The blockbuster remark came moments before closing arguments in Trump’s second trial in a case brought by E. Jean Carroll

A federal judge threatened Donald Trump’s attorney Alina Habba with jail time on Friday, after the former president’s lawyer kept contesting a ruling after it had been issued.

“You are on the verge of spending some time in the lockup,” senior U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan warned. “Sit down.”

The bombshell remark came moments before the start of closing arguments in Trump’s second trial in a case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll.

  • FenrirIII
    link
    1015 months ago

    When will this woman be disbarred? We should start taking bets.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      815 months ago

      Why was she ever admitted to the bar in the first place when she doesn’t understand basic courtroom etiquette?

      • Tedrow
        link
        585 months ago

        She understands. She is trying to get attention and is desperate.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          135 months ago

          I honestly don’t think she does. Why would she risk being thrown in jail for that? She did multiple things that made the judge reprimand her.

          • @chonglibloodsport
            link
            445 months ago

            Rudy Giuliani was a prosecutor and deputy attorney general. He was also well known as “America’s Mayor” after rallying New Yorkers in the wake of 9/11. Yet that didn’t stop him from ruining his own life committing crimes to protect Trump.

            It’s really bizarre!

            • Flying Squid
              link
              235 months ago

              I agree, but Rudy has never said anything remotely like this-

              “Somebody said to me ‘Alina, would you rather be smart or pretty?’ and I said ‘Oh easy, pretty… I can fake being smart’.

              https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/alina-habba-trump-lawyer-court-b2481296.html

              And I don’t think that statement was part of some sort of complicated 4-D chess to protect trump. The easiest explanation is she’s stupid but pretty and willing to work for free. What more could Trump ask for?

              • @psycho_driver
                link
                75 months ago

                She’s not wrong. I have someone in my extended family who was a willowy 5’10 very attractive woman with no kids who couldn’t have out-mathed my at the time sixth grader (really, no hyperbole, I was present for real world examples of this happening) who is the CFO of a company in San Diego with a beach front condo.

                • @MotoAsh
                  link
                  85 months ago

                  Well, we both know she didn’t choose smart.

          • Neato
            link
            fedilink
            English
            155 months ago

            She knows the judge has on kid gloves for the trial so as not to give any reason for an appeals court to overturn. So she’s pushing her luck. Also makes get famous for “sticking it to the judge” in Republican circles.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            105 months ago

            Because it really isn’t a risk at this point. She’s been in contempt of court many times already.

        • @eran_morad
          link
          95 months ago

          Never underestimate the stupidity of a republican.

          • Tedrow
            link
            65 months ago

            Why not both?

      • DefiantBidet
        link
        English
        435 months ago

        Oh, I’m not certain she doesn’t understand. Performative art. She got used to performing in a way her main audience (mango mussolini et al) enjoyed in the no jury case, with state level Judge Engoran - that she thinks she can use the same tricks that make him smile on a federal judge.

        To me this is hubris, not ignorance. To be clear there is a fair bit of both, but thus is show work not trial work.

        Her inability to properly file evidence is her ignorance. Sass is for show imo.

      • @Jas91a
        link
        15 months ago

        Nah she’s just grandstanding for Trump he will like it

    • @Rapidcreek
      link
      25 months ago

      I don’t think they disbar lawyers because they terrible at lawyerng.

  • @Nunar
    link
    335 months ago

    She’s gunning to be his next wife.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If we’re going by presidential succession we actually don’t have a Fourth Lady because the President Pro Tempore of the Senate is a woman.

        (I know what you’re saying and it’s funny I just wanted to say this)

  • Granbo's Holy Hotrod
    link
    295 months ago

    I just read that she considers herself a very devout Christian. She has also been divorced and remarried less than a year later. What a garbage person.

    • @pandacoder
      link
      25 months ago

      That checks out. Exactly what I’d expect from a devout Christian.

  • @guacupado
    link
    275 months ago

    Threatened over and over but doesn’t actually do anything. Which is why they keep doing whatever they want.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -35 months ago

      Sending her to jail does nothing other than rile up his base and give him grounds to declare bias. I’m glad the judge has a better grasp on this than you do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        So we just let them continue breaking the law so as to appease fascists? Yeah that’s a terrible idea

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -15 months ago

          No, it’s the exact opposite. I don’t give a shit if she spends a couple of days in jail for being annoying in court. I want to make sure the rulings against trump, the rapist and insurrectionist, are unimpeachable.

          It’s overreacting to petty shit meant to antagonize that is going to let them get away with breaking the actual laws we all actually care about.

      • @Railing5132
        cake
        link
        35 months ago

        I get it, but there has to be a point where the rule of law isn’t held hostage by “riling up the base”. People get pissed that there’s two justice systems, one for the rich and another for everyone else - so because this rich asshat can throw cannon fodder idiot performative lawyers out to gin up the base, he gets kid gloves?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I get it, but there has to be a point where the rule of law isn’t held hostage by “riling up the base"

          100% agreed. That point is far beyond a lawyer being annoying in court, imo.

          so because this rich asshat can throw cannon fodder idiot performative lawyers out to gin up the base, he gets kid gloves?

          Ignoring this is so the punishment given to him is unimpeachable. If she puts his lawyer in jail, it’s easier on appeal to claim bias. It’s the whole point of the move, and it would be bad judgement by the judge to jail her…it’s like grabbing the little fish and thus letting the big one get away.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    185 months ago

    She’s good looking and now famous, nothing will happen to her other than a spot on television.

    • littleblue✨
      link
      -45 months ago

      Her makeup and outfits are well-applied, but most anyone with a shred of self-respect would chew their arm off if they woke up next to her naked Picasso after a bender.

      • @MadMonkey
        link
        -15 months ago

        I volu teer as tribute. (jokes I love my current SO vv much)

  • Political Incorruption
    link
    115 months ago

    I thought the legally blonde sequels were over. Why is this fall from grace trope playing out?

    • @moistclump
      link
      185 months ago

      Don’t insult the legally blonde franchise like that.

        • @GraniteM
          link
          65 months ago

          Or she could be the anti-Elle, who thinks that just because she’s pretty she can get away with being a terrible lawyer, and Elle needs to teach her that impeccable style and grooming may be important, but that being a lawyer is about a whole lot more than knowing which shoes go with which purse.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      125 months ago

      She’s not naturally blonde. That’s a bottle. Look at those roots.

  • @affiliate
    link
    105 months ago

    is it really a threat if there’s no chance it will actually happen?

    • @psycho_driver
      link
      155 months ago

      Oh his underlings can definitely take a fall. He’s left a wide swath of them in his wake. I’d be happy if they just disbarred her.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      115 months ago

      The wheels are turning on that, but the wheels turn slowly.

      But it’s not because of this. These are just shenanigans and Kaplan doesn’t have patience for shenanigans.

      Documents have come to light that she once implied to a former staff member of Trump’s golf course that she was representing her in a sexual harassment (what else?) settlement when she was really representing Trump. That’s a thing lawyers get disbarred for.

  • @LEDZeppelin
    link
    -15 months ago

    When you hire your lawyers based on the size of their boobs and not based on the size of their brains

    • nfh
      link
      65 months ago

      I suspect he picks them based on the size of their willingness to represent a work for a client famous for not paying people, who has a substantial amount of his assets supervised by courts because he lost a fraud suit, whose attorneys have a habit of pleading guilty to felonies they committed on his behalf or being disbarred, who seems largely incapable of listening to legal advice, or keeping his mouth shut in the name of self-preservation

    • @Jagger2097
      link
      25 months ago

      I’ve heard it’s not hard to fake being smart

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      The sick irony is she’s a managing partner for Habba, Madaio & Associates LLP. Like, somehow she passed the bar, yet doesn’t understand the basics of how to conduct a trial or how to behave with the decorum befitting a lawyer.

      Makes one wonder how she passed, vis a vis your prostitute statement…

    • @Nastybutler
      link
      65 months ago

      I would say that in many cases that is a difference without a distinction