• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 hours ago

    I legit have a copy of this story somewhere that ends with a “the moral is…” statement along the lines of “that’s why you should work hard and not be lazy”.

    Like, what? We did not cover the work ethic of the pigs at all here. As far as I can tell, they each built an entire goddamn house! What about the wolf?

    • @candybrie
      link
      245 minutes ago

      The version I remember being told had the first little pig just look around and see straw, the second little pig had to go gather sticks from the nearby woods, and the third little pig had to actually make the bricks over days.

  • AmidFuror
    link
    fedilink
    335 hours ago

    Actually, the pigs lives in an egalitarian society. All three had access to straw, sticks, and bricks. Unfortunately, there was no sort of meritocracy involved until the wolf came along. The stupid pigs were allowed to do as they wished. No building codes, and no one wanted to “dwelling-shame” them.

    • @kautau
      link
      63 hours ago

      Well with infinite access to resources the pigs should have been stockpiling and starting to build businesses in the expectation that they would have needed to protect their property and could have hired a bigger, badder wolf at an acceptable market rate to ensure a minimal loss

      /s in case that wasn’t clear

  • @spookex
    link
    164 hours ago

    I don’t remember any of the versions of this story involving money.

    Nobody ever mentioned where the materials came from, it was just two dumbasses who decided to build their houses out of inferior materials

    • @kautau
      link
      43 hours ago

      No no you don’t understand. Every children’s story is about beating your competition in the market and how regulation doesn’t actually support competition because it’s on you to analyze and prepare for market forces. Also my billion dollar vehicle company is failing because I didn’t properly prepare, I’m gonna need a major government bailout

  • @elbucho
    link
    English
    165 hours ago

    It could also be interpreted as a criticism of Libertarianism. The first two pigs didn’t go by any building codes, and instead decided that they wanted to build their shelters out of inferior materials with substandard protections against high winds. The third pig made sure that his dwelling met hurricane standards, and was saved. The story doesn’t go into the reasons why pigs #1 and #2 chose inferior building materials, so it could be interpreted in a number of different ways. It doesn’t HAVE to be about economics. It could just be that pigs #1 and #2 were big fans of Ayn Rand and reaped the whirlwind as a result.

  • Hugucinogens
    link
    fedilink
    126 hours ago

    100% lol, hadn’t thought of it that way

    As per usual. If you don’t have money to protect yourself, it’s because you’re lazy and/or stupid, and definitely worth condescending.

  • @cheese_greater
    link
    86 hours ago

    What are some other aristocracy-informed cautionary tales haha?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      Every fairy tale with a good king/queen/princess/prince?

      Or One Thousand and One Nights has the king killing his wifes left and right, but by the end it’s alright, because he really loves his current wife now…

      Since you are asking for cautionary tales, The Fisherman and his Wife might a better fit. Just be glad of what you have and don’t strive for advancing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      145 hours ago

      Rudolph the rednosed reindeer

      It is bad to be different as long as it is not economically exploitable