• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1921 year ago

      Elon Musk could have actually done something for humanity and build two of those instead of buying Twitter.

      • @Acters
        link
        English
        891 year ago

        Dude literally owns a boring company, he could have ate the cost of digging the tunnel to specifications and still have more money than buying xitter

        • @Necromnomicon
          link
          English
          841 year ago

          Yea but his boring company isn’t particularly useful for anything other than stymieing public transportation programs by acquiring contracts with cities and then doing nothing with them. Almost like he has an interest in selling more cars than expand public transit… allegedly.

          • Fuck spez
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 year ago

            Not even allegedly. I could be wrong but I thought he admitted publicly at one point that was the whole idea behind The Boring Co. It might have even been on Rogan. Anyone remember or have a clip? Jamie, pull that up.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              161 year ago

              I think was a biographer, who wrote that the “hyperloop” project existed only to sabotage California’s high speed train project.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Yeah but where is the short term ego boost in that? He needs his dopamine NOW!

      • @ChicoSuave
        link
        English
        471 year ago

        And he’s driven the value down below the price of one collider. He’s lost an entire super collider!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        You may not realize this, but the twitter money still exists. The former owners of twitter have it under their mattress right now, why don’t they build a supercollider?

    • @arin
      link
      English
      531 year ago

      Upkeep might be expensive, but 22 billion is probably lower bound estimation, highly likely to 5x that at least

        • @WhiteHawk
          link
          English
          511 year ago

          This is Switzerland you’re talking about, they make money when people get killed

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Understood, the world needs to kill more brown people, so we can afford rare particles . ***not my opinion

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          That would be too hard, but we can just try and save some money on useless things and if people don’t accept cutting benefits just raise the interest rates, all of them are underwater anyway

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Man, that’s just not in the budget. How am I supposed to scratch my need-to-kill-brown-kids itch without the taxpayer money we specifically set aside for this purpose?

          What kind of absurd ideas are you gonna come up with next? No more instigating strife in the middle east? Pah! Not on my watch!

          /s

      • @CheeseNoodle
        link
        English
        27
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pff the UK is spending that on a 70 mile railway thats going to be slower than the one already there, already spent nearly 2x the projected FCC budget on just 6 miles of the fucking thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Fucking hell, we can’t get a tramway for 10b CAD around here and a 12km tunnel under a river was going to cost half a 100km collider 😐

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      First rule in government spending: why build one when you can have two at twice the price?

    • @uis
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      I don’t remember where I heard that science is super cheap, but I did not belive it first. Some time later I see that it is.

      • @petersr
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I guess everything is relative.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        241 year ago

        That’s actually surprising that NASA only has 50% more budget than a single particle accelerator, given the huge number of cutting edge projects NASA is working on.

      • @psycho_driver
        link
        English
        201 year ago

        Money spent fighting a morally justifiable war with Russia that we aren’t actually having to fight is money well spent IMO.

      • @daellat
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        They have mostly given stuff they weren’t going to use anymore worth that amount when bought new.

      • @psmgx
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        How many people has the moon killed? Cuz Russia has killed tens of thousands. They’ve lost on the order of 250k of their own guys, and probably inflicted roughly the same numbers on the AFU.

        The moon doesn’t kill old ladies sitting in their apartment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        This initial budget estimate is 44x the 500M initial estimate of the jwst for comparison. Jwst eventually ballooned to 20B, but I’m guessing this would similarly balloon over time as well.

  • @Ensign_Crab
    link
    English
    2061 year ago

    Guys, the trick is to get it partially built and then cancel funding. Then scientists will never trust you to fund anything ever again, and you get to act like science is a waste of money while you’re spending ridiculous sums on fighter jets.

    Yes, I am still bitter about Waxahatchie.

      • @Zehzin
        link
        English
        211 year ago

        It would be badass if it was literally

        • wjrii
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          With all the development around Waxahachie, Midlothian, and Ennis, There’s a very good chance that many backyards are now built over the loop’s proposed path.

      • @TheHighRoad
        link
        English
        141 year ago

        It’s really sad as a clear landmark on the map of the US’s descent into scientific irrelevancy on the world stage.

        “If there was demand, the market would have built it!”

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would have loved for the SSSC to have been built as well. It probably wouldn’t have found the highs boson till 2010 or maybe as early as 2009. The computer technology of the 90s would have severely limited the things ability to be understood. CERN creates GB of data per second. I can’t imagine what that thing would have done, and then we need to be able to process that much so we can filter out the noise.

      I was 12 when it was announced that they weren’t gonna finish buildt it, and even though I was just a kid in IN, something shattered for me that day. That was almost as bad as watching Challenger.

    • snowe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      That project put my dad out of business. Government gave him (part of) the contract, he did a bunch of work for years and then poof, project gone, not gonna pay you for it.

    • @GenesisJones
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I was looking for this comment lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Budget: Military Complex > CERN

    Long term value to citizens: CERN > Miltary Complex

    All historical CERN expenses combined are a tiny fraction of the yearly expenses of the combined EU miltary

    • @Zehzin
      link
      English
      1201 year ago

      But particles don’t make my dick feel big

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      US Congress: Audit NASA > Audit the Pentagon

      EU: Audit CERN > Audit Luxemborg/Malta/UK

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      I’m just amazed that funding $22 billion is even an issue when the project is being backed by the EU, and partially the US, since we never built ours…

      That’s a rounding error for both entities

      • @Landmammals
        link
        English
        501 year ago

        If you ask the scientists in my local Facebook group, it could kill all of them. That is, the ones not already killed by vaccines and 5G.

        • @Shanedino
          link
          English
          161 year ago

          It confirmed lyrics true that 100% of vaccinated people will die.

    • DrQuickbeam
      link
      English
      301 year ago

      The feds give the states more than $16b per year to build and run shitty, custom made IT systems for their Medicaid programs. It’s basically a subsidy to IT companies. There are thousands of examples like this, where spending money on fundamental science is clearly a better investment.

    • @Chobbes
      link
      English
      301 year ago

      I was kind of thinking that $22 billion really doesn’t seem like that much money for a project like this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    881 year ago

    Remember when people were worried about these killing us all by creating a black hole that swallows the Earth?

    Can this one just hurry up and do that please?

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    871 year ago

    I’d rather spend 22 billion on this than in Israel or more weapons of war

    • @RoyaltyInTraining
      link
      English
      301 year ago

      We have wasted way more money on way stupider projects. Would love to see this built rather than the military getting even more money.

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Hyperloop was known high schooler nonsense from the start, at least this will get something back, whatever it is.

  • @Yokozuna
    link
    English
    82
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fun fact, they were going to build one in the US crossing the borders of LA, TX, AR. They even dug out the damn hole, but they shit canned the whole project so now we’re just left with a random giant circular hole underground.

    Edited AK to AR. That would have been a bit excessive.

    • @misterundercoat
      link
      English
      301 year ago

      I think I saw this in an anime once. Something to do with a big Philosopher Stone or something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      Not quite circular, they only got 26% of the tunnel dug. Still, 23 km is quite a long tunnel to leave sitting empty

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        241 year ago

        Fill it with cheese. Make another cheese vault. We require the cheese. Government cheese. Cheese.

        • @Thrashy
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          Alas, I don’t think he will much care to build a subway-but-shitty between one farm outside Waxahachie, TX, to another farm outside of Waxahachie, TX. Not enough density of mouthbreathing Elon stans there.

      • @Yokozuna
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Thanks for clearing that up, I thought I was finished or near completion. Glad they decided to stop production when they did but sucks that we didn’t get it.

      • @Yokozuna
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        This is awesome thanks for sharing.

      • @Custard
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Love me a Bobby video. Can’t wait for nortel part 2

      • @RealFknNito
        link
        English
        121 year ago

        Every time we get close to a science victory our military advisor finds another war to divert production to…

      • @Yokozuna
        link
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yea sometimes I’m pretty dumb. Gona edit the correct abbreviations now lol

    • @SirQuackTheDuck
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      Sounds very much like how I build my homes in Minecraft

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They should have built it crossing the border of TX and MX, that would have been really popular ;)

      Ps I’m not a Trumpian, just making a joke :)

  • Cyrus Draegur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    821 year ago

    i hope someday we construct a collider that spans the entire circumference of the earth. But we’d probably have to build one that spans the circumference of the moon first, and then maybe mars, since the oceans are going to be a bit of a doozie to work around that we don’t have the technology for, whereas the interior of a collider is supposed to be evacuated, so, the moon almost kinda already handles that for us. heat might be an issue of course, but if we can figure out thermal radiator panels that can dump the heat straight into space, maybe we could pull it off…

    mars would address the heat issues, but those dust storms are no joke and the dust itself is microscopic toxic/caustic razors and it’ll try to get in everywhere and ruin fine instruments it touches. Moon dust is also really bad but there’s no wind to kick it up on the moon obviously…

    but damn. DAMN. imagine the fucking science we could get done with a LUNAR-SCALE PARTICLE COLLIDER!!!

    • @Evotech
      link
      English
      431 year ago

      Halo

      Just gonna throw that out there

    • @Zehzin
      link
      English
      361 year ago

      Fuck it, orbital collider. Earth deserves a cool ring

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Now I’m imagining placing a ring of gigantic dyson-sphere powered magnets in an intergalactic void to create the final and ultimate supercollider, the size of a galactic supercluster

      • Cyrus Draegur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        that would legitimately be so fucking cool, but I think at those scales we’re actually encroaching on things that truly are physically impossible. If it takes light entire geological eras to move through such a system, any hope of maintaining physical integrity throughout its length is … exceedingly unlikely. Like, at ranges THAT vast, pretty sure the expansion of spacetime itself would rip it open…

        … but i’m still enjoying imagining it :3

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Does it actually have to maintain physical integrity as a single structure? If it’s not got a vacuum chamber due to relying on the ambient vacuum, then each section of magnets need not physically touch, so the individual components need only use some of the energy from their power source to actively steer themselves into formation rather than rely on material strength to hold together.

          • Cyrus Draegur
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I would expect so on the basis of precision. At scales that large, space itself becomes an unreliable medium…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Also, maybe add some biomes, oceans and wildlife. And absolutely no parasitic life forms trapped in there.

        • @Quadhammer
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Hear me out okay. hits blunt Dyson ring. Maybe we start building it out between earth and Mars. We dig a big ass hole into Mars core and use some kind of laser technology to focus radiation into it perhaps “jump starting” the core. Or maybe we use some kind of cable and gymbal system to run a hard wire into it. hits blunt Then meanwhile we’re crashing comets and shit into it to get us some oceans and atmosphere, badabing badaboom we got earth 2.0

          • Cyrus Draegur
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Well check this out: if it’s big enough and can collect enough solar energy, it can be a self-powered gargantuan electromagnet and CREATE a magnetosphere for Mars itself. And the moon has a higher silver content than earth, which a) won’t tarnish in the vacuum of space and b) is more conductive than copper or gold!

            Aluminum alloy structures, silver circuitry, we could build this thing without sending ANY of it’s raw materials from earth. It’s all already up there waiting for us… … Some assembly required :p

            • @Quadhammer
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              I’m sorry I’m just now seeing this reply because that is fascinating

    • @marcos
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      There’s probably opportunity to do some really large colliders in space, for much cheaper than on any celestial body.

      But then, people are having a really hard time imagining the fucking science we could get done with a lunar-scale particle collider. That’s why the merely 100km one isn’t getting any money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Moon’s daytime is half a month long and can reach 120 C so we’d need some pretty powerful heat shielding. And there’s no ozone layer to protect the electronics from radiation, and I’m pretty sure the Moon orbits outside of Earth’s magnetosphere. And the shielding used for such a project could also be used to fix climate change here (and terraform Venus later) with orbital parasols. And whatever unimaginable technology we’d need for such an ambitious project may as well be used to run a grid of electromagnets and power lines across Mars to give it a magnetic field

    • @KittyCat
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      If gravatons are a real particle, we’d need one on on the order of earths orbit around the sun to see it. Maybe someday lol.

      • @Donjuanme
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Or a different mechanism of detection,

      • @grue
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        I think on earth is preferential

        Something something “resonance cascade.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Even underground there is tons of issues. One for example is that the ground is having tides.

        As the moon passes above is the ground is moving by several cm so it has to be compensated by the collider.

      • @cynar
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        At the energies involved, it’s akin to a bacteria interfering with a supersonic goods train. The only bit that needs shielding is the detector systems, and that’s not THAT hard to do in space. At least if you’re at the point of building a space based accelerator.

  • @Starkstruck
    link
    English
    381 year ago

    I’d rather spend money on science than killing innocent people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Imagine if only 1/10 of all countries GDP gouvernement spending went to scientists and the patent bullshit didn’t exist ? We’d be mining asteroids and sipping coffee on Mars.

    • @TyrionsNose
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      This comment doesn’t even make sense. For example, the USA government spent 37% compared to the GDP.

      If you mean 10% of government spending towards science then that question makes sense.

      The USA spends about $75billion of the $800billion defense budget on R&D. It spends another $120billion on non-defense R&D.

      Which is about 1/31 of federal spending for the US.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Thanks for the correction. I never knew what word to use and used GDP because that’s the closest thing to what I mean. Thanks again !

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Honestly I thought your original comment was refering to basic science so the 10% would be huge.

      • @Zehzin
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Would be neat if they found a way to only spend like 200 billion a year (the GDP of Hungary and as much as the second biggest military spender) on the people grinder.

        • @TyrionsNose
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          But we spend nearly $200 billion just paying salaries. We spend the most because we are also an expensive country to live in and that means paying the folks who volunteer a decent wage.

          We would have to significantly downsize the military personnel and pretty much operate as homeland defense only.

          • @Zehzin
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            That sounds great

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I don’t think even a purely defensive military could be that small for the US. We have a lot of coastline on two oceans, plus distant holdings in Alaska and Hawaii. Even discharging Guam and the like would still be a lot of ground and ocean to cover.

          • @Zehzin
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            My googling says the US spent/185b on the DHS for this year and has 100b for FY2024, which includes the stupid mexico wall. I’m sure there would be more things to deal with not included in that number and it would take time to transition, but any reduction is a positive gain if you ask me.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Venus would take longer, but would be vastly easier to terraform to a habitable world. The atmosphere should be able to be transformed into an earth like atmosphere by dumping a few comets and some bacteria in. Might take the bacteria a few thousand years, but they did it here in Earth caused the first mass extinction.

      We might wanna check to see if any bacteria exist on Venus first, but honestly if there are, they haven’t made the evolutionary jump in the last 4 billion years, so I doubt it will happen just cause we add the necessary water.

      While we are at it, we may as well solve the dark forest problem, turn the solar system into a massive spaceship, and extend the life of our sun, by turning Mercury into a solar thruster/ star lifter.

      • @Olhonestjim
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m partial to the idea of converting Mercury into a star lifter / thruster / planetary shade. Blocking sunlight to Venus would cause the atmosphere to cool, then freeze and fall as snow. Then you can disassemble Venus too for more raw material. That’s a massive store of carbon, oxygen, and sulfur. Solar powered mass drivers operating out of a planetary vacuum cut costs of launching material into space.

        People often object to the idea because we can’t afford it, it’s too difficult, or out of concern for preserving those planets. Yeah, we won’t be doing all that. It will be our descendants in the far future. A task for new civilizations, over eons. Discovering life on Mercury and Venus is a long shot. But if it is there, it’s doomed without human intervention. Convert those two planets to Dyson swarm, and they’ll have matter for countless orbital habitats, not just for whoever humans evolve into, but for nature preserves too.

        I’ve watched a bunch of Isaac Arthur.

        • @AngryCommieKender
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Don’t disassemble Venus. That planet is far too easy to terraform. Disassemble Mars, asteroids, and the various otherwise useless moons, comets, asteroids, and proto-planets in the heliosphere

          Take a look at my other comment in this thread.

          https://lemmy.world/comment/5171378

          • @Olhonestjim
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Dont worry dude, I won’t. I promise. 😆

            Well, I understand the argument for terraforming, and I’d bet good money we will terraform it long before disassembly, but I’m more of an O’Neil Cylinder / Dyson Swarm kind of guy. I prefer the idea of overwhelming surface area via orbital habitats rather than colonizing gravity wells. I also don’t trust Venus not to catastrophically resurface itself and refill the atmosphere with CO2 and sulphuric acid in a mass volcanic event.

            Long term, but far too soon the Sun will expand into a red giant and devour Mercury, Venus, and likely Earth as well. If it’s possible to employ a Dyson Swarm to lift material from a star to reduce its mass, then it may be feasible to prevent or mitigate the red giant phase to preserve Earth and extend its habitability, perhaps indefinitely. If preserving the birthplace of known life seems more important than building a copy in a more precarious orbit, then we ought to sacrifice that copy to expand the Dyson Swarm and mine the Sun faster. Mercury first though. We’ve got time. Mars can probably go too.

            Oh yes, and if the notion of slowly altering Earth’s orbit by tossing asteroids past us ever needs to happen, then surely rapid firing 2 or 3 planets worth of material across our bow ought to get the job done much faster.

            Considering the eons involved with stripping both inward planets down to the last bucketful though, I’m certainly in favor of a few millennia to fully explore and research them both beforehand.

            • @AngryCommieKender
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              A properly configured solar thruster doubles as a starlifting platform. Kurzgesagt has a video on is as well as PBS Spacetime

      • @Donjuanme
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m not seeing why the same couldn’t be said for Mars, drop some mold spores and water bears down there, maybe some photosynthetic bacteria, slowly build a blanket of CO2 to warm the planet, melt/release the water from the surface, a thousand years gives a habitable planet, no asteroid steering required.

        • @AngryCommieKender
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Mars is roughly a single order of magnitude larger than The Moon, in mass. The Earth is roughly 81 times the mass of The Moon. Mars doesn’t have a magnetic field protecting it, and can’t unless we add a significant amount of metals, and mass to the planet. It also doesn’t have an atmosphere due to the two previous facts.

          Meanwhile, Venus is roughly the size of The Earth at a scale of 4.8673 : 5.97222. It doesn’t have enough water though. It also doesn’t have a large iron core to create a magnetic field to protect the inhabitants. However, we could re-route several comets fairly easily to impact Venus giving it a small amount of mass, but also all the water that is needed to start the bacteria creating a Nitrogen rich atmosphere that has a large percentage of Oxygen, turning Venus into a tropical planet that will lose its atmosphere in a few billion years. To counteract this, as we throw 20-30 comets at Venus, we should also throw 100-200 Iron rich asteroids at Venus so that they will be absorbed into the molten core and form a magnetic field for Venus.

          Now we have 2 Earth-like planets in a few hundred to thousand years.

          To create such a gravitational well on Mars, so that we aren’t constantly losing both our normal skeletural muscles, but also more importantly, our organ muscles, you would have to create a stable black hole in the core of Mars, or you would have to bombard Mars, and its pathetic moons, with millions of asteroids.

          To create a long term naturally stable, new earth, Venus is just closer to the masses that we actually need. By dropping just the comets onto Venus you just added a lot of mass, and that gets Venus even closer to being “Earth-like.” We will have to give Venus a comparative moon, but with asteroid mining, and starlifting, that shouldn’t be an issue.

          By using Mercury to create a solar thruster, we gain access to unlimited space dust, that will form unlimited asteroids for us, in the Kuiper Belt.

    • @FastAndBulbous
      link
      English
      -11 year ago

      It’s all fine calling patents bullshit until you start getting large corporations stealing technology from small and medium enterprises.

      The way to ensure that large corporations and no small businesses can thrive have an even bigger monopoly is to get rid of the patent system.

      Tired of this shit on Lemmy. Do your homework.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        It’s currently used to monopolize important discoveries and technologies. The Huawei debacle is the biggest proof. No country should be able to control another’s technological advance based on weither they’re friends with them at the moment or not. Also, it’s not like big tech stealing from small/medium enterprise never happens. Either they just buy the company or strangle it one way or another to bankrupt it and then buy it for cheap.

        • @FastAndBulbous
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          You make the patents too easy to get and it fucks the little guy over as the big corps hoover up all the ideas. You make them difficult or impossible to get then that also benefits the big guys over the little guys as they will just steal people’s ideas and produce them for cheaper with their existing infrastructure which creates an even bigger monopoly.

          There is a sweet spot that society is trying to reach. It’s imperfect like any system but it’s far far better than having no system.

          You’ve not even considered that in order to get a patent granted you have to disclose your invention to the public which stops big corporations hoarding too many trade secrets.

          All in all, the idea that patents shouldn’t exist benefits nobody except the large corporations. Say goodbye to start ups growing in size if that is the case.

        • brianorca
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          Just because big tech does these things doesn’t mean we should remove any pretense of rules against it. If they want something a little guy has, they should buy it, not take it for free.

  • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
    link
    English
    341 year ago

    When I look at the inability to fund big science projects like this, I’m reminded of the most fictional thing to ever happen in a science fiction movie.

    The film? Contact.

    They build a giant portal machine thing.

    Gets blowed up by terrorists.

    But that’s okay, because they’ve got another one!

    What?

    Yep!

    “Why build one when you can build two for twice the price?”

    FALSE. SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF FAILURE. ABORT.

    • Zorque
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Wasn’t the second one built by an eccentric billionaire or something? Like a Howard Hughes type.

      • @jacksilver
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        It was actually the us government that built a second one in secret, which actually sounds about right.

        • directive0
          link
          English
          111 year ago

          Close. The US controlled it but it was built by Japanese subcontractors who just happen to be…

          …recently acquired… …wholly-owned subsidiaries… …of Hadden Industries.

          Want to take a ride?

          *I love that film despite all its flaws.

    • Cyrus Draegur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah everything’s been kinda fucked ever since, hasn’t it… i mean… it was 2008 right before obama being elected and i really don’t think the “correct” path of the future would have involved r-money or mccain winning so at least SOME shit would be the same, but still…

      • @Supervisor194
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        LHC didn’t start seriously smashing shit (beyond previous energies done by other colliders) until after 2010 though. I think everything went tits up about 2012, tbh - the year they found the Higgs Boson. I kind-of jokingly subscribe to the idea that the world ended. I mean, it just checks so many boxes to me, it truly seems that the universe as it stands right now is fundamentally different than it should be after the passing of one single decade.

        • Cyrus Draegur
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          okay i can DEFINITELY agree with you about 2012, shit’s been super fucking weird since SPECIFICALLY that year.

          the worst day of my life was December 22nd 2012 and I remember it very clearly because I couldn’t figure out WHY.

          I just felt awful to a degree i have NEVER felt before or ever again since. Not even once. Not even a little.

          It was a distinct watershed moment that divided my entire life into “before” and “after”.
          I figured it was just some freak hormonal imbalance that walloped me out of nowhere but it’s weird that that was the only time and that it coincided with such a distinct … difference in how the world was between ‘before that’ and ‘after that’.

          now, the higgs boson event was on a different date, certainly, but that day… i will never be able to forget it.

        • @Gabu
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          We accidentally changed the fabric of the Universe by observing it.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    English
    181 year ago

    Maybe they should do a Kickstarter.