While the vast majority of the EU’s population has become steadily poorer recently, its top five richest billionaires have increased their wealth from €244bn in 2020 to €429bn in 2023, an Oxfam report revealed on Monday (15 January).

This represents a 76 percent increase in just three years — at a rate of €5.7m per hour.

“This inequality is no accident; the billionaire class is ensuring that corporations deliver more wealth to them at the expense of everyone else,” said Amitabh Behar, Oxfam International’s interim executive director.

  • Riddick3001OP
    link
    English
    50
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    We really should tax %% them all: their businesses, the Royal houses; no exceptions, or offshore bla bla. Then we can redistribute their wealth/power more socially.

    EU corporate tax rules should only be a beginning.

    • DessertStorms
      link
      fedilink
      2310 months ago

      That would be a great idea, if they didn’t hold their respective countries’, and EU legislatures by the balls.
      Billionaires are never going to voluntarily or willingly give up their power.

      There is good reason we say “eat the rich” instead of “tax the rich”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -7
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s an Anarcho-Capitalist-Primitivist thing: Switch to a deindustrialised setting so that we save the planet and continue with capitalism as completely deindustrialised that’s the only way to have a sustainable and sufficient (for the current population) source of food, to wit, the rich.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It’s an Anarcho-Capitalist-Primitivist

            How is eating the rich a capitalist thing?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              How can you use the rich as a sustainable source of nutrition without supporting capitalism? That’s how they grow!

      • Riddick3001OP
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        There is good reason we say “eat the rich” instead of “tax the rich”.

        Billionaires are never going to voluntarily or willingly give up their power.

        They won’t. But we can change regulations.

        Don’t know who " we" is nor the slogan tbh. Seems that according to wiki it’s a US slogan?

        Edit: probably because of The satirical book by Patrick Jake O’Rourke

        Contrary to US, this is Europe, and we ( should) have socialist foundations; unfortunately since a decade or so, it’s become more and more " capitalistic and right winged" in a bad way. We need to stop that trend.

        • DessertStorms
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’m not American, and eat the rich isn’t either https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eat_the_rich#Origin

          As for regulations, if I wasn’t clear before - those who make the regulations are either obscenely rich themselves and/or are funded and controlled by the obscenely rich. Changing regulations isn’t going to happen unless the obscenely rich approve, and they never will.

          As for the suggestion that Europe has socialist foundations - Europeans (previously all feudal) literally created capitalism and enslaved half of humanity to feed it. The countries they pillaged now designated “developing” and still exploited for cheap labour and resources. (edit to add: even Scandinavia, with its socialist veneer is neoliberal at best and heading exactly in the same direction the rest of us are, if a few years behind us) (edit to add more: and while the Soviet Block might have been told they had communism or even just socialism, that wasn’t actually the case, just more imperialism and some state capitalism as a treat)

          The idea that it’s only been a decade of decline to the right is so ignorant I can’t do anything other than laugh at the suggestion. Honestly - where to even start??? Maybe with fascism also being a European creation?

          You could seriously benefit not only from actually educating yourself on the history of where you’re from, and of the systems you live by, as well the current history as well, since you’re clearly completely clueless, but also from reducing your confidence in your ignorance. It’s not a good look.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            literally created capitalism and enslaved half of humanity to feed it.

            That’s one side of the equation. On the other there’s the EU officially being a social market economy and USians would get an aneuryism reading some parts of the German constitution. Like “Property entails obligations. Its use shall also serve the public good.”. Or that, going way beyond eminent domain, means of productions can be socialised without even having to prove social good. Expropriate big landlords? Berlin is currently in the process of doing exactly that.

            And that while no doubt Europe is causing a lot of problems elsewhere by its sheer economic weight alone, there’s also stuff like the upcoming Supply Chain Act, making anyone importing anything into Europe responsible for checking that human rights were observed. There is no fucking way in hell such a thing would even be considered by the Yanks.

          • Riddick3001OP
            link
            English
            010 months ago

            You could seriously benefit not only from actually educating yourself on the history of where you’re from, and of the systems you live by, as well the current history as well, since you’re clearly completely clueless, but also from reducing your confidence in your ignorance. It’s not a good look.

            Tnx for the explanation, I did read most of Rousseau’s work, doesn’t mean I remember everything I read.

            And just because I dont know this slogan, and you feel like I don’t agree with you, there is absolutely no need to be condescending. Not very social are we now?

            Also, you like to pinpoint only the worse elements of Europe, and you won’t acknowledge Europe’s socialist inheritance like here:

            "The first modern socialists were early 19th-century Western European social critics. In this period socialism emerged from a diverse array of doctrines and social experiments associated primarily with British and French thinkers—especially Thomas Spence, Charles Fourier, Saint-Simon, Robert Owen. " .

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1810 months ago

    Just tax anything above, say, 500million with a rate of 95%. Nobody needs that kind of money. Making that much is only numbers porn for the sociopaths, it doesn’t matter if they get to keep it.

  • @snekerpimp
    link
    English
    1310 months ago

    Do we grill them or pan seer them?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    510 months ago

    Eat the rich. It’s the best thing you can do: for society, against climate change, everything.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    510 months ago

    i was worried that they would not be able to sustain their life through the recent inflations 👏😭 close one, good on them

  • @quams69
    link
    English
    210 months ago

    Guillotines. Run em through until people understand: hoard wealth, lose your head