If they were just talking about Reddit, I’d assume something dodgy was going on connected with the IPO. But Quora is supposedly back from the dead too… Am I missing something glaringly obvious here?

    • Buelldozer
      link
      fedilink
      139
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s all kinds of bots; Russian, Chinese, Liberal, Conservative, but most of all its Reddits own bots meant to inflate traffic stats ahead of the IPO.

      • @IIII
        link
        229 months ago

        So what you’re saying is we should short the stock to make it big

        Could even open a lawsuit and force reddit to investigate how much of their traffic is bots, immediately after the IPO

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          This is not financial advice… typically these things balloon fast, and maybe stay up a week or two before anyone buying is done buying and the price collapses to the point informed investors want in. You can also have people doing price support early (“a squid on the bid”) to avoid a depressing price collapse in the opening phase, but that’s something you have to feel from experience.

    • DeJaVu
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Judging by the trending posts, its mostly us liberal bots :).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And Israeli bots (probably IDF and Pro-Israelis too)

      Seriously I just discovered this. Go search any random Gaza/Palestine/Israel post you will see -50 for someone saying “Israel has killed children and should stop killing children” and like +300 for “this article is so biased it’s taking about Israeli attacks but no mention of how Hamas is the real cause of this death”.

      I’m not even going to bother to link because I want people to see for themselves rather than it looking like I’m selecting the worst if it.

      • @merthyr1831
        link
        -18 months ago

        yeah but that’s sadly how a lot of real people think on Reddit anyway.

    • Dandroid
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      It probably has a lot to do with their IPO as well. They want to look like they are doing well ahead of that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -179 months ago

      That tired but always working deflection. Let me get a little creative. I’m pretty sure it’s underground blind mole rats this time.

      theys r comin 4r us, I’m telling ya, mark my wurds. ya’ll bein minefukd while yous wer sleepin

      How’s my russian? did I do it right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1039 months ago

      Reddit probably isn’t, as that would be cooking their metrics and Huffman would get fucked by the long arm of the SEC. They might still be, Huffman loves Elon and Elon got away with tons of shit.

      Advertisers are probably paying more content farms to astroturf it though.

      Plus without the API, do you really think people just stopped scraping Reddit? They just run a headless Chrome instance now and I bet Reddit doesn’t look the gift horse of traffic in the mouth.

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Advertisers are probably paying more content farms to astroturf it though.

        Yup, in fact we just banned ~13 accounts tonight from a subreddit I’m still involved with. That’s just the ones we identified, and it’s only a medium sized subreddit

        A user noticed that the responses to a post sounded a little off and reported it. Turns out there was a network of bots using generative AI to mix real academic advice (ex. “Go talk to the advising office”) with occasional subtle advertisements (ex. “I recommend using grammarly and (advertised service)”.

        Once we caught on, we looked through the history of those accounts and gathered as many as we could identify and banned them all.

        I don’t think this is Reddit’s doing, and they’re usually good about banning spam bots site wide once a mod report is made. Still, they benefit from increased activity and they have an incentive to do less of that. It was also much harder to notice the problem because of the AI generation. If a user didn’t explicitly report it, I probably wouldn’t have noticed

        • @Grimy
          link
          389 months ago

          I highly suggest you ban what the were advertising and not just the account.

          If advertiser’s realize the shady bot farms they deal with are causing any comment that mentions their product to be automatically deleted, they will stop.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          249 months ago

          This is going to be the Idiocratizing of the internet. AI is going to be training in itself with these unidentified posts and get dumber and dumber.

          Let’s hope no one lets it have access to anything important…

          It feels a little like how steel from before above ground nuclear testing, called low-background (or pre-war) steel because it isn’t contaminated is prized for building some sensors.

          Pre AI information need to be preserved, otherwise we might not really know if the info we’re seeking is fact based in any way.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              99 months ago

              93/94 was when I first got AOL on a 14.4k modem. I’m one of those shitty users!

              We used to use gopher and college FTP sites to download warez as a freshman in HS, and then moved on to Hotline trackers.

            • @Pronell
              link
              29 months ago

              I know, because I was there!

              • Buelldozer
                link
                fedilink
                49 months ago

                I was too. The internet was never for normies or businesses and between the two of them they’ve managed to turn it into a complete dumpster fire.

      • Hypx
        link
        fedilink
        459 months ago

        Except I can totally see them committing securities fraud in order to pump up the numbers. It seems very much like something they would do.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          189 months ago

          I think that’s what this part of the comment was about:

          They might still be, Huffman loves Elon and Elon got away with tons of shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        229 months ago

        The SEC got its funding slashed by Trump - are they like the IRS now where they don’t have the resources to truly do the job anymore?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        The API is not gone, and is still free for both “for non-commercial researchers and academics under our published usage threshold” and “for moderator tools and bots”

        https://www.redditinc.com/blog/apifacts

        There are several ways to add your personal API key to (modified) final versions of Sync, Relay, Infinity, and even Apollo on iOS to be able to continue to use those clients, however Reddit has changed how Reddit links work, so those methods are becoming more and more broken.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      689 months ago

      Did you guys read the article? It’s all about how since google and Reddit penned a deal to use Reddit to train google AI models, google is now massively pushing Reddit links in search results.

      And their answer, ironically, is to avoid “Gen-AI garbage.”

      But you should really read the article. It pissed me the fuck off. Because that sounds…massively illegal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        I wonder if Reddit user activity has noticeably increased. Probably not.

        Like, this will help Reddit in the short term, and honestly is a good idea from a search perspective (how many queries have I manually appended “Reddit” to?), but it doesn’t necessarily help with the fundamentals of the platform.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    98
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think I’ve comment this before but over the pandemic years I did a little experiment. Every day I bookmarked the obvious content reposting bot accounts on the first few pages of r/all. After a while I checked back on the accounts. The majority of them become cryptocurrency spam bots. A very small percentage spam random things. There was an extremely high success rate of picking out the bot accounts. Pretty much all them were except for maybe a handful.

    spez is basically exit scamming with reddit. Whoever is buying the dataset is getting robbed blind. That’s if reddit inc isn’t being upfront behind closed doors. Maybe they are. After all reddit does have well over a decade of mostly organic activity. The recent data has to be absolute trash though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      It isn’t like you can’t otherwise get the older data if you really want though, pretty sure it’s on torrents. The newer stuff is all they have to sell.

      • @thesporkeffect
        link
        38 months ago

        Google wants the data to be exclusively licensed, so they can pursue any competing LLMs and sue them to death - I mean, develop a ‘moat’

        It’s not really about the actual data access

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          I don’t buy that, given

          1. All the effort Reddit has put into locking down data access

          2. Google itself was behind the lawsuit establishing fair use for scraped datasets, and it’s looking likely that will be upheld

          Would be happy to hear it if there’s reasons I’m not aware of that this is the intention though

    • @force
      link
      55
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yeah this isn’t Reddit but more than 80% (>4/5) of Twitter is bots. It’s to the point where you can find any blue checkmark account, reply to them with a prompt, and more likely than not they’ll have a wacky and clearly autogenerated response. Sometimes they just reply things like “sorry, I can’t generate content that depicts violence” to random posts too.

      Dead internet theory is almost a reality and I hate it. It’s already happened to Google search results / blogs.

      • @Fades
        link
        68 months ago

        Almost? It’s been a thing for awhile. Shit, Reddit got started by using bots to feign engagement. It’s just that it’s gotten so much easier and faster

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      338 months ago

      I had my Reddit very heavily curated, my subs were mostly smaller subreddits. I was incredibly active and had my settings so that anything I voted on would not appear on my homepage. I got to see a ton of posts because of that.

      Around 2021, I started noticing that reposts weren’t just people coming in and posting things we’ve seen a dozen times because they had no way to know it was a repost. It was bot networks that would take top posts and then other bot accounts would recreate the original post’s comment section. The accounts followed patterns and became really obvious to spot after a while.

      The original tells were the bots taking really specific posts that only made sense in that context. Popular post from last Christmas? The bot doesn’t know what Christmas is, sees a popular post from a few months ago and reposts someone happy about their gifts in August. Look at this beautiful picture I took of the summer Alaskan wilderness this morning but it’s February. The photography subreddits were obvious because the bots would rotate the picture a few degrees which would sometimes ruin the picture’s aesthetic.

      I’m not sure if it was just me spotting them easier or if they were really ramping up into 2022 but by the time they killed API access and I stopped using it, I think over 80% of posts were bots. Made leaving the site way easier.

      • FartsWithAnAccent
        link
        English
        88 months ago

        Yeah, repost bots were out of control and places like freekarma4u helped them propagate for years with no interference from reddit. Would’ve been simple to shut that down if they were really worried about stopping bots but instead they ignored numerous reports, allowing the bots to run rampant.

      • @merthyr1831
        link
        168 months ago

        cross posting bots are a lot less problematic to me than bots designed to mimic human engagement to said cross posts

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    899 months ago

    As someone who still semi-frequents reddit, it’s mostly bots, more and more of which are clearly using some form of ChatGPT or another LLM. It’s actually kinda absurd, I’ve seen many a comment chains where it’s just different bots replying to each other, both pretending to be real people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      469 months ago

      If bots actually do start frequenting Reddit, and they get hard to detect, the AI content generation will start poisoning itself. Isn’t that cool?

      • @ninja
        link
        English
        209 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        179 months ago

        For me, the cool part is that the vast majority of people can’t tell anything has changed.

        Also, we can be rather poisonous ourselves.

    • @Couldbealeotard
      link
      English
      219 months ago

      I must say I’ve seen in increase of conversations on Reddit that seem like everyone involved has severe lead poisoning.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    819 months ago

    It’s sort of become a bit of a meme to end every google question with ‘reddit’ to trick it into showing you an actual human response. I’m sure that’s been good for traffic

    • @FleetingTit
      link
      18 months ago

      Bots produce traffic as well, though. So it’s absolutely possible that traffic increased significantly. Just not in a meaningful way.

  • @fidodo
    link
    English
    758 months ago

    I wonder if there was some kind of technological revolution that made it exponentially easier to generate text that happened recently.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    619 months ago

    Subs picked to be “mainstream” get botted to death and every other sub is half dead, so not really. Quality fell off a cliff.

  • @hairinmybellybutt
    link
    569 months ago

    I cannot wait for reddit going public, it’s going to generate so much drama, that’s going to be soooo good.

    Lemmy instances brace yourself

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Im just sad my bank won’t let me buy puts without using my house or business as collateral

  • @Darkard
    link
    English
    55
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The article seems to suggest a change on the Google search algo and how Reddit pumps the SEO is to blame as it’s showing up in search rankings above other more relevant results.

    I’m assuming “traffic” here is individual page visits, which would shoot up if people are just pulling up one page from a “how do I do X” type of search. I doubt this boost is coming from people sticking around, but I’m sure that’s not how Reddit will spin it.

    • BirdEnjoyer
      link
      fedilink
      359 months ago

      This would be my guess- Reddit is more reliable for random queries than much of the internet, as AI propagates.

      I see more and more suggested “my search Reddit” on Google even as I visit Redfit way less now

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I do believe reddit pops up in my search results more frequently these days than it did a year ago, without any explicit prompting with ‘reddit’ keyword… (just based on my impression, though)

      • Sabata11792
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I honesty can’t search a damn thing and not have Reddit be the first result. I basically been using AI over search to fix things… probably as intended.

        That or google bought a lot of shares ahead if IPO.

          • Sabata11792
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Not saying its bad info sometimes. There’s a reason most of us used reddit. It just seems like its the new SEO optimized background noise now. It’s not what I’m looking for, and I rather avoid the site now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      Yes and no. No, it’s not Reddit doing it. Yes, Google is strongly favoring reddit results. They are combating AI content in this manner.

      Google searches are becoming worthless more and more. This may be the beginning of the end for them unless users quickly adopt their generative search approach when they release it.

  • RBG
    link
    fedilink
    549 months ago

    Simplest explanation is that the general public doesn’t give a shit and while Facebook is on the downturn (not sure if numbers can back that up) people need to go somewhere else. Maybe that is reddit right now, they got the marketing and content to get people on it.

    • @_sideffect
      link
      119 months ago

      I’d like to hear that crapbook is going downhill, but its share price says otherwise

      • AggressivelyPassive
        link
        fedilink
        299 months ago

        Its share price doesn’t matter in this context, since Meta also owns Instagram, which is absolutely not going downhill at the moment.

        Facebook however is losing active users, especially in the younger age ranges and even more pronounced in Europe and the US.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        199 months ago

        Enron’s share price was very high right up until the end, too. Share price is not necessarily a good indicator of underlying fundamentals

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    399 months ago

    Yes. Google is strongly favoring both in search results in their feeble, and failing, attempt to combat AI.

  • Atemu
    link
    fedilink
    38
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Google has massive swing; there’s a whole industry around getting Google to prefer your low quality crap nobody wants to see over others’ low quality crap nobody wants to see.

    If Google has finally figured out a metric to measure “helpfulness” of a website and punishes unhelpful websites, a bunch of dogshit that would have otherwise gotten top spots may have been banished to page 2.
    Reddit results would naturally creep up because of that (and therefore get a lot more clicks), even if they didn’t change at all.

    • @BananaTrifleViolin
      link
      English
      229 months ago

      Didn’t Reddit signpost that they’d signed a deal with Google over AI? Is Google driving visitors to Reddit in exchange and to their benefit?

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      119 months ago

      Google directly said a few months ago that they’re changing their algorithm to expose more Reddit content.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The whole reason that Google exists today is that their PageRank algorithm was a great way to identify good content. At its basics, it worked by counting the number of pages that linked to a certain page. More incoming links meant the page was more useful. It didn’t matter how many relevant search terms you stuffed into your page. What matters was votes from other people, expressed in the form of linking to your page.

      But, that algorithm failed for 2 reasons. One is that it became cheaper and easier to put up sites that linked to sites you wanted to promote. The other was that people stopped blogging on their own blogs, and stopped creating their own websites, and instead used walled gardens like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, etc. That meant it was hard to measure links back to a site, and that it was easier to create fake links.

      So, now it’s a constant war of SEO people vs. Google Search Quality people, and the Google people are losing. Sometimes there are brief victories for Google which result in good Reddit results appearing higher up. Then the SEO people catch up and either pollute Reddit and/or push Reddit links off the first page.

      It would all be really depressing even if it weren’t for generative AI being used to pollute everything. With LLMs coming in and vomiting their content all over everything, we might be forced back to the bad old days of Yahoo where some individual human curated lists of good things and 99% of content was invisible.

  • @whotookkarl
    link
    389 months ago

    Not even close if we’re talking about current users or active contributers. After they shut down third party apps and sided with advertisers over mods there was a huge migration off platform to several other platforms. Many smaller subreddits are ghost towns and the biggest ones that are still active have a smaller participating community, less total votes, and changing norms.

    It’s not just eternal September, it’s the same thing that happened when digg died in reverse where communities grew and changed because people were joining. Users are adding site:reddit.com or whatever to Google searches because of SEO general searches are an advertising dumpster fire, but those search results are going to degrade over time along with the site’s quality if they continue to make such shitty decisions for communities and users or people move to other ai based search tools.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      169 months ago

      Where did everyone go? I thought Lemmy was the new hangout but it still seems so small, even popular posts are only getting a handful of comments?

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        219 months ago

        Well, the federation kinda spreads users out. Like I can’t login to kbin on my Lemmy apps but I can see kbin posts, but the vast majority of my time is on lemmy. IOW it’s harder to participate across instances so less people.

        There are other platforms that are probably suffering some form of the same fate, they got an influx of ex-redditors, but not a high enough volume to really take off and get high participation rates.

        I dunno, I prefer Lemmy/fediverse. The churn isn’t there so you can actually interact with people instead of competing with inane reddit quips and top comment retreads.

      • The Bard in Green
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        For me, Lemmy content is better in every way, EXCEPT for local subs / communities. I really miss my well populated, engaged local subs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        I think its that many people didnt really leave reddit, some migrated to lemmy, some to discord, some to other small sites, and some just quit that style of website.

        Lemmy definitely is still pretty small, but i think its growing pretty well (i remember checking it out years ago and it being a super tiny niche site). It takes time for things to set up & for users to get comfortable and grow communities they care about. Organic growth is slow.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        It feels much more filled out than after the initial exodus. Smaller/niche communities are pretty bare, though.

  • @SomeGuy69
    link
    348 months ago

    IPO padding for the CEOs golden parachute.