• @Dagnet
    link
    English
    691 year ago

    what I noticed is that posts have huge amounts of upvotes, even from small communities, and often no comments or when it does have comments its often very basic stuff, almost AI like

        • The Picard Maneuver
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 year ago

          Yeah, looks like the default “word_wordnumbers” usernames that reddit gives you if don’t change them.

          I wonder if that would be an easy way to detect botting by not filling in that field for them.

          • HarkMahlberg
            link
            fedilink
            211 year ago

            Yeah, looks like the default “word_wordnumbers” usernames that reddit gives you if don’t change them.

            This change is when I knew Reddit was going down the shitter. Automatically handing out default usernames instead of requiring you to pick your own. The only people that could possibly help are a) people with absolutely no imagination whatsoever, b) bots, and c) people making a dozen alts to puff up their main.

          • Cosmic Cleric
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, looks like the default “word_wordnumbers” usernames that reddit gives you if don’t change them.

            Funny enough, this started happening on YouTube (comments) as well, around the same time.

            The issue with sites starting to use numbering as part of the default username only started happening after AI posting became a thing, because an Achilles heel is the fact that AI can’t come up with enough believable unique names for all the posts they want their AI bots to make.

            • @numberfour002
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              an Achilles heel is the fact that AI can’t come up with enough believable unique names for all the posts you want your AI bots to make

              That seems counterintuitive to me in the context of modern AI approaches. I’m wondering if you could elaborate on that a bit more.

              • Cosmic Cleric
                link
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That seems counterintuitive to me in the context of modern AI approaches.

                How so? Elaborate?

                I’m wondering if you could elaborate on that a bit more.

                This seems sufficiently explanatory to me, especially the italicized part…

                AI can’t come up with enough believable unique names for all the posts they want their AI bots to make

                Unbelievable usernames becomes an easy identifier/tag for identifying bot post.

                Edit: since this comment got downvoted (as the assumed reply) I thought I would elaborate a bit more.

                Basically, we name our user accounts to fit the society we live in’s norms, it’s naming conventions.

                If you just run a bunch of vowels and consonants together, that does not make a username, at least not one that people will recognize as a valid one created by a human being.

                Part of how bots are effective is in the quantity of bots that are used. Since it’s near zero cost to spin up a new bot to make posts/comments, many can be made.

                However people can track the validity of a user name as being a bot versus human by the quantity of the posts/comments the username makes (only so many hours in a day, and human beings are busy with other things besides just posting on Lemmy), so no one single bot can make too many posts/comments at one time.

                Because of this, you need a large quantity of unique names, one for each of your bots, and they have to be believable ones by humans, so they’re not identified as bots.

      • ThisLucidLens
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        I can’t believe 8 people had the exact same idea for a post at the same time, that’s crazy

        /s

    • @EatYouWell
      link
      English
      441 year ago

      Well, if you’re going to defraud investors by pumping up your numbers before your IPO, you might as well go all out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I think it was there for a while, it’s just gone full mask off mode and become particularly noticeable now

      • @Dagnet
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        like 2 months ago

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      You know what else is random and probably related to their paid content? Their sorting doesn’t work right anymore. Posts in “hot” are regularly like more than a day old but then also some are brand new like minutes old. But if you sort by top 24 hours…same posts. Sometimes the order is different but easily 75% of the posts are the same. A 24 hour old post with no new comments is “hot”? A one hour old post with 20 comments is in the top posts of the past day?..OKAY

      • @numberfour002
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        It could be incompetence. Lemmy.world has similar and significant issues with sorting as well and I presume you’re not also implying that paid content has anything to do with lemmy sorting.