• @MaxPow3r11
    link
    English
    548 months ago

    He should build a sub to go to the bottom of the ocean.

      • lurch (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        138 months ago

        they’ll never do that, but maybe a spaceship shaped like a giant penis could do the trick

        • @ArtVandelay
          link
          English
          58 months ago

          Give it exactly 420.69 lb of rocket fuel and fire it into the sun

          • lurch (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            If they hesitate, we just tell them there are neither poor people, nor taxes in space 😜

    • chaogomu
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      And skimp on materials, build it out of carbon fiber instead of titanium or steel.

  • @RagingSnarkasm
    link
    English
    508 months ago

    Building a metaverse that people want to actually engage with was too hard, so he’s decided to scale back his ambitions and tackle something less difficult: AGI.

    • ffhein
      link
      English
      58 months ago

      He just want some virtual friends to hang out with in the metaverse, since humans weren’t interested.

  • @Buffalox
    link
    English
    15
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Is Zuckerberg an idiot? Or does he have an actual plan with this?
    Seems to me it’s completely useless like Metaverse.
    If the LLM is so stupid it can’t figure out the sides of an equal sign can be reversed as simple as in 2+2=4 <=> 4=2+2. He will never achieve general intelligence by just throwing more compute power at it.
    As powerful as LLM is, it’s still astoundingly stupid when it hits its limitations.

    • aname
      link
      fedilink
      English
      128 months ago

      Humans are astoundigly stupid when they hit their limitations.

      • @art101
        link
        English
        48 months ago

        Spoken like a true AI!!! ;-)

      • @Sylver
        link
        English
        08 months ago

        The difference is that we can go beyond that limitation. Even self-coding AI will either solve a problem, or compound its own inefficiencies before asking an operator to help out.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 months ago

          Your post sounds almost as dense as:

          “everything that can be invented has been invented.” - Duell 1899.

          • @Sylver
            link
            English
            38 months ago

            The difference here is that Zuck is not planning on inventing or revolutionizing anything. He’s just throwing more computation power at an already inefficient method of modeling AI.

        • aname
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          or compound its own inefficiencies before asking an operator to help out.

          Some people do. Some people refuse to ask for help.

    • @deafboy
      link
      English
      68 months ago

      I don’t know much, but from what I know, we still haven’t reach a point of diminishing returns, so more power = more better.

      • @kadu
        link
        English
        68 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Kogasa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          You can already ask ChatGPT to model a real life scenario with a simple math equation. There is at least a rough model of how basic math can be used to solve problems.

      • @fidodo
        link
        English
        28 months ago

        Not necessarily since you also need better techniques. A competitor could easily surpass you with less by being smarter about how the AI is trained.

    • @fidodo
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Trying to achieve AGI by throwing more compute at LLMs is like trying to reach the moon by building a more powerful hot air balloon.

      • @Buffalox
        link
        English
        28 months ago

        Assuming that “not compute” should be “more compute” I totally agree. That’s a very apt analogy.

        • @fidodo
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yes, thanks, swipe typing picked up “not” instead of “more”. Maybe someone can throw some more compute at the swipe typing algorithm to better pick up on the context of the sentence when picking words.

  • Boozilla
    link
    English
    98 months ago

    Zuckerberg: Why are my pupils vertical slits? Why am I always cold? Why do people find me so repellent?

    AI: Sir, I can answer all three with one response, but you won’t like it.

  • @iAvicenna
    link
    English
    88 months ago

    I wonder if he really thinks that AGI is just AI with more parameters and gpus thrown into the mix.

  • John Colagioia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88 months ago

    Sure, we could point to thousands of years of really smart people trying and utterly failing to build mathematical models for innovation and thought, but it also does make a certain amount of sense that, if you pile up enough transistors and wish really hard, that your investment will Frosty the Snowman itself into being your friend, right…?

  • @Dkarma
    link
    English
    58 months ago

    Iirc the h100s are $30k per gpu at this time.

    • @Squeak
      link
      English
      78 months ago

      I’m sure he’d get a hefty discount on 350k of them

    • @thallamabond
      link
      English
      68 months ago

      Retail price of $10,500,000,000. That’s nuts.

    • @tburkhol
      link
      English
      58 months ago

      Still less than Musk paid for Twitter. It’s totally reasonable from a biggest-billionaire-toy entry.