• @Tikiporch
      link
      English
      66 months ago

      Yes, their evil plot finally laid bare. Copy what Mastercard and Visa have been doing since the 80s.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    816 months ago

    So, advertising the things I have already bought? Not sure thats gonna be super successful…

    • miss phant
      link
      fedilink
      English
      436 months ago

      Amazon has done that for the past 2 decades and it has somehow worked.

        • @ours
          link
          English
          96 months ago

          Gonna catch’em all!

          • half coffee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            66 months ago

            pictures someone trying to catch fridges like in some kind of video game

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          96 months ago

          Perhaps more like what fridge companies do via incessant water filter replacement reminders: Enjoying your Super Deluxe CoolPlus™ Fridge? Don’t forget to check out the CoolPlus™ Fridge Magnetic Spice Rack and CoolPlus™ Fridge Juice Dispenser Add-on!

          • @jaybone
            link
            English
            16 months ago

            Also enjoy your device randomly breaking every few years.

            • @pdxfed
              link
              English
              26 months ago

              At some point the bigwigs will realize that a working item is worth more in future potential ad dollars than a broken one with a limited 1 year warranty and start asking their engineers why quality is so bad.

              /The screams of 1,000 poor souls per second for 50 years

              • @jaybone
                link
                English
                16 months ago

                They did that like 60 years ago. Then they stopped.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          116 months ago

          Maybe they won’t suggest things you already bought, but will estimate what you’re going to buy next, based on the statistical analysis of people who bought the same things.

          • @Poayjay
            link
            English
            96 months ago

            Yeah it’s more like, hey you just bought stabilizing jacks and a water hose for a travel trailer. You must have just bought a new camper. Let’s bombard you with add for stick-up-hooks, rv-mattress sized sheets, cheap plastic dishes, etc.

    • @Evotech
      link
      English
      96 months ago

      If only it was smart enough. Make its like oh you bought a newtv, you would like this new surround system

        • @ours
          link
          English
          106 months ago

          The “people usually both this with this product” suggestions can be pretty good to cover this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      with stuff like this, usually the objective is to advertise based on patterns across purchase histories

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        I’m sure thats the theory, and whats being sold to the ad buyers, but my money is on it ending up like the ads you get after buying something from amazon/ebay: same item you just bought.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          you probably just notice that because it doesn’t make sense from your perspective.

          it’s probably more cost efficient for advertisers to just throw relevant ads at potential groups. Determining whether an individual already has the item is a waste of resources, and you probably don’t notice when the ads are things you don’t own.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            06 months ago

            Last time I observed this I was getting the exact same item that I bought being advertised to me constantly, across multiple sites. No variation at all. It was a pair of hiking shoes. If it had then offered me hiking poles or rain coats or anything else that would have been useful, but instead it was the same pair of shoes I had already purchased.

            If the ad network had actually suggested useful paired items that i dont already own, then those ads should actually stand out, as they are actually relevant to me.

            If its not cost efficient to actually target to the individual (and I dont doubt that it isn’t), im not sure what Paypal is bringing to the table here that Amazon etc can’t already do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      More like using your past purchases to predict what you will most likely be prone to buy next

    • @grue
      link
      English
      246 months ago

      That’s why the only safe software in the long term is Free Software.

    • @Olhonestjim
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Corpo apps are like

      “Do you love me? Rate 5 stars?”

      No I don’t love you. How about zero stars for sexual harassment? Do I need to talk to HR?

      • @RGB3x3
        link
        English
        96 months ago

        Fucking within like 2 minutes of using their apps too, they ask, “do you like the app?” Then another popup that says, “provide feedback for why you don’t like our app?”

        Because you keep getting in the way of me actually doing what I need to do. And it’s getting uninstalled as soon as I’m done with it.

        • @jaybone
          link
          English
          56 months ago

          It’s to the point where no one wants to do shit on their website anymore. They force you to download the app. So they can get even more access and control of your info. And like I need more motherfucking apps on my goddamn home screens. Fuck that shit.

    • @romp_2_door
      link
      English
      416 months ago

      It’ll probably launch in the US only to avoid GDPR concerns

    • Rikudou_Sage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      They’ll give you $2 or something like that if you give them consent. You would be surprised how well that works.

      • VodkaSolution
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        Still not possible under EU law (as meta for the no-ads paid subscription)

        • Rikudou_Sage
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          That’s very different, they want you to either pay or not have access. This would be you still having access, but being paid for giving them data voluntarily.

          That’s perfectly legal and employed across many European business entities.

          • VodkaSolution
            link
            fedilink
            English
            06 months ago

            You can’t tie selling user data to some user payment at that level

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 months ago

      By showing you an annoying popup every time you use PayPal, and eventually you’ll accidentally click OK and it will mysteriously remember this and never ask you again.

  • palordrolap
    link
    fedilink
    446 months ago

    Let me guess: I’ll buy a toaster because my old one died but then I’ll get ads for new toasters constantly. You bought one, you must want another. And another. And another. Why aren’t you buying more toasters. You bought one. Buy another! Buy twenty!! People who bought toasters also bought microwaves and kettles. Do you want a toaster? Does anyone want any toast?

    • @SlopppyEngineer
      link
      English
      166 months ago

      “No, I don’t want any toast. No toast. No buns, baps, baguettes or bagels. No crumpets. No croissants. No teacakes, no potato cakes, and no hot cross buns. And definitely no smegging flapjacks.”

      Yeah, that’s the future with AI.

    • r00ty
      link
      fedilink
      106 months ago

      Given that God is infinite, and that the universe is also infinite. Would you like a toasted teacake?

    • @TheFeatureCreature
      link
      English
      36 months ago

      It’s amazing that these companies spend ultraquadrillions on advertisement platforms and algorithms and all they ever seem to do is just spam products at you that you have already purchased. Where is all this money going?

    • @RaoulDook
      link
      English
      576 months ago

      Did you not know they’re already selling your purchase data? All the card networks do it.

      That’s why you need to use cash to buy anything you don’t want logged to create a data point about you to be sold

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        For items or just the shop? Because I write EPOS systems for a living, and as far as I can tell, we pass no item data to the credit card merchants.

        The shop is obviously passed to them. So maybe don’t buy from Dave’s Enormous Dildo Emporium.

        • @RaoulDook
          link
          English
          96 months ago

          The card companies can get data from the Merchant Category Code to infer the nature of purchases, without specifics. The stores also have a record of what items you bought, which could also be sold unless you have a contract with the store that guarantees they won’t sell your purchase history (at least in the countries without strong privacy laws)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            86 months ago

            That’s per store though, presumably when they sign up with a payment provider (because there’s a lot of rules about e.g. using credit cards to gamble with).

            If I buy sex toys from Tesco, it’s still showing up as “groceries”. If I buy from a sex shop, it’s going to be more clear cut.

            I can see from my emails that PayPal send out itemised receipts on behalf of their customers, so they’re definitely collecting more data than the big two.

            • @raspberriesareyummy
              link
              English
              4
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              If I buy from a sex shop, it’s going to be more clear cut.

              Life pro tip: Open a sex shop that sells groceries, to devalue the data analysis ^^

        • @jaybone
          link
          English
          46 months ago

          You mean DEDE? I love that place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    356 months ago

    So happy I deleted my account with them 5 years ago after going throught their laughably bad customer protection (the only reason I had them to begin with, I had figured it was a good idea to have a buffer between merchants and my CC)

    In the end, it was perfect because, as they refused to help, I went straight to the credit card to reverse the fraudulent charge and closed all accounts with PayPal… Then I get a whiny email from them when the CC took the funds and left them holding the bag… Sweet minor victory

      • @Throw_away_migrator
        link
        English
        186 months ago

        I feel like this could be used to describe any tech company that “innovates” or “disrupts” an area.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          146 months ago

          Correct… In late stage capitalism “innovation” means breaking some laws (Air B&B, Uber), smoke and mirrors (AI) or outright scams (Theranos)

          This is why all these new “innovations” need to flood the market as hard and fast as possible… Before anyone notices what they really are

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            76 months ago

            Throw enough investor money at lawyers and anything is legal for an amount of time.

            “Oh, I’m sowwy, did we bweak the law? Well here’s 5,000 boxes of paper that say we didn’t, see you in 18 months.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      The difference between selling your data and selling ads, is that only you can use your data. This is PayPal building a moat around its user private data so only they can use it.

  • Panda (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    316 months ago

    Well, this sucks. PayPal was great for only having your credit card information in one place - now it looks like I’ll have to risk it with every website.

    • @Flying_Hellfish
      link
      English
      126 months ago

      This has me seriously considering using a company like privacy.com to just create random CC numbers per sketchy website.

        • @Flying_Hellfish
          link
          English
          36 months ago

          Good to know, I’ll check them out as well! Thank you

        • @girthero
          link
          English
          36 months ago

          I like the concept if disposable CC numbers, but looks like i need to link both to my bank account. Anything like this that can link to another credit card?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Cap One 360 checking - free, and offers single use cards. Think they regen on each usage,and can get the number etc easily in app.

            Edit:missed “credit” card. Believe Cap One does same for their credit cards, not entirely sure tho. It’s becoming more common on credit, but def not “most” cards doing that yet

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Thought they charged something to put $ on temp card, via EFT though I may well be wrong.

            Don’t recall the org name I conflated w them anymore u fortunately.

            And from where I sit, yeah they pay me to some degree - the acct costs me nothing, and it’s got a handful of the usual “edge case” insurance benefits and such most debit cards don’t.

            Not real useful to me, admittedly, but I do receive something.

            That, and they reliably post direct deposit exactly 48h early, plus or minus fifteen minutes. Ability to plan my life around when exactly my check will show up has value. Seems to be very much a “best effort” basis to post early w/ most banks.

            Lots of that stuff is useful because of my individual habits and patterns of spending I’m sure, might well not be for you.

            Will check out privacy, now I’m kind of curious if there is something even more friction free for my scenario.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              It’s basically a credit card through an online bank that draws from a debit account.

              For me, as a later of protection, I made a free capital one account (any will do, cap one was mostly random and i don’t particularly endorse or hate them) and then the pdotcom “credit” draws from that. Their early implementation was using a prepaid debit card but they switched to credit like 2 years back and it’s been good ever since. Even with other solutions I can’t recommend enough taking a look.

    • @aceshigh
      link
      English
      56 months ago

      Get a credit card that allows you to generate a temp number.

  • snownyte
    link
    fedilink
    276 months ago

    I would’ve loved to have a paypal alternative if so many damn services would adopt them.

    And no I’m not talking Google Pay or Apple Pay. They’re just as bad.

    • @flames5123
      link
      English
      46 months ago

      How is Apple Pay just as bad? I haven’t heard anything that they do like this. There is no advertising in the Apple ecosystem. In fact, several places (like Walmart) don’t want to adopt the tap to pay because for some cards, it blocks tracking from them by using a pseudo randomized credit card number every time. It makes using the rewards for places a pain, but it works at maintaining harder tracking for whoever you’re paying.

    • cum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      There really isn’t going to be, besides giving them your card directly (or paying crypto🤢). PayPal is less about the software and more about the service, which isn’t something FOSS can really replace. An alternative would have to have a company behind it that works with major financial institutes and whatnot.

  • @rtxn
    link
    English
    276 months ago

    I hope they enjoy analzying my once-a-month subscription to FFXIV and nothing else.

    • Kushan
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Prepare to get inundated with ads for anime girls and other weeb shit.

      EDIT: To clarify, I mean “weeb” as a term of endearment rather than the pejorative.

  • just another dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    166 months ago

    I’m more surprised they hadn’t yet, to be honest.

    Over here regular banks have been doing that for years 😥

  • @olutukko
    link
    English
    126 months ago

    thsnks I’m out

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    96 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    PayPal will use data from billions of customer transactions to supercharge its nascent ad business.

    The new PayPal Ads group is headed by recent hire Mark Grether, a senior vice president and GM at PayPal, who says the budding advertising operation will “help make merchants smarter to sell more products and services effectively, as well as enable consumers to discover more of what they love.”

    But, his reported statement doesn’t really dwell on the fact that it will be using customer data, including purchase history, to pull this off.

    In addition to the main PayPal platform, it also operates cash transfer app Venmo and Honey, a browser extension designed to find deals online.

    The report also mentions that Venmo will see fewer ads served in order to not drive off its younger users.

    PayPal’s data on users’ purchases and other transactions, combined with AI, might prove to be great at advertising, though probably to the consternation and frustration of recipients.


    The original article contains 366 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 56%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!