• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    91 hour ago

    Why can corporations own nuclear plants? Aren’t they people? Can I own a nuclear plant? Or am I just stuck building additional pylons?

  • @IchNichtenLichten
    link
    English
    495 hours ago

    I can’t wait for this AI bubble to pop.

    I’m not saying that some parts of AI have utility - machine learning for medical scans will be a great thing for instance, but the “oooh new! shiny! venture capitalist, line-must-go-up” side of things can well and truly fuck off.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    656 hours ago

    What a waste of power. Somehow they went from “we’re green tech!” to “fuck it, we need ALL the power” real quick. And for nothing.

    • stinerman [Ohio]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 hours ago

      The plant is actually going to be renamed “Crane Clean Energy Center” so it’s fine!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 hour ago

        Don’t forget that Microsoft isn’t some dumb company trying to jump on the AI bandwagon. They’re a cloud provider and Azure provides lots of AI options.

        Microsoft is one of the platforms raking in heaps of money from dumb companies trying to jump on the AI bandwagon. They’re the equivalent of the people selling MAGA shirts outside trump rallies.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          159 minutes ago

          Microsoft is one of the platforms raking in heaps of money from dumb companies trying to jump on the AI bandwagon.

          True. But one of their biggest customers is OpenAI. A big part of Microsoft’s investment in OpenAI comes in the form of free access to its data centers (which cost money to run, thus costing Microsoft in the short term). By taking advantage of OpenAI’s non-profit status, Microsoft was able to write off a bunch of those losses early on as tax deductions.

          But they’re still losses.

          Other firms using Microsoft to jump on the AI bandwagon might help make up the difference. But that’s like saying “I’m only doing some of my own heroin, so I still come out ahead”. Given the current rate of return on AI investments, the only truly correct investment value is $0.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        145 hours ago

        They are making money off AI. Don’t think they’re not. I don’t understand how, but these company’s are getting profit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          155 hours ago

          If you look at the enterprise pricing and options for Copilot and Security Copilot, they’re building a pretty obvious business model around automating everything from end user basic tasks to tier 1 incident response.

          I’m not advocating that it will work, especially as a person in IR but, all the big players are pushing for security automation. All it’s going to take is one high profile incident to shift the CSO’s and the like to jump in with both hands full of “ai” purchase orders.

          The shittiest part is, this is only going to eliminate more entry level secops jobs. Jobs that are generally a great place to start in the industry.

          • DreamButt
            link
            English
            95 hours ago

            It’s also going to create more headaches for the people left to fix things

        • @Blue_Morpho
          link
          55 hours ago

          Not necessarily. Companies chase what’s popular because it boosts the stock. Executives get bonuses and move to the next hot idea.

          Remember when everything was block chain?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            45 hours ago

            No, I mean they are literally making money from it. Asianometry touched on it, but didn’t explain how they were making the profit.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          45 hours ago

          They’re racking in a ton of investment case on AI. I’m sure there’s also a slew of government contracts that keep this beast afloat.

          But in terms of real value added to the economy? This seems like its just another Wall Street bubble waiting to pop.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil
              link
              English
              75 hours ago

              They’re seeing a flood of new investment, but they’re also absorbing huge losses from within their AI divisions.

              The profits they’re reaping are in other sectors.

  • @Kyrgizion
    link
    65 hours ago

    Would be incredibly ironic if that thing melted down again and took MS’s datacenters with it.

    • @Ibaudia
      link
      English
      245 hours ago

      It was only a partial meltdown, some cooling systems failed and it was successfully contained! Safety precautions designed to stop a full meltdown and release of radiation succeeded.

      I know that’s not really the point of your comment but I feel like this particular incident has a lot of misinfo and I wanted to help elucidate what happened.

      • @techt
        link
        439 minutes ago

        This isn’t true – radioactive gases were leaked into the surrounding area. The containment vessel remained intact, and NRC concluded that no measurable harm was done, but there was definitely a release and that’s why it was such a big deal. They evacuated children and pregnant women from the area in response.

        https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2010/ML20106F218.pdf

    • Fubber Nuckin'
      link
      115 hours ago

      Nuclear meltdowns are incredibly uncommon though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    So Microsoft will also be repsonible for taking care of the nuclear waste until it’s not toxic anymore, right? Right??

    • @lemming741
      link
      English
      93 hours ago

      They’ve taken responsibility for all the arsenic and mercury released from the coal fired power plants they consumed energy from, so I have to assume that they will here too.