• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4711 months ago

    Awesome, I hope this catches on, or at least serves as a tiny argument why egoists might not want to buy SUVs.
    In our small town, you practically can’t park an SUV on most parking spaces without reaching into the also-far-too-narrow sidewalk or street, but law enforcement is far too lenient for the egoists to care.

  • @taanegl
    link
    English
    19
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    John now regretted moving to France and starting his car rental company for American tourists, specifically catered to cross polinate traffic protestors across the continents. “Liberty Convoy Services” was now in shambles.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 months ago

    What counts as an SUV? Suzuki LJ80? Lada Niva? Parking those costs more than parking a Rolls Royce Phantom or Lincoln Continental?

    • Shadow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7111 months ago

      The prices will apply to vehicles weighing more than 1.6 tonnes with a combustion engine or hybrid vehicles, and more than 2 tonnes for electric vehicles. The move will not apply to Paris residents’ parking.

      So sounds like it’s weight based, which makes sense I think

        • gian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Right, just until you realize that 1.6 tons for a ICE car is basically a medium size car (my Scenic score 1.4 tons for example) and 2 tons exclude a lot of electric cars (for example 3 out of 4 Tesla)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1211 months ago

            1.6 tons is quite frankly an insane weight for a vehicle to transport an 80kg human around. That is 20 times the weight of what you want to transport, not to mention the volume overhead and required space on the road including safety distances.

            • gian
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 months ago

              As long as you are alone, I agree. But if you have a family a somewhat bigger car is not that wasted and the 1.6 tons limit cover a lot of cars that can be used by a family.
              If they really wanted to do something for the environment, like they justified the misure, they should have not put a limit on the EV (at least for now) and they should have used the engine capacity or power.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                311 months ago

                If anything people had bigger families in the past but somehow the capacity per car weight has gone down significantly, both for people and cargo.

                • gian
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 months ago

                  If anything people had bigger families in the past

                  Last time I was in France (4 years ago, before Covid) it was not uncommon to see families with 3 children, so I don’t know… maybe there are not that many in Paris…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            611 months ago

            I guess the car industry did not have any pressure to not make heavy as fuck cars until now. If this takes off across the continent, that will push down car weights a bit at least.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The car I had before I went car-free weighed 1.3 tons and was big enough to sleep in with 2 people on a real mattress, or to comfortably carry 5 people with their luggage, or transport a fridge.

      • rumschlumpel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Wouldn’t it make more sense to base it on length and width? I’d assume there’s already various taxes on fuel consumption, but in parking, length and width are what actually matters.

          • rumschlumpel
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            I’d assume that lack of space is a lot more critical than maintenance costs in Paris.

      • @nodimetotie
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        Which metric to use is also related to how they are going to enforce it. Surely they won’t weigh cars. It’s more realistic to base it on makes.

      • gian
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        Since they say that the SUVs are “bad for the environment” I would have used the engine displacement or power.

        • @TheGrandNagus
          link
          English
          411 months ago

          That would do nothing to stop giant EVs, which are just as bad for taking up huge amounts of space.

          • gian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            Wait, if we talk about taking up huge amount of space, using the weight does not make any sense: a Renault Espace or an Audi A6 are bigger than a my Scenic but they weight the same (some models anyway).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          Mayor Anne Hidalgo argued that SUVs are both dangerous and bad for the environment;

          It’s also size and height of the hood.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      There are lots of SUVs in Paris unfortunately. If you have kids and your car is a status symbol for you, SUVs are the default choice in France…