• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19211 months ago

      Elon Musk could have actually done something for humanity and build two of those instead of buying Twitter.

      • @Acters
        link
        English
        8911 months ago

        Dude literally owns a boring company, he could have ate the cost of digging the tunnel to specifications and still have more money than buying xitter

        • @Necromnomicon
          link
          English
          8411 months ago

          Yea but his boring company isn’t particularly useful for anything other than stymieing public transportation programs by acquiring contracts with cities and then doing nothing with them. Almost like he has an interest in selling more cars than expand public transit… allegedly.

          • Fuck spez
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1611 months ago

            Not even allegedly. I could be wrong but I thought he admitted publicly at one point that was the whole idea behind The Boring Co. It might have even been on Rogan. Anyone remember or have a clip? Jamie, pull that up.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1611 months ago

              I think was a biographer, who wrote that the “hyperloop” project existed only to sabotage California’s high speed train project.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          Yeah but where is the short term ego boost in that? He needs his dopamine NOW!

      • @ChicoSuave
        link
        English
        4711 months ago

        And he’s driven the value down below the price of one collider. He’s lost an entire super collider!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2011 months ago

        You may not realize this, but the twitter money still exists. The former owners of twitter have it under their mattress right now, why don’t they build a supercollider?

    • @arin
      link
      English
      5311 months ago

      Upkeep might be expensive, but 22 billion is probably lower bound estimation, highly likely to 5x that at least

        • @WhiteHawk
          link
          English
          5111 months ago

          This is Switzerland you’re talking about, they make money when people get killed

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Understood, the world needs to kill more brown people, so we can afford rare particles . ***not my opinion

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          That would be too hard, but we can just try and save some money on useless things and if people don’t accept cutting benefits just raise the interest rates, all of them are underwater anyway

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Man, that’s just not in the budget. How am I supposed to scratch my need-to-kill-brown-kids itch without the taxpayer money we specifically set aside for this purpose?

          What kind of absurd ideas are you gonna come up with next? No more instigating strife in the middle east? Pah! Not on my watch!

          /s

      • @CheeseNoodle
        link
        English
        27
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Pff the UK is spending that on a 70 mile railway thats going to be slower than the one already there, already spent nearly 2x the projected FCC budget on just 6 miles of the fucking thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2111 months ago

      Fucking hell, we can’t get a tramway for 10b CAD around here and a 12km tunnel under a river was going to cost half a 100km collider 😐

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1811 months ago

      First rule in government spending: why build one when you can have two at twice the price?

    • @uis
      link
      English
      1311 months ago

      I don’t remember where I heard that science is super cheap, but I did not belive it first. Some time later I see that it is.

      • @petersr
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        I guess everything is relative.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2411 months ago

        That’s actually surprising that NASA only has 50% more budget than a single particle accelerator, given the huge number of cutting edge projects NASA is working on.

      • @psycho_driver
        link
        English
        2011 months ago

        Money spent fighting a morally justifiable war with Russia that we aren’t actually having to fight is money well spent IMO.

      • @daellat
        link
        English
        1111 months ago

        They have mostly given stuff they weren’t going to use anymore worth that amount when bought new.

      • @psmgx
        link
        English
        811 months ago

        How many people has the moon killed? Cuz Russia has killed tens of thousands. They’ve lost on the order of 250k of their own guys, and probably inflicted roughly the same numbers on the AFU.

        The moon doesn’t kill old ladies sitting in their apartment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 months ago

        This initial budget estimate is 44x the 500M initial estimate of the jwst for comparison. Jwst eventually ballooned to 20B, but I’m guessing this would similarly balloon over time as well.