• notabot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can you imagine how offended you’d be if these were serious payments and the bank suggested you were joking? I have a mental image of a jihadist having an meltdown because their bank didn’t take them seriously.

  • riodoro1
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Like the actual taliban would label their payments this way.

  • I_Fart_Glitter
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 years ago

    I used to write a check to my room mate and then she would write the rent check to the landlord. My checks to her always said “For: Sexual favors and drugs ;)” No one contacted us.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been doing this for decades. I find raunchy copypasta and put it in the notes section of etransfers. Nobody is investigating something because of what’s in the notes field.

  • narp@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 years ago

    I marked my rent payments to my roommate with “Cocaine and Hookers”, went on for years but his bank complained one day too.

    Funny to imagine if the banks managers were actually using our money for exactly that, but marked as company expenses instead.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    The most unrealistic thing about this post is the bank not immediately blocking this user and dropping them from all banking services. Taking the time to investigate and not dropping the customer… Incredible

    • mac@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think the bank is smart enough to understand they were probably drunk and joking, if they were actually performing terrorist acts with the funds then they wouldn’t label them so plainly. Closing someone’s bank can cause a lot of issues in their life so it is more fair to warn them first.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree that is the reality we should live in, I’m not so sure that’s the reality we do live in as experienced by most banking customers.

        • mac@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          Starling are a newer bank as well and seem to be more forward thinking. An older bank may be likely to ban your account for this.

          • MimicJar
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            They really aren’t. Honestly most banks don’t care what “illegal” things you do as long as you give them plausible deniability.

            If you cause the bank more problems than you do bringing them in money, then they’re more likely to ban you. Even in this example they’re stating that you shouldn’t use these words, just that they are required to investigate these words.

            Also if they genuinely thought you were performing illegal activities they wouldn’t tell you, they would had it off to the proper cover your ass department.

            That being said, don’t actually test what words bank monitor, since, as I mentioned, if you’re a pain in the ass on purpose they’ll probably drop you, or at the very least freeze funds for a long time.

      • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        My bank once disabled my access to my funds out of the blue and told me to come in person because they have to check stuff like terrorist funding for each client from time to time, same thing happened to a colleague. So banks blocking you suddenly and without warning is very much a thing

    • Dozzi92
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      For real, “Hey, we’re investigating you, good opportunity to hide your stuff now.” And if a bank were literally concerned about terrorism (like HSBC?), I imagine they’d forward directly on to their legal department or law enforcement. Maybe. I dunno, I’m just some guy.

      99% of my Venmos are for hookers and cocaine though.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dropping business? PFFFFFT, see, that’s why you’re not a banker, you put silly things like possible threats and societal security above profits! Criminals and terrorists need banking services, banks can rat them out and come out as good guys, it’s win-win!

  • Dasnap
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    UK even making you pay for a jihad license now.

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve heard people doing this and then getting black listed from the entire banking system. Can’t open bank accounts, access any credit, and the banks don’t have to tell you why you’re blacklisted. It’s supposed to be very very difficult to undo.

  • Panda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    the so called freedom fighters on the right when i make a $500 wire transfer with the description “supplies for firebombing majorie taylor greene’s home on october 29th, 2027”

  • renrenPDX
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Next check: definitely NOT for “ISIS Training “ 😉😉

  • THCDenton
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    My cousin used to employ his brother-in-law. He’d always write ‘sex’ on his checks :D

  • AuxBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    There’s no FBI in UK.

    • doingthestuff
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      There’s always at least one FBI agent at the US Embassy there. I’d guess there are probably a few more.

      And to mess with my head, I saw there was a full FBI office in London. But then I saw it was London, Kentucky.

    • Clbull
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      We have our own agencies.

      The National Crime Agency (NCA) is our equivalent to the FBI.

      Security Service (a.k.a. MI5) is our equivalent to the NSA.

      Secret Intelligence Service (a.k.a. MI6) is our equivalent to the CIA.

    • T00l_shed
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Except the investigation into him can get brushed aside…