• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This isn’t kilometers, area, volume, distant measurement. It’s temperature. What that 100 is based on is random as fuck, and having the temperature of one elements boiling point at sea level divisible by 10 doesn’t really help anything. There is a 100 degree point in Farenhenheit too, you could simply use that for…well whatever reason you need ten to go in evenly.

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      21 year ago

      My guy, I’m not arguing whether the boiling temperature of water is a random point (because it isn’t random in any way, and I’m not interested in arguing that). I’m arguing one simple thing: assigning something on a scale to 100 is much less random than assigning it to 212.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think you have a very clear grasp on what random means, and 212 wasn’t assigned.

        • @FooBarrington
          link
          21 year ago

          You have no understanding of randomness if you think that 100 is equally random as 212 in our decimal system. No, not every number is equally random, no matter how often you repeat it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I understand you have a fetish for numbers that are multiples of ten, but that doesn’t make them special. Picking a number out of a hat is as likely to be a 9 as a 100.

            • @FooBarrington
              link
              11 year ago

              Acknowledging that powers of a number systems base are special in that system isn’t something I ever thought people would disagree with.

              Why do you think we have concepts like “percentages”?

                • @FooBarrington
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  You’re so close to getting it - why is it not a fraction of 10, but a fraction of 100?