• Sabata
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 months ago

      The FTC sent an angry letter, that will surely stop them.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 months ago

      It was a pinky promise! You can’t break a pinky promise!

    • @mkwt
      link
      English
      122 months ago

      If only there was some way to regulate corporations.

      It’s called the Sherman Antitrust Act, and it’s why this promise was made and why the FTC cares about it now.

      • Transporter Room 3
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        But DO they really care about it? Or is this just to placate the plebs again?

        I’ll know they care when they actually manage to do something about it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This FTC is incredibly aggressive. Lina khan is the head, a person who made waves in academia by basically redefining antitrust laws in the digital age, with a specific animus for Amazon. Shes led the FTC teeth forward:

          During her tenure, the FTC has pushed to ban non-compete agreements, filed lawsuits against health care companies engaging in anti-competitive practices, and launched a high-profile lawsuit against Amazon.[3] In 2022, the FTC and the DOJ’s anti-trust division blocked a record number of mergers on anti-trust grounds.[4] ABC News described her as taking a more aggressive approach on anti-trust, and earning some conservative supporters during her confirmation and tenure.[1]

        • @mkwt
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          I dunno. I was mostly just trying to explain why the federal government might care about video game pricing at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Isn’t this exactly what Chevron Deference was about? I don’t know how clearly defined the law actually is, but this seems like a prime case for the rubber stamp SCOTUS to jump on and say “actually according to a pig shit farmer from 9500bc the law was meant to mean that monopoly power is awesome.”

  • jprice
    link
    fedilink
    312 months ago

    Three companies that are shit and always have been why would you trust them? The US needs to break the backs of corporations now. Vote and write letters to Congress. It works, it always has. These companies deserve to get dragged through hot coals.

    • aname
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      They should just start enforcing a upper limit in comporation size and start splitting monopolies when they grow too big

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      DNC & RNC enter the chat.

      “Yeah right. Why do you think we exist? We don’t allow those kinds of people to get the support they need to win. We’re corporations for corporations.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 months ago

    Were there not contractual obligations with clear boundaries and penalties? Surely it wasn’t just a “promise”?

    Never should have allowed the merger to begin with. Break them up. Everyone involved in the merger barred from working in the industry for life.

  • @snekerpimp
    link
    English
    182 months ago

    “We had our fingers crossed!!! Haha!”

  • @Fedizen
    link
    English
    42 months ago

    “slammed”

  • @Wooki
    link
    English
    12 months ago

    That will happen when you spend dat cash on venture capitalist porn and forget to pay the bills. Which is strange for a company of accountants.

  • Read bio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -2
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Happy am on linux (Yeah might use windows occasionally but whatever)