• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        Español
        229 months ago

        I got the same thing on my phone’s calculator. Do you think the waterproofing will get in the way when I give it the baptism it clearly needs?

    • @themusicman
      link
      349 months ago

      That’s so ugly, it can’t be correct… 4 is much nicer

    • @RisingSwell
      link
      English
      229 months ago

      Glad you did though, only opened the comments to see what the actual answer was.

    • Mighty Weaksauce
      link
      219 months ago

      Ya beat me by seconds. Lemmy is truly blooming lol

    • @PR3CiSiON
      link
      189 months ago

      I got 178,910,723.30891

      My answer is superior.

      • @Blue_Morpho
        link
        129 months ago

        There’s a 4 in the more accurate answer. That is proof of the divine showing the truth before man could understand the full answer.

        • @Bayz0r
          link
          69 months ago

          This guy apologetics.

          • cheesepotatoes
            link
            4
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            2 is a couple.

            What’s a few, several, a bunch, a bit, many, a bundle?

          • @n0m4n
            link
            29 months ago

            2 is a couple, nine is that pron crew.

    • @iopq
      link
      79 months ago

      Do we really want to live in a world where this fraction is the answer? I would like my kids to grow up knowing it’s an integer

      • @bitwaba
        link
        29 months ago

        No thank you! Integer is too close to the devil’s word: integration!

    • @Stupidmanager
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      Round down for simplicity. Yes, yes, I can see 4 being the easy answer.

    • @harmsy
      link
      49 months ago

      I saw three different serious-looking answers, so I punched it into a spreadsheet to get my own answer. What I got matches your answer, but with an extra 2 at the end.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That is too complicated for me to understand, therefore, it is too complicated for everyone to understand. Why would anyone believe something that I can’t understand?

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      29 months ago

      That is just a theory. You should present both sides. Also a majority of religious scholars say it is 4.

    • 1024_Kibibytes
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Heathen! At that scale the digits after the decimal point aren’t significant. I’m sure you know that in your heart. Why can’t you accept an obvious universal truth?

    • @Blue_Morpho
      link
      99 months ago

      You aren’t supposed to read it literally. 4 is metaphorical.

    • @CleoTheWizard
      link
      49 months ago

      Well God is a trinity and is therefore also divisible by 3, checkmate atheists!

  • @elrik
    link
    English
    429 months ago

    The product ends in a 5 so it is odd and cannot be divisible by 4.

    • @Stupidmanager
      link
      English
      69 months ago

      Those damn people worshipping their rabbit god when we know for a fact the duck god is the true god! Now they refuse to believe the answer is 4.

      This means war!

  • @Lime66
    link
    249 months ago

    179288872.22473

      • Flying Squid
        link
        189 months ago

        That other number is long and complicated and scary. I looked into my heart and found that 4 was the answer that spoke to me the loudest.

      • @whotookkarl
        link
        26 months ago

        Well there’s a 4 in it so it’s basically a 100% true prediction, buy my book to see the next one

    • @n0m4n
      link
      7
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This checks. I estimated it to under 1/5 billion.

      To the OP, some periods or commas would have been nice.

      To the 4ists, Yeah. Well, ya know, that’s just, like, your opinion man.

      • @Lime66
        link
        29 months ago

        Yeah I know, I had copied it from a calculator but thought it had copied the commas

        • @n0m4n
          link
          19 months ago

          I was just jesting. No commas, (or periods for overseas friends), made the cartoon harder, which made the post funnier.

          Good post!

  • GladiusB
    link
    169 months ago

    I would have said “42” and walked away

    • fknM
      link
      0
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      On a cosmological scale the real answer and 4 are effectively the same number.

      Edit: not sure I understand the down votes…

  • @Persen
    link
    49 months ago

    At least calculator provides answers.