• @riodoro1
    link
    732 months ago

    Is every stupid shit legal in the US?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    452 months ago

    I still can’t believe this is actually a real car. It’s beyond stupid, it’s what I’d expect someone to come up with in a zombie apocalypse with welded sheet metal or something.

  • @Gigan
    link
    452 months ago

    Now put truck nuts on it

    • @Jimmyeatsausage
      link
      622 months ago

      If the truck wasn’t assigned nuts at the factory you can’t just add them later. It’s unnatural.

      • IndiBrony
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You can’t tell my truck which transmission to be!

    • @geekworking
      link
      212 months ago

      It’s a subscription feature that you can unlock for only $79.95 per month.

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    English
    442 months ago

    Does the cybertruck have just 1 giant wiper? That seems…fucking stupid. You can see the passenger top side of the windshield isn’t clear which might be needed. Also the wiper blade must surely be proprietary meaning, wait I can just look it up: $75. Less than I thought somehow.

    • @tautalas
      link
      562 months ago

      Benz did it better with one

      • @Treczoks
        link
        202 months ago

        But that is Mercedes-Benz, a company that is already known for being able to design a car. The “cybertruck” looks like it was designed by a ten year old, and, as the wiper shows, not actually smartly executed.

      • @yuriy
        link
        142 months ago

        The wipers on the mercedes work better than two blade setups as well. You don’t get that trailing line of water off the tip of the wiper right in the center of your view because the one blade extends all the way to the edge, all the way across.

      • @ProfessorProteus
        link
        English
        102 months ago

        I’m not a mechanical engineer but I’m still getting hot and bothered watching that. What a cool design!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        I have a 93 Mercedes with this system and I love showing off the wiper. Its unexpected motion brings joy to both mechanical nerds and regular people. No joke, people see it and can’t help but grin. It’s that perfect combination where it looks odd but also is immediately recognizable as clearly superior.

        Must have been patents that kept it from catching on?

        • @TwentySeven
          link
          42 months ago

          As a car nerd, I think it’s really cool. I’d smile seeing one in action.

          As a car owner, I wouldn’t want one. There are enough things to go wrong on cars as it is. I want something simple that works, not one more thing that might cost me money or ruin my weekend.

          It works for Mercedes because their target market (in the US anyway) buys a new car every couple years, and isn’t put off by over engineering.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 months ago

            Surprisingly it’s been wiping since 93 with no issues! Unless it was changed by a previous owner. I should probably take it apart and repack the gearbox at this point, though. It slows down quite a bit if the windshield isn’t wet enough, implying there’s some drag in the system.

            Back in the early 90s Mercedes were a lot different from how they are today, that car is put together so well that those old diesels are considered a true million mile car. Lots of things on it are really easy to take apart and maintain, too.

            The only thing really failing on it is the paint which is cracked all to hell, and I’m honestly considering getting a repaint since there are only 200k miles on it. It helps that I’m friends with a body man/painter who can do it in his garage for a fraction of the cost.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            I agree with keeping things simple, because more things mean more chance of failure, which eventually just becomes a matter of how frequently over time. However, this is a pretty simple design. It’s a clever use of simple mechanisms. From the gif above, it’s an extra gear with a linear actuator attached. It’s not doing anything complex other than just cycling the actuator twice over the course of the full half circle –or four times a cross the entire gear if it could go all the way around. This is probably not going to be the thing that breaks, and even if it is it’s probably easily replaceable (if it became common so the parts are available).

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Mercedes is often at the forefront of new car tech. It doesn’t always catch on, though.

      • @TwentySeven
        link
        22 months ago

        I like the cyber truck wiper better. It looks perfectly functional, and I’m not a huge fan of the German overengineering.

        Side note, I love Toyota, but the FJ cruiser’s windshield wipers are stupid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It is one blade and it has good enough reach that the driver would have no complaints about coverage.

      The reason they did it like this is because Elon is over ambitious and over hypes everything and originally wanted a wiper that was vertical and moved in a linear motion back and forth across the windshield.

      Obviously they didn’t engineer that and settled for the comically large standard blade that ships with it. I’m also curious how much one of those bad boys costs. Probably more than 2 for a standard car

      • @Dultas
        link
        62 months ago

        Also where to get it. I don’t think AutoZone is carrying 50in wiper blades standard.

    • @Etterra
      link
      12 months ago

      Notes that you pointed that out i can’t unsee it, and it is stupidly hilarious.

  • @MrJameGumb
    link
    382 months ago

    Wow I’ve never seen one out in the wild before! I also wouldn’t have imagined anyone could make it look even more obnoxious but here we are lol

      • @aidan
        link
        12 months ago

        Nobody on this site can call others a dork, including me

    • @FrowingFostek
      link
      62 months ago

      “Where were the handsome bulls and the handsome bull-fighters now? It appeared that even in Barcelona there were hardly any bullfights nowadays; for some reason all the best matadors were Fascists.” -George Orwell

  • ME5SENGER_24
    link
    222 months ago

    Its the ugliest vehicle since the Pontiac Aztec

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        The Multipla’s price tag at launch was a little over $16,000 and no right-wing suprematist hyped tf out of it

      • ME5SENGER_24
        link
        4
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s bad. Really bad, but somehow less worse

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Who is that car even for?! I had the misfortune of getting one as a rental once, and it barely had a 200 mile range in the tank, had basically zero room for luggage or anything in the trunk, 5 adults probably wouldn’t even fit, and it didn’t feel that great to drive. And that’s all before mentioning how ugly it is!

          • ArxCyberwolf
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            I genuinely hope that most Juke drivers I see are forced to due to circumstance, because I honestly can’t see why anyone would intentionally pick one. They’re just so horrendously ugly and impractical, as you said.

      • @SkippingRelax
        link
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maybe you are right but you know what? I know maybe a dozens people who owned a multipla (mostly fiat employees or had access to discounts). None of them ever thought it looked good, or that it was cool.

        Edit: i should also add, for those who will look up this monstrosity, also check out the original fiat 600 multipla from the 1950s. That might work as eye bleach

  • @over_clox
    link
    152 months ago

    I can’t help but wonder what the dashcam and computer thinks of that shit 😂🤣

    • The Pantser
      link
      52 months ago

      The glorified cruise control should be disabled if there are modifications like that.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        82 months ago

        As much as I hate cybertrucks and the sort of people who would buy them, I hate the diminishing of our property rights even more and thus have to object to the notion of manufacturers punishing people for exercising their right to modify their property. Frankly, the “glorified cruise control” ought to be Free Software to begin with so that the owner could modify it as well, to be compatible with the horns. (The owner would of course be legally responsible for the result, but that goes without saying since it’s how property law has worked for hundreds of years.)

        What should happen is that if the modifications make the car unsafe (whether because of the cruise control, the horns themselves failing pedestrian safety standards, or otherwise), the government prohibits the owner from driving it on public roads. But the keys are that it would be a restriction by government (not the manufacturer) of how the thing could be used affecting the public (not whether it’s allowed to exist at all).

        • lad
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          Yeah, without the last part I would’ve argued about safety, but restricting the use while allowing modification seems quite good. Except I’m not sure how to enforce safety checks often enough

      • @over_clox
        link
        62 months ago

        Oh I’d certainly hope so, that’s a given. Still seems like it would trigger some sort of constant warning though.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Real question: how can you tell the difference between rust and a supposed patina that forms and changes over time? I’m not talking about Cybertrucks, those are just rusting. But some chromium based metals supposedly can do this over time and can look like rust initially. Does rust usually cause pitting or flaking?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 months ago

          No, patina is a thin layer of oxidation on top of the actual material from contact with the air.

          Rust is corrosion from air + moisture, and causes pitting and flaking. Patina should just sit over the surface, but not distort the thing it’s on.

          There is more nuance to it, but patina is on top, rust is the actual thing turning into rust

          • Neato
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Thanks. I’ve got a metal decoration made from weathering steel that has what appears to be rust spots all over it. Allegedly it will do this onto the entire surface and eventually fade into a darker color. But it’s been pretty slow. But no putting or flaking at least.

      • @over_clox
        link
        22 months ago

        Don’t worry, that’s normal. It’s maturing.