• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    894 months ago

    May be something related to child resistant packaging. From the CPSC FAQ on the Poison Prevention Packaging ACT “For a package to be child-resistant, at least 85% of tested children must not be able to open the package during the first 5 minutes of the test”.https://www.cpsc.gov/FAQ/PPPA

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      364 months ago

      The bad news is your home is gone and your child with it in the massive flameball. The good news is, while we can’t quite say your kid was gifted

    • @5oap10116
      link
      English
      284 months ago

      There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists (in reference to why the Yosemite garbage cans are difficult to use)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        84 months ago

        Worked in Yellowstone.

        The bears are smarter than the majority of tourists.

        Humans, being able to read and having signs posted in multiple languages for them, choose to ignore the various hazards and blunder through them.

        Bears, only rarely, if ever, find themselves in trouble with natural features. And they can’t read the warning signs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 months ago

          Design a camp ground so that people who don’t read the rules naturally fall in a pit that the rules warned about. Clear out the pit about sunset, and bus the pit folk to a motel.

          • @Soku
            link
            English
            14 months ago

            Is that pit lined with mattresses so that those peeps will just isolate themselves for a day? I read the first sentence and nodded in approval: let the natural selection take the wheel but the second sentence made it much more humane.

    • @Treczoks
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      I remember my wife asking our kid to open some “child-proof” packaging for her.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    English
    494 months ago

    I believe it is indicating that the child lock is only 85% effective.

    How the hell they arrived at that number we may never know, but I’ll bet you it’s buried on page 4,987,253 in clause 6, subsection 8 of European Union Product Safety Report 156.421a. Or something.

    • @xantoxis
      link
      English
      324 months ago

      They just had a hundred babies try to pick the lock. Most of 'em couldn’t do it.

    • @Squorlple
      link
      English
      204 months ago

      85% of the time, it works every time

  • @UsernameHere
    link
    English
    364 months ago

    It means this product was made with 85% child slavery

  • @Leviathan
    link
    English
    174 months ago

    A guess? 85% childproof.

  • @Raab
    link
    English
    164 months ago

    Could be 85% alcohol and to keep locked away from children

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    84 months ago

    That baby icon clearly doesn’t like fire very much. Or maybe it’s mourning that it only has a 15%, per attempt, at stealing fire from the gods.

  • @I_Fart_Glitter
    link
    English
    44 months ago

    Where did you find this? What is the graphic to the left?

    I don’t think it’s related, but there is a brand of sewing/embrodery machines called Baby Lock (as in smaller, home use version of an industrial overlocker sewing machine). Its logo is just the words Baby Lock inside an oval, nothing with babies or locks.

  • @AA5B
    link
    English
    04 months ago

    deleted by creator