When Bloomberg reported that Spotify would be upping the cost of its premium subscription from $9.99 to $10.99, and including 15 hours of audiobooks per month in the U.S., the change sounded like a win for songwriters and publishers. Higher subscription prices typically equate to a bump in U.S. mechanical royalties — but not this time.

By adding audiobooks into Spotify’s premium tier, the streaming service now claims it qualifies to pay a discounted “bundle” rate to songwriters for premium streams, given Spotify now has to pay licensing for both books and music from the same price tag — which will only be a dollar higher than when music was the only premium offering. Additionally, Spotify will reclassify its duo and family subscription plans as bundles as well.

  • @TheFeatureCreature
    link
    English
    1038 months ago

    Please, people, for the love of the gods, stop using Spotify. There are numerous other services that are so much better value for your money and don’t treat artists (as much) like trash.

    And that being said, try to support your beloved artists directly as much as you can. Buying digital downloads or physical media will give them more money than a lifetime of streaming ever would. Plus you get to keep the higher-quality music even if the platform or artist goes tits-up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      678 months ago

      Could you give me some examples of alternative services? I’m paying spotify right now, but i’ll love to ditch it.

      • @TheFeatureCreature
        link
        English
        648 months ago

        Sure, although keep in mind this will vary by region due to licensing issues.

        Deezer is probably Spotify’s best direct competitor. They are priced equally (depending on region) and now offer high-res streaming as default instead of a paid extra. They’ve been expanding with new features such as lyrics, collab playlists, song identification, and they recently improved their recommendation system. They also offer a discount if you buy subs yearly instead of monthly so you can save if you like the platform.

        Apple Music is also an option now that Apple has put in some work to make the platform easier to use on non-Apple devices such as the recently added Windows app. It’s not as feature-rich as Deezer but if you don’t use those added features anyway then it is an option. I personally would phrase it as “has less bloat”. If you own any Apple devices already then it will have tighter integration with them.

        Tidal is the old favourite of audiophiles and music appreciators. They have been expanding their platform with new features and music and, somewhat recently, have also lowered their prices. High-res streaming is now included in the base sub tier. All of these alternatives pay artists more than Spotify but Tidal has one of the best artist payouts.

        Qobuz is similar to Tidal and is a premium platform with a focus on quality. They are a newer service and are still expanding their regions, so I don’t have personal experience with them as they only recently opened up to my country. Their price and feature set looks competitive, though, and their UI does look slick. They also have better artist payouts.

        Amazon Music apparently has better payouts for artists but Amazon is a shit company so I’ve never looked into them further. I’ll include YouTube Music here as well which has shitty payouts and is a shitty company.

        • @fpslemOP
          link
          English
          49
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Amazon Music

          I invested heavily in the Amazon Music ecosystem, I bought hundreds of albums on there, and the platform is now very nearly unusuable. I cannot even listen to the songs that I paid for without also having to listen to ads. And the Android app now hides the downloads in some hidden folder so I can’t even download them and listen to them on another player. It makes me furious.

          I’ve actually gone back to CDs, if you can believe it. It’s kind of nice sometimes, especially for full album plays, but I do miss a nice big playlist of my favorite songs from all artists.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
            link
            English
            108 months ago

            I can believe it. I still have multiple libraries of physical media, and I pretty much never buy anything new that I can’t likewise physically own. I might rip and make MP3’s or transcode or emulate, or whatever, for convenience, but sometimes it’s just nice to be able to stick the disk or cartridge in the machine and have it just work without any of the associated modern ancillary bullshit.

            Everything wants to be a service now. I just find that so irritating.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          118 months ago

          Apple Music also has Dolby atmos and much higher quality audio files compared to Spotify.

          The only thing Spotify has on everyone is excellent playlists. I just use SongShift to copy the playlists over.

          Tidal is okay but I prefer Apple Music since it has a better UI, cheaper price and is more user friendly for my non-audiophile family members.

          • zelifcam
            link
            English
            78 months ago

            if you use Apple Music and have a desktop/laptop look into Cider 2. Incredible streaming music player. https://cider.sh/

        • redfellow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          None of these have good app support compared to Spotify, sadly. Not supported by my car, nor my Linux desktop, or home speakers.

          Oh and Deezer pays even less to artists than Spotify.

          • @thesystemisdown
            link
            English
            48 months ago

            Oh and Deezer pays even less to artists than Spotify.

            I don’t think that’s accurate. Care to provide your source?

        • @ApollosArrow
          link
          English
          48 months ago

          The interesting thing about Tidal is that is was originally owned by artists (Jay-Z, Beyoncé; Kanye West; Madonna; Jason Aldean; Alicia Keys; Arcade Fire; Coldplay’s Chris Martin; Rihanna; and deadmau5) Who have since sold off a majority share to Block, while Jay-Z kept a board seat and other artists still have shares. Curious if it will last.

        • Fushuan [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          Tidal is the only one for me since it’s the only one with an unofficial HiFi Linux client, which is a wrapper around the web version but with HiFi enabled.

          I’m happy reading that they are decent on pay for artists.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          What’s the USP of Deezer over Apple Music now that the latter has lossless streaming as well (and live lyrics for longer)?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Thanks for the recommendation, I was worried they would be missing some of my artists but they had 99% of my music. Can’t wait to ditch Spotify.

          ETA: dear lord the sound quality is so much better. I had no idea what I was missing.

          • Logi
            link
            English
            78 months ago

            Yeah, happily using Tidal as well. Haven’t missed any music that wasn’t also missing from Spotify, so…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            Yeh, it’s pretty amazing.
            Only thing I miss from Spotify are the user generated playlists, where I can search for something like “liquid drum and bass” and get a bunch of playlists

        • @rtxn
          link
          English
          98 months ago

          Does Tidal have a lightweight Linux client that’s kept up-to-date?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            88 months ago

            Tidal on Linux is a crap shoot, which sucks because pipewire is awesome for HiRes music since it can change sample rate on the fly to match a source. Best bet is Firefox and their web player, and using the middle tier “high” that’s blue colored, and letting pipewire play @ 44100

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            Unfortunately, I’ve only found a wrapped up web client thing. Using the web page is probably similar.

            The wrapped up web client works better than the native client on windows, tho. Not sure on sound quality, I haven’t had an issue tho

            • Fushuan [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              If you are talking about Tidal HiFi, the UI might be similar to the web version but apparently itbruns on a modified version of chrome that allows HiFi music? I did test it some months ago and the quality difference is noticeable.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                Yeh, the electron wrapped Tidal HiFi for Linux. I just checked the GitHub, and it says it supports High and Max settings thanks to Widevine.
                I swapped from Spotify to Tidal on windows and was blown away. Shortly after I started daily-driving Linux. I haven’t done an A/B between the Linux electron version and the windows desktop version, but it hasn’t annoyed me like Spotify did.

                • Fushuan [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  38 months ago

                  According to another commenter chromium on Linux is hard capped on quality, so although it’s noticeable vs the web version, it’s not actual Max quality. I haven’t noticed it although my headphones should be able to show the difference (sony MDR 7506, I know, yes, for everything, people say that it doesn’t sound nice, I don’t care I love it) so idk.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    28 months ago

                    Yeh, that’s where I’m at with it.
                    I’ve seen comments that chromium does 48khz, and the high quality is 44.1khz, so there’s is sample rate conversion happening yada yada yada.
                    I’m not going to let perfection stand in the way of good.

                    Hopefully Tidal releases a native Linux client. That would be ideal.
                    Either way, it’s better than Spotify. I’m not bombarded by podcasts, I’m not funding podcasts I wouldn’t touch with a 10ft pole, and Tidal pays artists more than both Apple and Spotify.
                    It ticks enough boxes for me, and I’m super happy with Tidal

          • Fushuan [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Idk what the other two are saying because Tidal HiFi is an unofficial client that let’s you reproduce high quality music, being basically the only one that let’s you do it on Linux. Yeah it’s a web wrapper but with HiFi enabled or whatever, I don’t really remember but the default web version doesn’t have HiFi and the app does and it’s noticeable.

            https://github.com/Mastermindzh/tidal-hifi?tab=readme-ov-file#features

      • gila
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        As an Apple hater; Apple Music. Cheaper, good cross-platform frontends, more equitable to artists (though by no means satisfactorily so), has a Wrapped equivalent (though who actually cares). Maybe Spotify added something it doesn’t have in the several years since I switched but, I doubt it

      • @khannie
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        Napster pay decent artist royalties and offer a Spotify migration service for your playlists etc. as well as lossless music.

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod
      link
      English
      258 months ago

      It’s too convenient. Most people just want easy access and don’t even think of the downstream impacts. If a song or two goes unavailable, probably won’t notice. There is gonna need to be an alternative that is cheap and feature rich along with Spotify missing some steps. It’s here for awhile.

      • @TheFeatureCreature
        link
        English
        158 months ago

        You are not wrong, but there are other services that are just as convenient and for less money. Spotify knows they are the “default” music streaming platform and they are exploiting that.

        • Granbo's Holy Hotrod
          link
          English
          58 months ago

          A quick Google puts the top two at Apple and Amazon. So that is a big no for me boss. I am pretty sure the next ones listed are just torrent front ends. I have a life now so no time for that…spotify it is.

          • andyburke
            link
            fedilink
            58 months ago

            I use Tidal. It may not be much better than Spotify, but it’s better than Spotify.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              78 months ago

              Audio quality is better and they pay the artists the most of all the major streaing platforms. I’ve been using Tidal for 2 years and have been very happy with the switch

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      128 months ago

      While it doesn’t have well known artists, indie streaming Resonate prides itself as having the most generous (or at least, close to) payments to artists. To support this, it has an innovative payment model akin to higher purchase. You pay a little for the first listen to a track, but the price increases through subsequent listens. After 9 listens, you own the track outright. The total cost of ownership is around $0.9

      • classic
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        That’s a cool model, at least at first glance

    • red_rising
      link
      English
      108 months ago

      What is a better alternative, aside from just buying the media directly?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Well better than Spotify is a real low bar. I’m on an apple music family plan and I like it but if I weren’t I’d probably get tidal. And they actually dropped the price of their high quality tier.

        • applepie
          link
          fedilink
          58 months ago

          And they actually dropped the price of their high quality tier.

          This is what we call competition, kids… i know most people don’t understand the concept but it is supposed to make consumer make a change by providing a good deal.

          This is the opposite we see nowadays, where they fuck you and say it is fine because “reasons”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Here’s a link with more info

            Tidal will no longer keep its high-res, lossless and spatial audio content locked behind a £20/$20-per-month “HiFi Plus” subscription. Instead, it is now moved into a single individual user plan, costing a lower-cost, Spotify-matching £11/$11 per month.

            Previously, users paid that price for CD-quality FLAC files, but needed to opt for the pricier plan to unlock 24-bit/192kHz tracks and Dolby Atmos content.

            That’s now all changed as of 10th April, which saw the new £11/$11 per month plan implemented.

            And specifically to your point

            This price drop only puts further pressure on Spotify to improve the quality of its catalogue, which is currently capped at 320kbps in its Premium tier, and has no native support for spatial audio tracks.

            That alone should be enough to get people considering other options. I’m sure there’s more beyond the big three too.

        • @slaacaa
          link
          English
          38 months ago

          I got a few months of Apple Music with some device, was happy to ditch Spotify. Not very good, preferred Spotify’s UI and logic, but still a better alternative, and at least not pushing podcasts in my face (which I have zero interest in). I will never use Spotify again

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            That’s another big one to me too. I opened Spotify recently and you can plainly see the music is no longer the focus.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          I used Tidal for a year but went back to Apple Music. I don’t understand what people like about Tidal that Apple Music doesn’t offer.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              58 months ago

              It’s really 3 peanuts instead of 4. Streaming just doesn’t provide a lot of money for artists.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                28 months ago

                That’s true. I still use Bandcamp. But as someone who listens to a lot of rap when I’m on a track and “view artist” I appreciate Tidal allowing me to choose which artist. Apple music defaults to the firs listed artist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      One of these services needs to release a feature like Spotify Connect, can’t switch without a replacement for that.

      • zelifcam
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Spotify Connect

        Unless I’m reading this wrong, is this just Spotify’s solution for listening with friends? If so, that’s far from a Spotify exclusive feature.

        Edit: Okay. So it’s their version of Airplay. It’s too bad Apple never opened it up. Streaming to remote devices has works for almost 20 years now in the Apple ecosystem.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Pretty much, I use one computer to remote control the music on my computer that is hooked up to my headphones or speakers.

          Nobody else supports that functionality last I checked.