• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Always amses me to see you guys build your wood houses. This looks so much like a construction game for children, I want to play too!

    • Ophy
      link
      fedilink
      431 year ago

      I live on a fault line along the pacific ring of fire, and so building with wood was an absolute necessity for us so long, as they were structurally more lenient to the constant earthquakes. Even now I believe our old government building is the largest wooden building in the Southern hemisphere (and it’s only 4 stories tall). These days as construction techniques have changed, we’ve obviously built things with concrete, steel, brick, etc., but the wooden tradition remains strong, with a huge majority of modern houses here still being built like this.

      That aside, wood was also just a much cheaper material to build with, so it was the most economical material to use for a long time for much of the “new world”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        Right. Buildings were mostly wood and mud in Europe until the 18th Century. By then, cities became so dense that big fires were extremely deadly. Little by little people started building in stone, then bricks and now reinforced concrete.

        • @droans
          link
          121 year ago

          It didn’t really have anything to do with fires. Pretty much every hardwood forest was cut down in Europe and any remaining were protected so they could be used to build ships.

          America was colonized late enough that it never really became an issue.

          • @banneryear1868
            link
            21 year ago

            Yeah exactly they basically stripped their continent bare of lumber during that period and it’s all at the bottom of the ocean now. The materials used are just as much determined by economic conditions as practicality.

    • @MrJameGumbOP
      link
      311 year ago

      you guys build your wood houses

      What do you normally build houses with?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        511 year ago

        Here in Europe, we use mostly cinder blocks or bricks. I guess wood is more common in Northern Europe and Switzerland

        • @proudblond
          link
          421 year ago

          In California we use wood because it flexes during earthquakes. There may be damage during a big one but at least the house is less likely to collapse on you.

          • @MrsDoyle
            link
            241 year ago

            In earthquakes in NZ the wooden houses flex for sure. What kills you is the brick chimney falling through the roof.

            • @jcit878
              link
              51 year ago

              isnt brick an excellent insulator?

                  • @RubberElectrons
                    link
                    31 year ago

                    Pretty neat, I’ve never seen masonry like this before.

                    I’ll point out that the webbing is likely strong, but considering the lack of ductility, this seems likely to fail during an earthquake. What’re these called, I’d like to look into them more.

                • @jcit878
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  i was so sure it was, i looked it up after seeing your comment and… you are right. even double brick which ive always been told was great, apparently isnt all that good. TIL

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            In Europe we use reinforced concrete for the same purpose. Don’t know if it works but it’s the way it’s done.

          • @lunarul
            link
            -91 year ago

            And also because there’s no snow or serious rain. Took me years to get used to the flimsy houses here, they wouldn’t last a year back in my country.

            • @SuperIce
              link
              English
              161 year ago

              I don’t know about that. I’ve lived in a typical “flimsy” American wooden house in an area that had a lot of crazy weather with extreme winds and even a couple of tropical storms. That house had absolutely no issue with those. These houses are a lot stronger than they look. They flex but don’t break.

              • Captain Aggravated
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                My house is 80 years old, I’ve personally seen 3 feet of snow on its roof, it weathered hurricane Fran with no damage, hurricane Matthew caused a leak around the chimney that stained my living room ceiling a little.

                I’m ready to take anything this area is willing to throw at me except tornadoes. A direct strike by tornado will pull it down.

            • @Stoney_Logica1
              link
              14
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I live in the Pacific Northwest where it rains quite a bit. Wood houses are fine in the rain as long as the moisture barrier and roof have been installed correctly.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              111 year ago

              Canada also builds houses out of wood. There’s pretty serious snow here and the houses work great.

              I also live in one of the the windiest cities in Canada . The asphalt shingles have blown off houses frequently, but the houses themselves are solid.

              • @lunarul
                link
                -3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m pretty sure those wooden houses in Canada are built differently from wooden houses in California. The ones I’ve seen are thin wooden struts covered with some drywall.

                Edit: and just saying “flimsy” by comparison to the usual reinforced concrete structures back home. I now own a home in California and it’s definitely solid.

                • @schmidtster
                  link
                  71 year ago

                  So funnily enough, 2x4 exterior walls meet code for 3 stories, but where I am, it doesn’t meet the insulation requirements of minimum r-20, so it’s normally built with 2x6.

              • @lunarul
                link
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I know it is possible to build solid houses out of wood. The ones I’m talking about would 100% not withstand blizzards or tornadoes.

                Like most in my native country, I grew up in a building made entirely of solid reinforced concrete slabs, including most interior walls. I could not hear my upstairs or downstairs neighbors and when I saw people punching holes in the walls in American movies I thought it’s just an exaggeration, not something that can actually happen. Wooden houses were culturally associated with poor rural people who couldn’t afford living in a nice solid apartment. That culture persists today, and even in isolated villages new homes are built with concrete structures and brick walls.

                When I bought a piece of land and was looking at options for new houses, I found a company making very solid wooden homes (still a lot more solid than the average Bay Area home) for reasonable prices and both my and my wife’s families were outraged at the idea of building a house out of wood.

                Just some random background to why I’d use the word “flimsy” for wooden struts sandwiched between drywall sheets.

        • Dandroid
          link
          fedilink
          171 year ago

          If we did that in the US west coast, they would crack and fall apart from tectonic plate shift. You need to build things to be flexible for earthquakes and general shift.

          • @I_Fart_Glitter
            link
            111 year ago

            I live in a 100 year old farm house in California and every spring and fall we have to move the strike plate (thing the door latch nubbin goes into) on the front door up or down about 3/4 inch due to seasonal house shifting. The door stops closing and we know it’s spring time!

            • @schmidtster
              link
              101 year ago

              The structure would still be damaged, although it may be “standing”.

              It doesn’t work, it’s been tested plenty by people far smarter than either of us.

            • Dandroid
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              It would stick crack and crumble around the steel. It wouldn’t work here, which is why it against building codes here.

          • qyron
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            That’s a really poor argument to pass down to people.

            Solutions exist to make buildings earthquake resilient and the USA created a good part of it.

            Vibration dampeners, structure stress relievers, special mortars and concretes, specific structural geometry, etc.

            There is no reason why the US should keep its attachment to wood construction. Tornado alley would vastly improve if house were to shift from match sticks and hope to brick and mortar with reinforced concrete foundations.

            • Dandroid
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Tornado alley is a completely different part of the US than the West Coast, which is specifically what I was talking about. It’s like 2000 miles away. Tornado alley doesn’t have earthquakes, so this discussion doesn’t even apply to that. Bust now that were talking about it, in tornado alley, houses at least do have a brick exterior around the wood.

              • qyron
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I picked Tornado Alley because it’s low hanging fruit; I’ll get to that again.

                USA has a fixation for wood construction, completely unreasonable and unjustifiable. There are several countries and regions in the world with sysmic activity that do not opt to build in wood.

                Japan sits atop a zone of tectonic plate subduction. Hearthquakes are not unknown to them and they build with modern materials. Tokyo, with its extreme population density, is built to withstand earthquakes and hurricanes. Are the USA dumber than Japan?

                Regarding Hurricane Alley, wrapping a woodframe with brick doesn’t make the structure sturdier, just makes it heavier and more prone to break under stress, as the brick work won’t have structural role.

                A properly built modern brick or block structure has a super structure reinforced with rebar and concrete, which then receives the brick/block work to finish the building, with some walls being part of the superstructure of the building. This forms a monolithic construction that tends to be very stuborn and stays in place unless something blows it to pieces. Older buildings used other techniques, usually tied to the brickwork itself to create load bearing structures.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          151 year ago

          That’s because Europe has had many more centuries worth of deforestation. The greatest resource the Americas had to offer to Europe was essentially unlimited lumber.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And we wasted a lot of our forests on superfluous things like war ships - see the Castillan plateau which is now a dry and barren land.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Once you’ve destroyed an ecosystem, it takes a lot of effort to bring back. Often you can’t just expect to plant the same type of trees as before and expect it to take.

                There are ways to introduce things gradually, but it’s not an on/off switch.

                • @DarthBueller
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  Plus there are entire keystone species of trees that blights drove to actual or morphological extinction. I don’t know about European species, but the mountains of appalachia used to be covered in massive American Chestnut trees that were so big around at the trunk they were on par with west coast species. After the blight, you can still find groves of chestnut trees, but its like they’re a different species - they live 7-9 years and die basically around the time they first mast. They never live long enough to really leave the sapling phase.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In Florida houses are also built from cinder blocks because wood is too weak against hurricanes.

          Edit: interiors can be built from wood, but all exterior walls are made with cinder blocks.

          • @schmidtster
            link
            101 year ago

            Exteriors are wood too, hurricane straps. Basically metal connectors connect everything from ground across the roof to the ground again.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              What part of Florida? I know there’s different wind speed ratings depending on how far north you’re building. In South Florida I only ever saw cinder block or full concrete exteriors.

              • @schmidtster
                link
                21 year ago

                It should be compliant everywhere, maybe a particular municipality has specific restrictions though.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Same in the Caribbean. Houses and buildings made of concrete to survive hurricanes. Windows may blow out but the walls stay firm.

          • @NewNewAccount
            link
            91 year ago

            Interesting. Here in California, building brick structures is prohibited because of the risk during earthquakes.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              I’m actually living in California now. Very different structures to the buildings. Houses are much smaller overall too. But the landscape is so much nicer to look at and explore. I never realized how boring and flat Florida was until I left.

        • @MrJameGumbOP
          link
          41 year ago

          We have plenty of brick houses here too, but they all are still built around wooden frames for the most part

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Wood is becoming popular for new constructions in France too.

          With the new regulations you need to limit the amount of CO2 emitted for building and maintaining the house.

          It’s much easier to respect this regulation by using wood rather than concrete so we see more and more wooden constructions now.

        • @Noodle07
          link
          11 year ago

          With clay bricks! That’s a fa’cy one

          • @lunarul
            link
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s most likely Porotherm bricks, which are cheaper. And the even cheaper version is with AAC bricks like this

        • @MrJameGumbOP
          link
          71 year ago

          That appears to be a military bunker of some sort

            • [email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I’m pretty sure you’re supposed to be in a full suit with a respirator, mask and whatnot to spray this shit.

          • @scottywh
            link
            41 year ago

            I was thinking more like a commercial building than a residential.

      • @banneryear1868
        link
        31 year ago

        It’s not like it’s a “wood house” though just the framing is softwood lumber. The foundation is reinforced poured concrete, there’s steel support braces, the ties and hardware are likely zinc coated steel, roof is asphalt shingles or steel, wind bracing is lumber or steel rods depending on code, could even have exterior brick or vinyl siding.

      • @Tikiporch
        link
        31 year ago

        I understand a lot of homes in Europe are not well insulated, and weren’t built with it in mind. Climate change is causing problems with this design deficit.

    • @ChocoboRocket
      link
      71 year ago

      Wouldn’t the inside of your house still have wood framing structure like this though? Looks like this neighbourhood uses vinyl siding, but you could easily have a brick/stone/stucco exterior.

      Isn’t it way harder to run plumbing/electric through cinder blocks, let alone hanging drywall? Or do you build a cinderblock box first and then frame the inside with wood?

      This place looks like it doesn’t have a basement, which is a must in Canada, and all our basements are generally concrete pour or cinderblocks, but we still have framing on the inside walls, and usually everything above the basement is wood + facade

      • @MrJameGumbOP
        link
        81 year ago

        Where I am in South Carolina very few people have basements as they would be prone to flooding

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Interestingly enough, I was contemplating the amount of sand used in cinder blocks vs tabby.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Wouldn’t the inside of your house still have wood framing structure like this though? Extremely rare. Most houses built until the 1959s are made of stone and mortar, with walls at least 2 feet wide. In Northern Europe, i.e. UK, Belgium, Netherlands, parts of France and Germany, you would fund brick and mortar walls. Interior walls were built with thin hollow bricks assembled with mortar. These houses are a pain to renovate and most people just put everything agaisntbthe existing walls and then glue their drywalls on top of it with adhesive mortar. Since then, it is mostly cinder blocks or hollow brichs that are then filled with concrete. Modern building regulations impose steel reinforcement in regions prone to earthquakes. Interior walls are built with a framing of steel railings that are very light and flexible when handled but very sturdy when assembled. The drywall is screwed on each side of these rails which gives room for electrical and plumbung.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Isn’t it way harder to run plumbing/electric through cinder blocks, let alone hanging drywall? Or do you build a cinderblock box first and then frame the inside with wood?

        At least in South America (where most buildings are made of brick and mortar) there’s no drywall. The internal finish is a smooth layer on top of the bricks and that’s it. That makes it easier to hang heavy things on the wall but also makes it impossible to run wires of any kind. It also makes repairs more difficult.

        • setVeryLoud(true);
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Our schools in North America are mostly built like this. I think the bricks are hollow, so they can run power, but most things reside inside the drop ceiling.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Typically, yes. In the US at least, cinder block houses are common particularly in Florida and coastal regions. The inside would still likely have a moisture barrier and insulation on modern homes, so you will typically have wood framing for interior walls to allow for wiring, plumbing, and insulation that is then drywalled over.

    • @CoriolisSTORM88
      link
      41 year ago

      I’m genuinely curious. I am in the southern US, Alabama specifically with the heat and humidity that entails. There are cinder block homes here, but they’re mostly looked down upon and almost always have mold and mildew problems. How is that handled with brick and mortar or concrete construction?

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Double walls, with thermal insulation, external vapor barrier and built in ventilation ducts. Special additives for the mortars prevent moisture from seeping into the walls. Double or even triple pane windows and good quality, properly applied exterior paint reinforces the insulation.

        • @CoriolisSTORM88
          link
          11 year ago

          Most of the ones I’ve seen don’t have most of, or any of this. I’d suspect that’s the problem.

          • qyron
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ll risk the ones you’re used to see are single wall, probably bare block and perhaps poorly cobbled together, as if they were sheds or something alike.

            Far off the mark?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I don’t see why brick and mortar houses should be extra susceptible to those problems if build well. But of course Europe didn’t use to see the same extremes of heat and humidity as the US does, perhaps it will become a problem in the future.

        • @CoriolisSTORM88
          link
          11 year ago

          You got it right I suspect. Most of these that I’ve seen are a single course of blocks with no discernible vapor barrier or anything. And maybe a thin layer of paint.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -271 year ago

      Brick manufacturing devastates the environment. We build our houses from sustainable resources.because we’re not cavemen.

      • Saganastic
        link
        fedilink
        221 year ago

        We build our houses from trees because we have lots of trees.

      • @Quaiche
        link
        111 year ago

        Meanwhile most of your energy sources are not renewable and per capita the average emissions of the American is double or even triple of the average European.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Why the aggressive tone? Each technique has its advantages. I guess brick and mortar houses would burn less in California, which has the same climate as Italy and Spain

        • mommykink
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Whether or not the house burns to the ground is irrelevant when the damage caused by the heat alone would condemn a brick/stone house in the US. At least wood frame houses can be easily tore down and rebuilt.

      • @leotonius
        link
        11 year ago

        That is not the reasoning at all.

        Places generally build with whatever sensical building material they have most widely available. If there are a ton of forests, they probably build with wood. If there’s a ton of stone, they probably build with stone.

        You’re wrong, and honestly kind of a dick.