• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2614 months ago

    The only certain thing is nobody knows who will be elected until after the polls close and counting is certified.

    VOTE. Everyone vote as if yours is the only one that matters, because it may be.

    • @kmartburrito
      link
      95
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      100% agree. Polls also don’t really account for voter suppression tactics, or gerrymandering and other GOP fuckery, so absolutely vote because our democracy is literally at stake here.

      Our future generations will be impacted by the outcome of this specific election.

    • @proudblond
      link
      English
      154 months ago

      I tend to wonder how these polls are conducted and who is answering them? Does anyone get polls via email or text? Are they still just calling people? I’m in my 40s and basically no one I know my age or younger answers numbers they don’t know anymore, and texts are ignored or flat out blocked because if you respond, they barrage you later, or at least that’s what we all assume.

      So I’m not convinced polls have any bearing on what will happen anymore. VOTE!

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        Yes

        Different polls with different methods.

        Many call people, some online polls (using advertising with demographic targeting), some emails to various news list subscribers, some in person polling, etc. It’s definitely harder these days to get accurate numbers because fewer responders means self imposed selection bias by those answering, which can correlate to the answers you get in unpredictable ways.

    • @venusaur
      link
      -324 months ago

      To be fair, your vote statistically doesn’t matter in some states. I’ll make a bet with somebody that if I don’t vote in my state it won’t change anything.

      Dems really phoned this one in.

      • @ripcord
        link
        16
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        There’s plenty of downticket races that potentially directly affect your life more that matter.

        • @venusaur
          link
          -34 months ago

          This article is about Harris vs Trump

          • @ripcord
            link
            34 months ago

            “Derp”, you say?

            • @venusaur
              link
              -14 months ago

              So, willful ignorance. You must be fun to be friends with.

              • @ripcord
                link
                0
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Derp derp. Derp derp derp.

                Yes, very.

                • @venusaur
                  link
                  -24 months ago

                  Parents need to have more control over what their kids are seeing and doing on the internet.

      • @rayyy
        link
        154 months ago

        I don’t vote in my state it won’t change anything

        Wrong, wrong and wrong.
        Your vote matters down-ballot. Your vote matters for a mandate. Your vote matters because you will pay attention. The trick is to get people to feel the way you do so they can rule you.

        • @venusaur
          link
          -114 months ago

          You wanna make a bet? If I don’t vote, my state will still vote Harris.

          The trick is actually to trick people like you into thinking they have control when they actually don’t.

          • @SeriousMite
            link
            44 months ago

            I would argue that even if your state is guaranteed to go one way or the other (aside from down ballot races which are obviously very important) there’s still value in voting for president, if only to illustrate the discrepancy between the popular vote and the electoral college. The higher we run up the margins, the more it makes it obvious to everyone that we need to ditch the electoral college.

      • @proudblond
        link
        English
        94 months ago

        Federal, maybe, but it’s still important to vote for down ticket races, and your presidential vote can at least be a statistic toward the popular vote count. I get what you mean though, I’m from a consistently blue state.

        • @venusaur
          link
          -44 months ago

          Sure. The article is about Harris vs Trump tho

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      794 months ago

      It’s only been like one day.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        394 months ago

        Better 2-pts up with Harris than 3-pts down with Biden. I like the direction those polls are swinging, even if I wouldn’t put money on an outcome.

      • @rayyy
        link
        34 months ago

        Wait until the convention - momentum and thunder.

    • @paddirn
      link
      English
      254 months ago

      Other polls I had seen just yesterday (likely collected before Biden dropping out was a reality) still had Trump with a 1% or more lead over Harris, so they’re really all over the place and I wouldn’t trust them for much, even up to and including election day. I’m not breathing a sigh of relief until victory is declared, and even then, I wouldn’t be so sure.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      134 months ago

      This is a swing and she’s only beginning to build momentum. Let’s hope things keep moving in the right direction.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      244 months ago

      Polls are garbage.

      The mainstream professional polls have been reliable for some time. They typically get within 2-3pt margin of error when taken a few days before the election, and they serve as a useful bellweather to track public sentiment. In this case, it appears jettisoning Biden is bringing voters back to the Dem fold. That’s what Dems were banking on, and I’d consider it a good thing given how much I don’t want Trump to be President.

      Vote like they don’t exist.

      People who obsessively follow polling are the ones most likely to vote.

      • LeadersAtWork
        link
        114 months ago

        Stepping aside may honestly be the single greatest show of leadership Biden has done in his lifetime. If the polls are swinging, it’s as much due to him making such a historical and respectable move as it is people surprised and refreshed by Kamala Harris.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      Polls were historically accurate in 2022 and generally do a good job of measuring the temperature. Still, vote like they don’t exist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        104 months ago

        Exactly. If polls didn’t matter, Biden would still be running for president. With that being said: vote.

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    564 months ago

    Harris, whose campaign says she has secured the Democratic nomination, led Trump 44% to 42% in the national poll, a difference within the 3-percentage-point margin of error.

    National polls go beyond meaninglessness and into actual harm. The national popular vote does not elect the president, as we all should know too well. My vote in Illinois is worth far less than someone’s vote in Wyoming. Your vote in California is worth far less than someone’s vote in Alaska.

    Unless a national poll weights responses based on state, and based on the electoral college results from states, it is completely misleading.

    • @Moops
      link
      English
      294 months ago

      And my vote in Oklahoma…oh fuck it who are we kidding lol. Meaningless. I still do it though.

      • Irremarkable
        link
        fedilink
        214 months ago

        In a similar situation. Theres a zero percent chance trump doesn’t win my state by at least 10 points. Still gonna vote though.

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          184 months ago

          He’ll see the popular vote count and it will annoy him. He was mad about it even when he won!

          • @idiomaddict
            link
            74 months ago

            Well yeah, that would be a disappointment to anyone, he lost in a popularity contest by 3 million votes to Hillary fucking Clinton. He absolutely deserves to feel bad about it and I hope he remembers every day that he wouldn’t have won if it weren’t for the electoral college.

        • @SirDerpy
          link
          94 months ago

          Both of you should be asking how your vote could be made meaningful outside the scope of your current evaluation.

        • @SirDerpy
          link
          -4
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          This sub hates the following message. That’s why it comes today instead of yesterday.

          Focus on loyalty to ideology, not party affiliation. Left ideology has been most consistently expressed by the Green Party platform (Sanders watered it down, twice). They’ve lots of problems. But, they’re incredibly loyal to the platform.

          If the Green Party gets 5% of the general election vote then they’ll be on every ballot in '28. The Democrats can’t silence the platform choice in primaries as they did twice to Sanders. This would place an incredible amount of pressure on Democrats immediately and be passively sustained for four years.

          In a purple state I’d vote Democrat POTUS for harm reduction. In a blue state it’d depend on the situation. But, in a red state, I risk absolutely nothing by not for voting harm reduction.

          We’re the only ones completely free to act for the long term. The blue wave thinks we’re too stupid to understand nuance. Political parties don’t deserve your loyalty. We need be loyal to each other, especially when we’re hated for our choices.

          • @Dkarma
            link
            44 months ago

            This message is hated because it is false and naive and helps Republicans.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        184 months ago

        Just saw Oklahoma has one of the lowest voter turn outs in the nation. With Tulsa and Oklahoma city it’s more progressive than most people realize. We’ve just got to get out and vote and convince those around us to do the same. I know we have the numbers to win local elections.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          Just saw Oklahoma has one of the lowest voter turn outs in the nation.

          Probably because you’re not allowed to vote if someone from your party isn’t running. We have a county sheriff race that was just decided by drawing a name out of a hat. Dems didn’t get a vote.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        10
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Lots of downticket races can be swung by a popular presidential nominee.

        That said, Oklahoma’s awash in O&G money and its state bureaucrats are notoriously corrupt. At some point, the sheer volume of gerrymandering, vote caging, and criminal disenfranchisement needs to be addressed. Simply shouting at people to “GO VOTE!” when they’re getting handed broken machines and defective butterfly ballots and threatening robocalls isn’t helping anyone, least of all the candidates they’re hoping will win.

      • @cabron_offsets
        link
        94 months ago

        Nah, not meaningless. Any swing away from the degenerates will dispirit them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        Good for you. It may not mean anything for national elections but it could make a difference in a local one

      • @SirDerpy
        link
        -14 months ago

        This sub hates the following message. That’s why it comes today instead of yesterday.

        Focus on loyalty to ideology, not party affiliation. Left ideology has been most consistently expressed by the Green Party platform (Sanders watered it down, twice). They’ve lots of problems. But, they’re incredibly loyal to the platform.

        If the Green Party gets 5% of the general election vote then they’ll be on every ballot in '28. The Democrats can’t silence the platform choice in primaries as they did twice to Sanders. This would place an incredible amount of pressure on Democrats immediately and be passively sustained for four years.

        In a purple state I’d vote Democrat POTUS for harm reduction. In a blue state it’d depend on the nuance of the situation. But, in a red state, I risk absolutely nothing by not for voting harm reduction.

        We’re the only ones completely free to act for the long term. The blue wave thinks we’re too stupid to understand nuance. Political parties don’t deserve your loyalty. We need be loyal to each other, especially when we’re hated for our choices.

        • @Dkarma
          link
          04 months ago

          There is no way the greens can get to 270. You’re suggesting progressives split the Dem vote.

          This is a sure way to lose for Dems and progressives.

          The way to move the party left is with money and primaries not the general election.

  • @razorwiregoatlick
    link
    504 months ago

    I know the top comments in these subs is always something along the lines of “fuck the polls! Go vote!” I agree but damn it is nice to get some positive news now and then!

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      224 months ago

      Right? Enjoy something positive for a few seconds!

    • @chiliedogg
      link
      24 months ago

      Definitely don’t look at polls from the swing states then.

  • @jordanlund
    link
    434 months ago

    As with all the discussions on national polls, it’s necessary to point out that national polls have no meaning. We don’t have national elections.

    Blue states are gonna blue state and red states are gonna red state, so the President will be decided by a handfull of states that don’t reliably vote one way or another, and frankly, we just don’t have enough good data on a Harris nomination to say one way or another.

    Looking at the notable states I’ve looked at before, this data is from before Biden dropped out.

    Arizona - Trump +6 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

    Nevada - Trump +10 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

    New Mexico - No data for Harris.

    Georgia - Trump +5 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

    North Carolina - Trump +4 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/north-carolina/

    Pennsylvania - Trump +4 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/

    Michigan - Trump +5 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

    Wisconsin - Tied.
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

    Minnesota - No data for Harris.
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

    Harris also puts Virginia in play now as well, in what was assumed to be a blue state, now Trump +4.

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/virginia/

    So this is her starting point. She has 105 days to turn this around. The Democratic convention in August is key.

    As of right now though? Here’s the map:

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      324 months ago

      Those polls don’t account for anything that happened after the switch, like the impact of the record number of donations and news blitz. Need to wait for the next round before we really have any idea, and a few more in a few weeks to see where it levels off

      • @jordanlund
        link
        184 months ago

        Yup, like I say, this is the bottom.

        • @Donebrach
          link
          -34 months ago

          this is the bottom

          What does that even mean? You sure spent a lot of energy spreading completely useless and out of date information.

          • @jordanlund
            link
            134 months ago

            It’s what we have and it’s Harris’ starting point.

            Where she goes from here? 🤷‍♂️ But if we don’t track what we have NOW, we won’t be able to see how she improves (or doesn’t) a week from now, a month from now, or two months from now.

            When we get another “national polling suggests…” article in October, it will be interesting to re-run the stats and compare them to this. They should be VASTLY different.

            But what makes it interesting is the progress she makes between now and then.

    • @MehBlah
      link
      84 months ago

      So ESPN favors trump is what you are saying. That site is owned by them. Always look at the bias.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        54 months ago

        They’re aggregating polls with a public methodology. Just because an organization exists doesn’t mean it is pushing a bias in everything it does. If you’re going to claim a bias point it out, say what they are doing to bias the results, you can’t infer it from results.

        • @MehBlah
          link
          14 months ago

          You can’t get anything unbiased if the site is owned by a huge corporation. You can get that fantasy out of your head. That site is nothing but polls by disney.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            But it’s polls by everyone.

            And yes you CAN get unbiased information from a huge corporation. Do you have a weather app? Book publishers are corporations, are Earth Science textbooks biased for one political candidate?

            I’m not saying they CANT be biased, I’m saying you do need literally any evidence before just asserting that they are.

            • @MehBlah
              link
              04 months ago

              On the surface but I hardly am going to trust something that is run by disney.

          • @jordanlund
            link
            34 months ago

            That’s like saying “Rotten Tomatoes” is biased. They’re an aggregate.

            • @MehBlah
              link
              14 months ago

              They are biased not because the aggregate but because they limit reviews. Who uses them? People who can form their own opinions of what they like.

      • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱
        link
        44 months ago

        Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if all or almost all major news outlets have some bias towards Trump from up top since they all are the basically the same people.

        • @MehBlah
          link
          34 months ago

          Entertainment news is pretty much all we have left. All of them are geared toward getting views and ratings. I have zero trust these days. I’m hardly ever surprised when some new corruption comes out and how quickly it disappears behind a cacophony of crap that doesn’t matter to me in the least. When people constantly stand on poll data that in my 53 years I’ve never been asked to participate in any poll. I’m pretty sure I am in no way unique so I figure polls are targeted for a result and I’m not a part of the process. I’m just supposed to be a consumer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    354 months ago

    i’m going to need so much popcorn to watch GOP squirming and flailing desperate to find something to attack LOL

    she’s too OLD!!!

    hunter’s laptop!!!

    buttery males!!!

    LOL

    eat shit, republicans

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          16
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Oh yeah, there’s also “She never had kids!”

          • [email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            144 months ago

            There will be quite a few Muslim allegations as well, for reasons. Which is funny, considering she has history with nearly everything besides Islam.

            • @samus12345
              link
              English
              9
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Oh yeah, probably. Has the GOP ever really sorted out their racist talking points about Indians (from India, not Native Americans)?

              • [email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                64 months ago

                Considering the complete lack of backlash against the commentators who disparaged Vivek this year, they’ve definitely got a handle on it.

              • @Ensign_Crab
                link
                English
                44 months ago

                Oh, some of them are certain to be confused and make racist comments about Native Americans too.

    • Unruffled [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      From a Politico article, we can see how the Russians are starting to talk about Harris. The Republicans aren’t usually far behind…

      “Kamala with the nuclear button is worse than a monkey with a grenade,” Andrei Sidorov, the dean of the global politics department at Moscow State University (a once highly respected institution) said Sunday evening on state television’s prime weekly talk show.

      Edit: and then there’s this: Unhinged Republican candidate calls Kamala Harris a “little wh*re” as GOP descends into misogyny

    • @Ensign_Crab
      link
      English
      34 months ago

      It’s been a delight watching them flail uselessly. They knew they might have Harris as an opponent from the instant someone as old as Biden selected her for VP. They’ve had all this time to do oppo research and focus group what is likely to stick.

      All their arguments against Biden evaporated into nothingness the instant he bowed out and they are completely unprepared to run against Harris.

      They counted on Biden being a stubborn idiot and staying in the race and didn’t have a backup plan.

  • @blazera
    link
    English
    274 months ago

    Let it be a runaway snowball of a lead

  • Proddedcow
    link
    fedilink
    164 months ago

    This is good. Early, sure, but its numbers going in the right direction.

    • @Stovetop
      link
      74 months ago

      Popularity I’m afraid.

      Other polls that factor in additional considerations essentially have them neck-and-neck right now, maybe a 1 or 2% lead for Trump.

      Fucking electoral college…

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        The HoR needs more members, that would solve it without touching the EC.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      Yeah I want to know specifically about say Ohio, Wisconsin, Arizona, etc. I know Harris will win all along the coasts. But that’s only 175 of 270.

    • @VanillaBean
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah this is always the thing people forget… we have this antiquated electoral college thing.

  • @barsquid
    link
    154 months ago

    That’s good news but still too close. We all need to continue informing the public that Donald is a dementia-ridden geriatric physically and mentally unfit for the office.

    • @Ensign_Crab
      link
      English
      54 months ago

      Her polls before Biden did the right thing were lower. She has upward momentum. Biden had downward momentum.

  • Optional
    link
    104 months ago

    1.) POLLS ARE GARBAGE.

    2.) Corporate news cannot run a horse race without polls

    3.) See #1

  • nifty
    link
    84 months ago

    Polls mean nothing, the trends on polls aren’t guaranteed if people get complacent and don’t turn out. Voter apathy is the worst thing that can happen to Dems in this election

    • Ab_intra
      link
      44 months ago

      Well I hope they learned from 2016. I think they did…

  • @DarkCloud
    link
    84 months ago

    Project 2025 mentions Trump’s name 300 times. Officials from his administration were involved in writing it. It’s a plan to replace public servants with “Trump loyalist” - which Trump calls “destroying the deep state” but is actually know as “Unitary Executive Theory”, aka a dictatorship.

    In 2018, The Heritage Foundation said on their website, that two-thirds of the previous “Mandate for Leadership” they wrote for Trump had been passed into law. They’re a big part of how the GOP sets policy when in office, dating back to the Reagan era.