• @FooBarrington
    link
    21 year ago

    My guy, I’m not arguing whether the boiling temperature of water is a random point (because it isn’t random in any way, and I’m not interested in arguing that). I’m arguing one simple thing: assigning something on a scale to 100 is much less random than assigning it to 212.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think you have a very clear grasp on what random means, and 212 wasn’t assigned.

      • @FooBarrington
        link
        21 year ago

        You have no understanding of randomness if you think that 100 is equally random as 212 in our decimal system. No, not every number is equally random, no matter how often you repeat it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I understand you have a fetish for numbers that are multiples of ten, but that doesn’t make them special. Picking a number out of a hat is as likely to be a 9 as a 100.

          • @FooBarrington
            link
            11 year ago

            Acknowledging that powers of a number systems base are special in that system isn’t something I ever thought people would disagree with.

            Why do you think we have concepts like “percentages”?

              • @FooBarrington
                link
                11 year ago

                You’re so close to getting it - why is it not a fraction of 10, but a fraction of 100?

                  • @FooBarrington
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    So we use fractions of 100 instead of fractions of 10 because base 60 was too useful? How does that make any sense? The question wasn’t why we use base 100 instead of base 60.