• Mozilla ends partnership with Onerep due to CEO’s ties to data broker
  • Onerep’s data removal service bundled into Mozilla’s Monitor Plus subscription
  • Onerep CEO admits to owning people-search websites, leading to end of partnership with Mozilla. Transition plan in progress.
  • @rockSlayer
    link
    English
    952 months ago

    People over profit generally seems to be the best business practice anyways

    • @FordBeeblebrox
      link
      English
      942 months ago

      I had a car with a bad alternator and took it to a shop, manager quoted me $150 then called an hour later to say he’d picked the wrong version of my car on the computer, mine would be $100 more but he said “a deals a deal so we’ll do it for the 150.”

      Every other car problem I had after, straight to that shop cause I knew they’d do solid work and charge me fairly. Putting people before profits means retaining workers and getting loyal customers

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        English
        272 months ago

        It definitely makes sense to anyone with the ability to see past their nose. I wish companies like Comcast and Verizon could see it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          242 months ago

          Monopolies for modern necessities (the internet and phone) don’t have to worry about customer retention.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            English
            22 months ago

            I mean, in some situations those two I mentioned are but I’ve been in the position to easily switch service to another company and that doesn’t change their behavior at all.

            • @kambusha
              link
              English
              52 months ago

              “So the problem is it’s too easy to switch. Let’s change that!” - some CEO, probably

              • @FordBeeblebrox
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Some CEO to another, at a ski chalet where they totally don’t collude at the spa.

              • @TrickDacy
                link
                English
                12 months ago

                They 100% have been having that conversation since the 50s if not earlier

      • @Plopp
        link
        English
        122 months ago

        Plot twist: The right version was actually cheaper, but they figured they’d tell you that story to make you a more loyal customer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Probably, but they might “just find out they don’t have the part in stock and can’t do it”" and refund

    • @Squizzy
      link
      English
      172 months ago

      How did you get to this conclusion? Tesla, amazon, McDs etc are top tier companies who are notoriously shit both to work for and in how they operate in terms of skirting regulation etc.

      • recursive_recursion [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        investing in people(customers) brings slow but longterm sustainable profits (Linux for example)

        profits don’t bring customers, they bring investors

        • @Squizzy
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          Profits are the goal though, look at the car industry, they have reduced production numbers to increase profits with higher margins.

          They dont care about customers, only profits and investors.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            The point is that if they get complacent, they get replaced (example: what tesla and new Chinese companies like BYD are doing with the car market)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              That doesn’t change the fact that you’re both not taking the real issue into account; the biggest, wealthiest shareholders are demanding a sustained 25% RoI. That is inherently unsustainable and by design. They want companies to die because monopolies are profitable and the market was booming (until they decided to milk everything dry) so there is money to be made IF you don’t value human civilization.

              I fucking hate the rich.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          English
          02 months ago

          …you’re holding up Linux as a successful business entity? Compared to Tesla, Amazon, and McDonald’s?

          You need some new hobbies bro