Democratic vice-presidential candidate Tim Walz is getting a more positive public reception than his Republican counterpart: More Americans see Walz favorably than unfavorably, contrary to JD Vance, and more approve of Walz’s selection for the nation’s No. 2 job, according to new ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll.

Thirty-nine percent in the poll have a favorable impression of Walz as a person, while 30% see him unfavorably. That compares with an underwater favorable-unfavorable rating for Vance, 32%-42%.

  • @eran_morad
    link
    75
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Bruh. She could have chosen a carrot and it’d get better ratings than Vance.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      123 months ago

      I totally expected her to pick Josh Shapiro, Tim was a pleasant surprise

    • @ChocoboRocket
      link
      53 months ago

      You underestimate how retard-angry Republicans are.

      All someone has to do is call that carrot woke and it’ll get legitimate death threats by days end.

      • @Viking_Hippie
        link
        43 months ago

        The irony of using a slur to make fun of Republicans 🤦

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
          link
          7
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I want to use that word on Republicans so bad. There is no slur more fitting for them, and it sucks that the word is so disparaging to decent people with various disabilities.

          Obviously that wasn’t always the case. During grad school I found an old book in the library stacks from the '50s or '60s and the title was something horrific, like “A Modern Approach to Managing Retards in the Workplace.” And it was like a serious textbook written for social workers or teachers and paraprofessionals and the like.

          Naturally, I removed it from the stacks, and placed it on the desk of the EIC of the law journal (my desk), sort of as a joke, like as a message to all the staff and junior editors. This was sometime before the R word was widely considered such an offensive slur.

  • @vegeta
    link
    383 months ago

    That’s because most americans enjoy their couches, and do not want them soiled.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      Most Americans are not, in fact, down with heterosectionals, and are not comfortable with one being the VP nominee.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      23 months ago

      I hated him before, but now I also hate him just for that.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        33 months ago

        I saw mf weedwhacking in shorts and sandles, and not like a quick touch up, dude was straight chopping away in a meadow with the wrong attire like a fucking moron.

    • @WhatAmLemmy
      link
      English
      22
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Conservatism is fucking weird. They spend their lives obsessed with gender, race, religion, guns, and children — like a communicable disease of authoritarian narcissistic pedophilia — while calling the people who want to conserve the Earth “radical”.

      It’s a mental illness.

      • @lennybird
        link
        English
        7
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        As a millennial bridging the zoomers and boomers I think what Walz really meant to say is Conservatism is cringe. If Republicans were savvy they could flip the weird narrative and embrace it because weird can be good but fortunately they are not. Can’t flip cringe.

        Trump & Friends are cringe, gross, and absurd to me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          Conservatives value conformity, which is why ‘weird’ works so well to insult them.

          It’s only insulting because they believe it is; call most leftists weird and they’ll probably say something like “Yeah I’m weird, fuck normal.”

          • @lennybird
            link
            English
            43 months ago

            You know that’s a great point! Conformity essential to being with the in-group of conservatives. That shifts my view substantially on this.

          • @lennybird
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Classic Gen X’er… Boomer-lite hahaha. Ok sorry that was too far.

            • @SpaceNoodle
              link
              23 months ago

              Y’all forgot we even existed, and now you deign to throw shade?

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                English
                33 months ago

                Gen x doesnt exist, they’re either boomers or millennials.

                Depends on how cool they are.

                (/j)

              • @lennybird
                link
                English
                13 months ago

                Hahaha. I mean technically millennials are still the largest segment of the bridge connecting zoomers to boomers, but yeah… My bad…

        • @Mikelius
          link
          23 months ago

          But they can’t flip that narrative, it’s anathema to them. Between the “silent majority” bullshit and their fake idealized past (women and minorities knew their place, queer folks would get the queer beaten out of them) they cling to the idea that their view is correct and how things should be.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
            link
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            their fake idolized past

            Don’t forget guns. These people went so full moron, that they straight up forgot that the original gun laws in the Americas was purpossive open carry only, no habitual open carry. If you weren’t a banker, a cattleman, a sheriff, or the like, or if nobody had threatened your life, and your jacket blew open in the breeze and allowed the public to see that you were carrying a gun, you would have been arrested for breach of peace. Because it’s fucking weird to show up at the bar or at a grocery store or whatever with a gun for no reason.

            There are dozens of early legal cases in this country that prove these facts, and you can also reference the constitutions of the original colonies, none of which enshrined a individual right to carry firearms. You can also reference the Philadelphia constitutional convention where a version of the second Amendment containing an Express individual right was unanimously rejected by the delegates in favor of our current version.

            The second amendment itself even tells you right in the sentence what its purpose is, and It’s “the security of the state,” not the individual. An individual right to bear arms does not redeem a state security interest, a ready militia does, though. that’s my Ted talk.

  • @UncleGrandPa
    link
    143 months ago

    If you asked both to help you move… Walz would show up with beer and a hand truck and Vance would send you a pic of himself… poolside

    • @barsquid
      link
      73 months ago

      I’d never ask JD to help me move because I need someone I can trust to carry couches.

    • @Lasherz12
      link
      53 months ago

      Somehow, it still seems true even though he doesn’t drink beer. It’s just for you; what a guy.

  • @Num10ck
    link
    English
    103 months ago

    if i can’t trust you with a VP pick, how can I trust you with a global superpower?

  • @iAvicenna
    link
    33 months ago

    I mean vance is a low bar for comparison

  • Media Bias Fact CheckerB
    link
    -43 months ago
    ABC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for ABC News:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tim-walz-jd-vance-favorability-poll/story?id=112863591
    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-updates/election-2024-kamala-harris-donald-trump-walz-vance/?id=112767640

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support