There is no reason why the US should keep its attachment to wood construction. Tornado alley would vastly improve if house were to shift from match sticks and hope to brick and mortar with reinforced concrete foundations.

          • Dandroid
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Tornado alley is a completely different part of the US than the West Coast, which is specifically what I was talking about. It’s like 2000 miles away. Tornado alley doesn’t have earthquakes, so this discussion doesn’t even apply to that. Bust now that were talking about it, in tornado alley, houses at least do have a brick exterior around the wood.

            • qyron
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I picked Tornado Alley because it’s low hanging fruit; I’ll get to that again.

              USA has a fixation for wood construction, completely unreasonable and unjustifiable. There are several countries and regions in the world with sysmic activity that do not opt to build in wood.

              Japan sits atop a zone of tectonic plate subduction. Hearthquakes are not unknown to them and they build with modern materials. Tokyo, with its extreme population density, is built to withstand earthquakes and hurricanes. Are the USA dumber than Japan?

              Regarding Hurricane Alley, wrapping a woodframe with brick doesn’t make the structure sturdier, just makes it heavier and more prone to break under stress, as the brick work won’t have structural role.

              A properly built modern brick or block structure has a super structure reinforced with rebar and concrete, which then receives the brick/block work to finish the building, with some walls being part of the superstructure of the building. This forms a monolithic construction that tends to be very stuborn and stays in place unless something blows it to pieces. Older buildings used other techniques, usually tied to the brickwork itself to create load bearing structures.

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        That’s because Europe has had many more centuries worth of deforestation. The greatest resource the Americas had to offer to Europe was essentially unlimited lumber.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And we wasted a lot of our forests on superfluous things like war ships - see the Castillan plateau which is now a dry and barren land.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Once you’ve destroyed an ecosystem, it takes a lot of effort to bring back. Often you can’t just expect to plant the same type of trees as before and expect it to take.

              There are ways to introduce things gradually, but it’s not an on/off switch.

              • @DarthBueller
                link
                21 year ago

                Plus there are entire keystone species of trees that blights drove to actual or morphological extinction. I don’t know about European species, but the mountains of appalachia used to be covered in massive American Chestnut trees that were so big around at the trunk they were on par with west coast species. After the blight, you can still find groves of chestnut trees, but its like they’re a different species - they live 7-9 years and die basically around the time they first mast. They never live long enough to really leave the sapling phase.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In Florida houses are also built from cinder blocks because wood is too weak against hurricanes.

        Edit: interiors can be built from wood, but all exterior walls are made with cinder blocks.

        • @schmidtster
          link
          101 year ago

          Exteriors are wood too, hurricane straps. Basically metal connectors connect everything from ground across the roof to the ground again.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            What part of Florida? I know there’s different wind speed ratings depending on how far north you’re building. In South Florida I only ever saw cinder block or full concrete exteriors.

            • @schmidtster
              link
              21 year ago

              It should be compliant everywhere, maybe a particular municipality has specific restrictions though.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Same in the Caribbean. Houses and buildings made of concrete to survive hurricanes. Windows may blow out but the walls stay firm.

        • @NewNewAccount
          link
          91 year ago

          Interesting. Here in California, building brick structures is prohibited because of the risk during earthquakes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I’m actually living in California now. Very different structures to the buildings. Houses are much smaller overall too. But the landscape is so much nicer to look at and explore. I never realized how boring and flat Florida was until I left.

      • @MrJameGumbOP
        link
        41 year ago

        We have plenty of brick houses here too, but they all are still built around wooden frames for the most part

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Wood is becoming popular for new constructions in France too.

        With the new regulations you need to limit the amount of CO2 emitted for building and maintaining the house.

        It’s much easier to respect this regulation by using wood rather than concrete so we see more and more wooden constructions now.

      • @Noodle07
        link
        11 year ago

        With clay bricks! That’s a fa’cy one

        • @lunarul
          link
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s most likely Porotherm bricks, which are cheaper. And the even cheaper version is with AAC bricks like this

      • @MrJameGumbOP
        link
        71 year ago

        That appears to be a military bunker of some sort

          • [email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I’m pretty sure you’re supposed to be in a full suit with a respirator, mask and whatnot to spray this shit.

        • @scottywh
          link
          41 year ago

          I was thinking more like a commercial building than a residential.

    • @Tikiporch
      link
      31 year ago

      I understand a lot of homes in Europe are not well insulated, and weren’t built with it in mind. Climate change is causing problems with this design deficit.

    • @banneryear1868
      link
      31 year ago

      It’s not like it’s a “wood house” though just the framing is softwood lumber. The foundation is reinforced poured concrete, there’s steel support braces, the ties and hardware are likely zinc coated steel, roof is asphalt shingles or steel, wind bracing is lumber or steel rods depending on code, could even have exterior brick or vinyl siding.