• themeatbridge
    link
    English
    1213 days ago

    Yeah, but in 1.8 trillion years, you’re going to be a minute late for everything.

      • @Vigge93
        link
        English
        163 days ago

        Damn right, you’d miss the Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster drink before the dinner. Not ok.

    • Cosmo
      link
      English
      323 days ago

      I mean but this should save me some hassle from my current clock that I need to adjust every 10 billion years.

    • @iAvicenna
      link
      English
      73 days ago

      Oh shit I missed the sun explosion!

  • @scutiger
    link
    English
    162 days ago

    Surely in 30 billion years nothing could possibly happen to the supercooled strontium to throw that off, right?

    • @jeffwOP
      link
      English
      40
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Remindme! 30 billion years

      Just give me a little bit of time, I got this. You’re gonna see!

  • nocturne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123 days ago

    Does it still need a groundhog to tell it when spring is?

    • Fredrik
      link
      English
      63 days ago

      Yes, of course.

      • @RizzRustbolt
        link
        English
        42 days ago

        But the groundhog will be made out of gallium arsenide.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Standard seconds are defined based on measurable properties of a cesium atom. The historical definition of 1/86400th of a day doesn’t work for science if the duration is inconsistent.

      For example the statement:

      Earth’s Days Are Getting 2 seconds Longer Every 100,000 Years

      becomes self-referencing and loses all meaning without some other reference point.

      • @RizzRustbolt
        link
        English
        12 days ago

        “I suppose”.

        Boom, now it’s a scientific unit.

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 days ago

      This is time relative to earth, and the actual passage of time in the universe that we aim to measure doesn’t care about the Earth’s rotation.

  • @solrize
    link
    English
    03 days ago

    What do you set it to?

    • @corroded
      link
      English
      183 days ago

      In clocks like this, the “set time” is often irrelevant. It’s more important to know exactly how much time has passed since the last time the clock was “checked.” If you’re running a radio transmitter at 6ghz, that’s 6 billion cycles per second. If you synch your transmitter to your clock once per second, it had better be accurate to the billionth of a second.

      • @xenoclast
        link
        English
        103 days ago

        This. Clocks like this are for measuring duration in a scientific context.