• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    128
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Chapter 11 is Donny’s favorite number:

    Taj Mahal, Trump University/Castle/Shuttle/Steaks/Vodka/Ice/Magazine, and now Trump Media.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      334 months ago

      He’s just gonna dump the stock and make out like bank leaving the rest to flounder.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think there’s a lock out period for him following the merger but I don’t know for how long. There’s still time for the stock (DJT) to plummet, with any luck.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          184 months ago

          6 months. From April I think, so that would mean he can sell in October.

          The share price is absurd. Idiots buying because they want to support trump somehow. The shares are worthless but hapless idiots will pay stupid prices for them.

          He will start selling as soon as he can. I expect there will be a steady downward trajectory but who knows how fast and how low.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I bet that he blames “market manipulation” or something to his followers when he sells.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            24 months ago

            It’s definitely not retail investors. The entire thing very obviously a back channel for the mob and Russians to pay Donald Trump for various things by propping up the share price.

          • @Pacmanlives
            link
            14 months ago

            Which means there be a massive pump in September/early October and then dump

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              I don’t think it will be quite so pronounced. Trump has a majority holding so he will have to drop comparatively small holdings whenever he can do so without tanking the price.

          • @TehWorld
            link
            English
            14 months ago

            Foreign governments are certainly propping up shares.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          24 months ago

          It was a few months, but I think it’s about to expire.

    • @Zachariah
      link
      174 months ago

      Wow, you actually read Art of the Deal ?

      • @ChicoSuave
        link
        114 months ago

        I think he keeps bankrupting his companies so that he can update the list of his businesses in the book, creating new editions every few years. If you have an old copy, just burn it because the new ones are so much better with the newest info. In fact, after burning the old one, wait a bit for the new one to drop. He’s clearly getting ready to update the new one with DWAC and Trump Media.

    • @kevindqc
      link
      13
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Excuse me! Trump Vodka, the world’s finest super premium Vodka, still exists in Israel!

      • @athairmor
        link
        104 months ago

        It’s so fitting. Vodka is the cheapest alcohol you can make. It’s basically watered down ethanol. Overpriced vodka is so on-brand for a Trump. And he still couldn’t make a profit.

        I wonder why it still exists in Israel. I bet he sold the rights to it there and has nothing to do with the business.

  • @vegetaOP
    link
    61
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    You mean advertisers aren’t climbing all over themselves to buy spots on it? Maybe the new streaming service will save the day.

    /s

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      564 months ago

      He could try suing companies for not running ads. It seems to be working for Elon.

      • Drunemeton
        link
        English
        84 months ago

        I’d heard that he was going to do that, but is he and it’s working!?

        • @Sludgehammer
          link
          English
          164 months ago

          Depends on how you define “working”.

          He managed to kill a non-profit that advised not advertising on Xitter because it’s a racist shithole. I don’t think it’s gonna bring back any advertisers, but with the help of a pet Texas judge he’s SLAPP suing his detractors out of existence.

        • magnetosphere
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          He just filed the lawsuit in the last few days. Too early to tell if it’s working, but many legal experts are laughing at it.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    494 months ago

    doesnt he have a 450m bill due soon?

    e. just checked, not til after an appeal in sept.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          34 months ago

          that one he has to put the cash up in escrow before he can appeal.

          • originalucifer
            link
            fedilink
            214 months ago

            he already did, and the fucking let him squeak by on a 175m bond from an agency that wasnt technically financially able to do it.

            because rich people have different rules.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44 months ago

              Not just financially unable, legally unable. They weren’t authorized to issue surety bonds in New York.

              • originalucifer
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                ha! I had actually had typed out ‘legally’ but changed it. legality is irrelevant if its allowed to stand and it is standing, isnt it?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  14 months ago

                  “When the president does it, that means it is not illegal” also applies to former presidents, I guess.

          • @barsquid
            link
            14 months ago

            Oh did they finally make him put in money instead of lowering the requirements and giving him more chances?

            • originalucifer
              link
              fedilink
              44 months ago

              they lowered the bond to 175m, and let him used an illegal-in-new-york bond agency.

  • /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    234 months ago

    Iirc they only brought in like 300k in revenue. Somebody fact check me but it was definitely between 300k-400k in revenue. So that net loss is fucking insane.

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      194 months ago

      It in the article

      Trump Media, which owns the Truth Social app often used by the former president, also reported revenue of just $836,900 for the quarter ending June 30, a 30% drop from the same period in 2023

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          -8
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          If the numbers are content. That’s about 3.2 million in revenue and 64 million loss per year.

          While people want to clap over that. Many companies are not profitable their first few years.

          I work for a tech company. We are well known, bring in billions but one made a profit once or twice in twenty years.

          Prior company the same.

          It’s amazing that you can bring in billions and still not make a dime

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            94 months ago

            Big companies do this on purpose. They want their earnings and their expenses to match up as close as possible, because companies don’t pay any taxes on money spent on making money, only on profits. So if a giant company is in the red, the vast majority of operating expenses are tax deductible

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
              link
              English
              24 months ago

              I’ve worked for two successful startups and they also tried really hard to break even every year, for the reason you’re mentioned. The thing their investors wanted to see was revenue growth, not profits. As revenue grew they would hire more people to use up the money.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              -54 months ago

              It’s also hard to turn a profit. People think running a company is easy. It’s not. Employees, health care, etc all add up. Hell when we sell software, it takes a few years to break even on it and our margins are 95%+. Out ceo doesn’t care about paying taxes. Most don’t. They’d rather be profitable but that’s a tough goal to achieve on a consistent basis.

          • @Tyfud
            link
            74 months ago

            You generally don’t want losses as a business. Even a startup. Ever. You want your revenue and expenses to be as close as possible,ESPECIALLY for the first few years.

            Some insane Silicon Valley companies take VC money and operate at a massive, massive loss, banking on making that up with a spike in growth later. In most cases, it’s built into their business model that they’d be operating at a loss for X quarters.

            That’s not what’s happening here. They’re operating at a huge, huge loss, and they have no realistic business prospects for how to close that gap, ever.

            Additionally, the market leader in their space (Twitter/X), is making a hard right pivot and becoming a right wing platform/safehaven. This is further reducing an already thin market share they might have claimed.

            Purely as a business investment, if I saw these numbers, in this market condition, I would pull my money immediately. Halt all further investment. Call a board meeting. Liquidate the company to try and pay off the debts, and any proceeds are returned to the shareholders.

            I would, under no circumstances, continue to invest in a company like that, expecting any sort of return on my investment. I could only expect to lose whatever else I put in.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            64 months ago

            There’s a world of difference between not having any profit because you’re aggressively reinvesting it into your business, and not having any profit because you spent 16 million to keep the lights on for a service that brought in approximately 5% of what you spent.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              -84 months ago

              That’s not uncommon through. Meta, twitter, etc didn’t have any real revenue for years. I think truth will last through the year and then die off unless Trump wins. Maybe two years. Hell I’m a conservative and I don’t know anyone who uses it. I would say it means more maga and once Trump is gone, it’ll die off.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            54 months ago

            Many companies are not profitable their first few years.

            Especially if they’re a Twitter ripoff with one single user being the only one anyone cares about in terms of who posts.

            In fact, I’m going to make a, what I feel is pretty safe, prediction that Truth Social also won’t make a profit over their last few years.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            If you revenue grows 100% YoY and you are investing in growth, sure. I work for a 15 year old company that is just starting to become profitable, still growing well into double digits.

            None of that is true here.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              -34 months ago

              Put it in perspective. Twitter, Facebook, both had higher expenses and less revenue at the same mark.

              Truth has 600k active users a month which isn’t bad for a two year old company

              I just see it as a fad that won’t last.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                74 months ago

                600k active users and shrinking. That’s the problem. No growth perspective, no plans, just grift. Let alone how many of those are bots.

                • @ChickenLadyLovesLife
                  link
                  English
                  34 months ago

                  I always question “active users”, too. A few years ago I worked for a large cable company. We put out an app for them that let users email, text and make VoIP calls. Absolutely nobody in the real world used it but the company was able to make it look like it had well over a million daily users. They offered a discount on people’s cable bills if they installed the app so a lot of people did, and then the app would ping the servers once a day and this would be logged as an “active daily user.” So the million daily users was just customers who hadn’t bothered to uninstall the fucking thing. The company veeps behind the app knew it was total bullshit, but they were just trying to justify the expense of producing the app to the higher-ups.

                  It’s depressing to think that I spent eight years of my career writing exactly this type of useless bullshit cable company flagship app, for many different cable companies and ISPs. At least the final year was just doing literally nothing all day while “working” from home until I was finally laid off.

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              -24 months ago

              As I clearly said I don’t use it. I checked it out a few times and it’s not my jam. It’s very MAGA and I’m not a maga republican.
              I find it’s overly focused on the culture war which doesn’t interest me.

  • @graycube
    link
    164 months ago

    Another example of his awesome business skills that he’ll be able to transfer to running the government. \s

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    154 months ago

    Just hang in there guys and keep spending. Remember it takes all the money to make all the money 💰💰! Wink wink.

  • @dogslayeggs
    link
    124 months ago

    And not a single one of his unbelievably stupid fans will sell their stock in it until he cashes out in a couple months. The absolute first second he’s allowed to sell his stake, that shit’s going to crater hard with all his Stans losing their life savings.

    The real treasure was all the grifts he did along the way.

  • @reddig33
    link
    94 months ago

    When is he allowed to sell his stake? I seem to recall there was a time limit after going public.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      As soon as he sells it’s going to signal that he is done with the platform to all his “investors”, and will likely trigger a selloff until it craters and his base loses their money (not good to do until at least after the election).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        You make a good point, and yet I wouldn’t be shocked if many people were still rabid fans even if he sold it at their expense. There’s a lot of weird idolization around him, and seems like the kind of thing many of his fans would laud as his great business acumen, ignoring the negative impacts it had on them.

      • @Buddahriffic
        link
        24 months ago

        Yeah but then he might be left unable to cash in on this grift. Though it will make his coup harder to pull off if his followers hate him. Could go either way.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It won’t be sold as a single block – the shares will just be placed on the market.

        I expect that he’ll sell for as a little as is necessary.

  • @Jimbabwe
    link
    94 months ago

    I’m not usually this petty, but… haha, get fucked

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      I mean, Trump is doing very well out of this. The people who listened to him and bought stock in the thing are another story.

      • Vanon
        link
        English
        14 months ago

        I think we’re all hoping DJT stock loses most of its value before he cashes out. And the probability increases if he looks like he will not be president. So much of his future is tied up with him winning. What a shame…