• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    107
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    What does PlayStation 4 have to do with this? Am I getting old?

    Is this BoneAppleTea?

    • subignition
      link
      fedilink
      638 months ago

      The only reading that is making sense to me is shorthand for “pays for”, but I’ve never seen that slang in the wild so I have no idea

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Speech to text system is my guess. I don’t know if more people are using it or what but it never used to be this common.

    • @fireweed
      link
      35
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I assume it’s shorthand for “pays for”

      My understanding is most shorthand/euphemisms nowadays seem to originate from tiktok’s strict and sometimes inscrutable censorship rules. Maybe this is one of them?

      Edit: apparently this was a case of text-to-speech gone away. I prefer my head cannon of tiktok trying to censor conversations about anyone who “pays for” an elicit service.

      • @alphanerd4OP
        link
        38 months ago

        frfr its kind of staying in because it quadruples engagement. i like that tiktok headcannon

  • @reversebananimals
    link
    English
    608 months ago

    Ticketing people who don’t pay for parking is “bullying?”

    This is pretty insulting to people who have actually suffered from real bullying. There’s plenty of real problems in the world to be righteously angry about. Maybe let’s not post shitty Facebook memes on Lemmy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      It’s meter cops who camp on your car in case your meter runs out before you make it back, so they can give you a full ticket for one second of “stolen parking”, you physicality thief, you.

  • @fireweed
    link
    478 months ago

    Eh, I’m not sure how I feel about this one. Parking is a huge thorn in the side of transportation reform, and ensuring parking turnover is actually pretty crucial to a functional transportation system. On-street parking is public right-of-way that could be a bike lane, enhanced bus stop, street seating for restaurants/cafes, parklets, drainage swales, large medians for trees, wider sidewalks, the list goes on. However we don’t get these nice things because “wE NeEd ThE pArKiNg SuPpLy.” Except often you’ll find that there would be sufficient supply to remove the parking on even just one side of the street if turnover were higher, and turnover is not higher because people are abusing the parking. Things like store employees parking all day in spots meant for customers, people using on-street parking to avoid more expensive lots at the destinations they’re actually visiting (like entertainment venues), etc. Have you ever encountered a parking meter that would only let you put in 2 hours of money even though you need the spot for much longer, and you had to run out mid-way through whatever you were doing to feed the meter? That means you were probably not the intended user for that space and you should have found longer-term parking elsewhere. Maybe that store manager that runs outside every other hour to feed the meter rather than use an all-day parking lot (but that’s a three-block walk away and this parking is right here!!1) or taking public transportation (because that’s beneath them) would rethink this behavior after an expensive ticket. Point is, I’m not sure helping people skirt parking regulations is fighting the system or standing up for the little guy.

    • @saltesc
      link
      98 months ago

      Also doesn’t make the ticket redundant. Even before the ticket’s completed, once it starts being made it’s done. So whatever the fine was +0.25¢ is payback earnings for that person being a part of the automobile problem. A win for environment and infrastructure.

      • @fireweed
        link
        178 months ago

        This was cross-posted to “usauthoritarianism”

        Otherwise I wouldn’t really care, but like wtf. Of all examples of authoritarianism/fighting the system, feeding a parking meter? What is this, anarchy for infants?

      • @saltesc
        link
        48 months ago

        Huh. I thought meme groups posted memes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -48 months ago

      Oh no fuck that. I live in a country where fucking roadside peddlers and adjacent businesses have basically turned the street into their business and I can easily say I prefer the cars. It’s fucking terrible.

  • @Katana314
    link
    English
    458 months ago

    So fucked up that the town wouldn’t pay for a human position and instead has a PlayStation 4 handing out the meter fines.

  • @PunnyName
    link
    258 months ago

    Ok the one hand, FTP.
    On the other hand, fuck cars.

    But, paid parking is the better route here, since free parking is a plague on actually getting walkable cities.

  • SharkEatingBreakfast
    link
    fedilink
    258 months ago

    It’s actually illegal to add money to other people’s parking meters (where I live, at least).

    Disgusting that there’s laws against it.

  • @Ultragigagigantic
    link
    138 months ago

    This is a small part of the reason why they switched to those little electronic vending machines. That and so they don’t have to pay to have people go out and empty them

  • Trollivier
    link
    fedilink
    108 months ago

    You guys still use coins with parking meters? Haven’t seen those is 15 years.