• Franklin
    link
    305 months ago

    Yeah but also it’s a bullshit requirement. Should be removed imo.

    • @SchmidtGenetics
      link
      -20
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s a crossplay mandatory game, if you’re a dick, PSN wants a way to block you. No different than getting VAC banned.

      This isn’t steam servers, it’s Sony servers. What do you want?

      • Franklin
        link
        12
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It doesn’t need it for crossplay.

      • @Wilzax
        link
        105 months ago

        Then VAC ban the steam account since you sold on steam. The game worked fine for months after launch without requiring a PlayStation account and would continue to work fine otherwise.

        The most major issue is that BECAUSE they didn’t enforce a tiny part of their terms of use that is a dealbreaker for most users, those users will now be unable to refund the game due to steam’s “2 hours playtime = no refund” rule

        • @SchmidtGenetics
          link
          -9
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The most major issue is that BECAUSE they didn’t enforce a tiny part of their terms of use that is a dealbreaker for most users, those users will now be unable to refund the game due to steam’s “2 hours playtime = no refund” rule

          It was required from the start, why are buying something without knowing if it will even run first? Its hilarious the amount of people defending something that’s people’s own stupidity.

          Quite the sad reflection of reality unfortunately.

          • @Wilzax
            link
            85 months ago

            Because if it doesn’t run, you won’t get 2 hours of playtime and steam will refund it. Stop defending corporate greed on a social media platform DESIGNED to get away from corporate greed.

            • @SchmidtGenetics
              link
              -105 months ago

              Abusing a system because you can’t be arsed to read something is an interesting take.

              It’s interesting that providing information is always defending some corporation when it doesn’t align with your narrative……

              • Saik0
                link
                fedilink
                English
                55 months ago

                So let me make a game that will work for exactly 3 hours and break. It’s the same concept here. They made the game. It worked for months. Now magically it won’t.

                • @SchmidtGenetics
                  link
                  -7
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  How’s it the same? They told everyone you needed psn, it was a restriction when the game came out, it lead to issues, they paused it and are now implementing it again.

                  A better example would be WoW making the game free for 3 months due to a card charging issue and people getting mad when they say they need to charge again.

                  It never worked as designed from the start it was broken, so they paused a requirement that was always there, and are now reimplementing it. The other option was to delist the game, but that would make the same people mad for a different issue, it’s a lose/lose situation for everyone.

                  Anyone who couldn’t read the steam page, or the giant splash screen when you launched the game, only have themselves to blame. This is literally brought on by people’s own stupidity, but defend that stupidity, please, let everyone else know you defend stupidity.

                  But sure make a game that works for 3 hours, totally the same thing lmfao.

                  • Saik0
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    35 months ago

                    How’s it the same? They told everyone you needed psn, it was a restriction when the game came out, it lead to issues, they paused it and are now implementing it again.

                    They didn’t tell me shit. I bought the game. I got to that part. It let me skip it without anything saying that it would become a requirement at a later point. What about that is being told? This is literally the first time I’ve heard about this being a hard requirement. This also proves that it’s not actually a hard requirement. They can choose to do it.

                    But defend big corporations for unenforceable EULAs. Let everyone else know you defend Big Sony.

          • @Bytemeister
            link
            Ελληνικά
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Hi,

            I don’t have a PSN account. I was able to log in and play without using a PSN account. At no point was I told that a PSN account would be required to play. My very reasonable assumption. Is that the PSN account requirement was listed for crossplay, or managing socials with PS players. If the game had not worked from day one, or if I had been notified in the game that this was merely a temporary solution, and that I would be unable to play at all in the coming months, then I would have refunded without even trying.

            So no, despite what the little label said, PSN account was not required to play the game. It worked fine without the PSN account.

            In an ideal world, the requirement would be removed. Since the availability of the game has arbitrarily changed a lot in the last 2 days, Sony should at least offer full refunds and an apology to the community.

            • @SchmidtGenetics
              link
              -1
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Hi

              There was literally a splash screen you accepted when you loaded up the game the first time.

              You have no excuse, bye.

              • @Bytemeister
                link
                Ελληνικά
                05 months ago

                I don’t need to make an excuse. You’re making excuses, even more pathetic, you’re making excuses for a megacorp trying to datamine their customers by changing the conditions for use of the game that they already bought.

                Toodles.

                • @SchmidtGenetics
                  link
                  -15 months ago

                  changing the conditions

                  We just established this was required before launch, why are you lying?

                  Give your head a shake lmfao.

                  • @Bytemeister
                    link
                    Ελληνικά
                    0
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    I played the game without a PSN account, along with most of the HD2 community, and I was happy with the content, which in no way relied on having a PSN account. I don’t have one. I played the game. Therefore, it was not required, regardless of what the store blurb said. I got exactly one notice to link a PSN account, which I skipped, it was a skippable thing, meaning was not required. When I skipped the PSN account, it took me straight to the game. There was no notice that it would be required to link at a later date.

                    If no one has told you yet, you have an amazing tongue. Your capability to lick boots and kiss ass is unparalleled. Shame that Sony won’t notice your efforts here either.